Circumcised Guys: Are you ever jealous or resentful towards Uncut guys?

[Mcuthigh]

My favorite part is that all of this focuses on the science (which is ultimately secondary - we don't do preventative surgery for anything else, like pulling wisdom teeth before they've erupted, removing the appendix / tonsils before they show signs of problems, etc.) and not the concept of bodily autonomy.

That's the part I don't understand. Again, if someone is happy with the fact that they're cut, that's awesome, more power to them. But since it's a one-way process, it shouldn't be done before someone can make the choice themselves, unless there's a medical necessity (phimosis - even though this can often be solved naturally without surgery -, etc.) I'm not arguing against circumcision as a practice, just circumcision on infants who have no say in the matter.

All four of my wisdom teeth were pulled at the same time based upon the crown of my lower left wisdom tooth was growing 90% to the vertical and was slowly pushing forward with the concave crown locked against the convex side of the Adjacent tooth. There were indications that the other 3 wisdom teeth might follow the same course and as long as I was sedated, they removed all of the redundant teeth at the same time. I was no say in the matter and that is quite OK with me. I do not want the teeth or my foreskin back either.

 

[Uncutsouthernboy]

Better look up paraphimosls and balanitis....pretty much require a foreskin for those too.

Oh, yes, forgot about them. They are even rarer than phimosis.

"Balanitis is an infection or inflammation of the skin on the head (glans) of the penis. In men who are not circumcised, this area is covered by a flap of skin known as the foreskin, or prepuce. Balanitis can occur in both circumcised and uncircumcised men, although it occurs more commonly in men who are not circumcised."

 

[Uncutsouthernboy]

All four of my wisdom teeth were pulled at the same time based upon the crown of my lower left wisdom tooth was growing 90% to the vertical and was slowly pushing forward with the concave crown locked against the convex side of the Adjacent tooth. There were indications that the other 3 wisdom teeth might follow the same course and as long as I was sedated, they removed all of the redundant teeth at the same time. I was no say in the matter and that is quite OK with me. I do not want the teeth or my foreskin back either.

I was told my wisdom teeth would need removing as the xray showed they were "impacted", the same as yours. I chose not to have the surgery done. Only 3 of them came in and they came in very straight with no problems. The doctor only wanted the money. This same Dentist told my dad he severely needed his teeth cleaned. He made the appt. and for some reason did not keep it. He saw the dentist soon after and dad asked him, "how did she do on cleaning my teeth?" The dentist looked in him mouth and proclaimed, "She did an excellent job." He never went back.

 

[tarzan2591]

I wish I was uncut. Just to be able to have foreskin to slide up and down would be nice. Also would love to feel what a blow job would feel like when they put their youngest inside the foreskin. It also makes it look thicker.

I still love my penis but would have preferred being uncut. If I have sons they will be uncut.

 

[Mcuthigh]

Oh, yes, forgot about them. They are even rarer than phimosis.

"Balanitis is an infection or inflammation of the skin on the head (glans) of the penis. In men who are not circumcised, this area is covered by a flap of skin known as the foreskin, or prepuce. Balanitis can occur in both circumcised and uncircumcised men, although it occurs more commonly in men who are not circumcised."

However, an accumulation of costs for single incident visits/consultations/manipulations/medications/ointments needed to treat foreskin-only or prevalently-caused conditions easily exceed a $313 infant circumcision which would have precluded the incident(s) with a procedure success rate of over 97.5% and any complications are very minor. Even then, if stretching, pulling and /or kneading of foreskins in not successful, a more complex and expensive circumcision may well be required anyway after months or possibly years of angst.

 

[Quiet]

Totally jealous.

 

[Uncutsouthernboy]

However, an accumulation of costs for single incident visits/consultations/manipulations/medications/ointments needed to treat foreskin-only or prevalently-caused conditions easily exceed a $313 infant circumcision which would have precluded the incident(s) with a procedure success rate of over 97.5% and any complications are very minor. Even then, if stretching, pulling and /or kneading of foreskins in not successful, a more complex and expensive circumcision may well be required anyway after months or possibly years of angst.

Meatal stenosis affects 9-20% of males who are circumcised. Children who are not toilet-trained are more prone to develop meatal stenosis after circumcision because of exposure of the meatus to urine in diapers. Meatal stenosis is repaired by a painful surgery with a long recovery time. The child must urinate in a tub full of water as it is too painful.

 

[James Bell]

Meatal stenosis affects 9-20% of males who are circumcised. Children who are not toilet-trained are more prone to develop meatal stenosis after circumcision because of exposure of the meatus to urine in diapers. Meatal stenosis is repaired by a painful surgery with a long recovery time. The child must urinate in a tub full of water as it is too painful.

Really? This meta-analysis in a well respected peer-reviewed journal would suggest otherwise....especially if you apply petroleum jelly to the child's glans....

. 2017 Dec;110:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Does Circumcision Increase Meatal Stenosis Risk?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract
Context: Meatal stenosis (MS) as a potential complication of male circumcision and controversy regarding the magnitude of risk.

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess (1) MS diagnosis after circumcision, (2) the potential association of MS with circumcision, and (3) a potential method of prevention.

Data sources: PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and bibliographies of original studies were searched using the keywords circumcision and stenosis or stricture.

Study selection: Studies containing original data on MS following circumcision at any age.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently verified study design and extracted data.

Results: Thirty eligible studies were retrieved. A random effects meta-analysis of 27 studies (350 MS cases amongst 1,498,536 males) found that the risk of MS in circumcised males was 0.656% (95% confidence interval 0.435-0.911). Meta-analysis of 3 observational studies that compared MS prevalence in circumcised and uncircumcised males found non-significantly higher prevalence in circumcised males (odds ratio 3.20; 95% confidence interval 0.73-13.9). Meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of petroleum jelly application to the glans after circumcision found that this intervention was associated with MS risk reduction (relative risk 0.024; 95% confidence interval 0.0048-0.12).

Conclusion: MS risk after circumcision is low (< 1%). Weak evidence suggests that MS risk might be higher in circumcised boys and young adult males. Risk is reduced by petroleum jelly application. Further research on MS arising from lichen sclerosus in older uncircumcised males is needed.

 

[Nimajnev]

All four of my wisdom teeth were pulled at the same time based upon the crown of my lower left wisdom tooth was growing 90% to the vertical and was slowly pushing forward with the concave crown locked against the convex side of the Adjacent tooth. There were indications that the other 3 wisdom teeth might follow the same course and as long as I was sedated, they removed all of the redundant teeth at the same time. I was no say in the matter and that is quite OK with me. I do not want the teeth or my foreskin back either.

There is absolutely 0% chance that they operated on your wisdom teeth without your prior knowledge and consent. Short of life-saving procedures, it is against the law for them to have done so - and medically irresponsible to start cutting out teeth if they can't be certain of specific positioning through x-ray verification (something that you would have done while conscious.)

If the indicators are there that your wisdom teeth needed to be removed, then that's a "medically relevant" procedure, and falls within the purview of what I said.

 

[longstroke7]

I'm not resentful, but I wonder how it would feel to have my foreskin intact. It looks like it feels really good when stroking your shaft and the foreskin retracts. Plus just based on porn it seems like having foreskin makes your cock thicker, like Manuel Ferrara and Chris Diamond

I mean I'm fine with what I have but I wonder what if

 

[Mcuthigh]

Totally jealous.

Totally NOT jealous in any way!!

 

[BigAl9]

I am highly resentful that I was neonatally cut. To realize that the average cut adult male has been deprived of some 10.000 to 50.000 sensory nerve endings, and I am quite a bit bigger than the average male, I have often wondered how many I have been deprived of. What would sex have been like if my penis had been left as nature had intended. I have a younger brother who was not cut. I was raised in a rural community. I was the only cut boy. This was observed when skinny dipping in my teens. One time, as an adult, I asked my mother "Why?" She could not answer me. Now I often wonder if some of my erection problems prior to restoring were due to that fateful cut. Restoring has resulted in a greatly improved sensitivity.

 

[961671]

Not ever jealous or resentful to those guys who are uncut. Instead I am annoyed that my parents made that decision for me to be circumcised. Plus I was circumcised later too. The procedure for me was around 6 or 7 year old so I remember the day. It is such a pointless procedure. Nature knows what it’s doing by males being born with their swords sheathed. Needless to say I am looking to naturally restore my foreskin.

 

[illusionguy]

I am extremely happy with my penis and think that it a rather good looking cut cock.
I am never resentful or jealous of any man who is uncut. I just believe that they are as they were intended to be. Saying that, I am annoyed that my parents decided that I should be circumcised when I was a baby and could have no possible input.
It is a major decision for a male and he should be the one who decides if he wants his foreskin removed. There are medical reasons for having a circumcision and they are what should be considered.

 

[Sailingbear]

Resent no, jealous yes.

 

[MMT22]

I'm not resentful or jealous towards intact guys. My parents had me circumcised at birth and that is what I have. Life is too short to worry about such trivial shit.

 

[MDM8]

I just had a question for Circumcised Guys:

Are you ever jealous or resentful towards Uncut guys?

Like in such a way where you want there to become some rule that says they all have to get there foreskins cut off?

I never would have thought that I would feel the way I feel...but the more I talk to and meet guys that are like latino and other nationalities who are uncut, but living in america.

There is a part of me that wants them to be required to get circumcised...or Americanized...lol...I know this is totally wrong to feel this way...but I mean its not like I or most of the other circumcised guys in america had a choice about it either...so why should they be allowed to live here but retain a complete penis when that isn't the current american way...

I think part of me feels this way because they just don't value what they have...and some of them treat circumcised guys like total shit...when it wasn't even our choice...

Not resentful in any way, but definitely jealous of guys with a nice thick foreskin!
Would love to have that added thickness and friction at the head of my cock.
One of my favorite porn stars is Danny D partly due to his foreskin, but mostly for his huge monster cock!

 

[opinionman]

I am highly resentful that I was neonatally cut. To realize that the average cut adult male has been deprived of some 10.000 to 50.000 sensory nerve endings, and I am quite a bit bigger than the average male, I have often wondered how many I have been deprived of. What would sex have been like if my penis had been left as nature had intended. I have a younger brother who was not cut. I was raised in a rural community. I was the only cut boy. This was observed when skinny dipping in my teens. One time, as an adult, I asked my mother "Why?" She could not answer me. Now I often wonder if some of my erection problems prior to restoring were due to that fateful cut. Restoring has resulted in a greatly improved sensitivity.

I can understand this conceptually; you feel cheated. I couldn't help thinking of my cut friend who said, "Uncut guys claim it's more sensitive, but jeez, how much more sensitive do you need it?" I guess his point was that his cut dick was sensitive enough, but I suppose the only way to really have an opinion is to have been uncut then cut and even then it seems tricky to compare.

 

[opinionman]

I'm not resentful, but I wonder how it would feel to have my foreskin intact. It looks like it feels really good when stroking your shaft and the foreskin retracts. Plus just based on porn it seems like having foreskin makes your cock thicker, like Manuel Ferrara and Chris Diamond

I mean I'm fine with what I have but I wonder what if

But doesn't it feel "really good" when you stroke your cut cock?

 

[longstroke7]

But doesn't it feel "really good" when you stroke your cut cock?

Yeah but I'm wondering how it feels with the skin and nerve endings that got cut off