fakers

[13788]

rangersean: JJ, I really don't care if you believe me or not, I decline to take your silly challenge. I'm not here for your pleasure, but for my edification and amusement.

Regardless, my main point stands, your statistics and calculations are faulty in their assumptions and in their basis. Any assumptions drawn from such are at least as faulty. So whether I personally am as large as I claim is irrellevent. Your claim that I _cannot_ be that large is not correct whether I am or not.

 

[13788]

john_jones9: [quote author=rangersean link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#20 date=04/22/04 at 20:14:05]JJ, I really don't care if you believe me or not, I decline to take your silly challenge. I'm not here for your pleasure, but for my edification and amusement.

Regardless, my main point stands, your statistics and calculations are faulty in their assumptions and in their basis. Any assumptions drawn from such are at least as faulty. So whether I personally am as large as I claim is irrellevent. Your claim that I _cannot_ be that large is not correct whether I am or not.[/quote]

Coming from a guy with a picture of a thick bulge running down the side of his shorts that's a bit of a ridiculous statement.

I mean come on, you have as an avatar some picture that's supposed to be you with a bulge that looks nowhere near 13" long, unless you're 7' tall and then tell us you have no other pictures and expect us to believe it?

Sorry it's just too implausible.

As for my calculations, they're the best one's on the board and I did two different analyses and got just about the same answer. If you don't like them, provide a counter-argument rather than ascertions that they're incorrect.

 

[Cobalt Blue]

[quote author=john_jones9 link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#21 date=04/23/04 at 16:07:54]

Coming from a guy with a picture of a thick bulge running down the side of his shorts that's a bit of a ridiculous statement.

I mean come on, you have as an avatar some picture that's supposed to be you with a bulge that looks nowhere near 13" long, unless you're 7' tall and then tell us you have no other pictures and expect us to believe it?

Sorry it's just too implausible.

As for my calculations, they're the best one's on the board and I did two different analyses and got just about the same answer. If you don't like them, provide a counter-argument rather than ascertions that they're incorrect.[/quote]
Hey, I'm with you john_jones9
Good to see someone constructively exposing the fakers/hyperbole merchants and downright liars on this board.
Keep up the good work!

 

[13788]

Faircrest: Look, I do not know who is telling the truth on this board. I do have a hard time believing some of these people (especially the its 20 inches.....rock hard....splitting underwear crowd.) But it is certainly plausible that he (rangersean) does have the equipment he purports. I just dont think it matters. There are Fakers....shame on them. Lets get back to the support aspect of the board, and let everything else fall into place.

Ken

 

[13788]

rangersean: First JJ, here and throughout the rest of this forum you've become just an asshole. You're acting more like a size queen who's frustrated we won't provide you with free porn.

Regarding your "calculations" - as I mentioned in my first reply your assumption that height or manufactured bra size (not even real breast size - you just use the size bras are made!) has ANYTHING to do with the either the distribution or physical or biological limitations on penis size is FALSE ON THE FACE OF IT, your "calculations" are total crap. All conclusions you draw from those calculations are crap almost by definition.

So what if you're the only one providing "calculations." If they're crap, their crap.

And like I said - it matters not at all whether I'm the liar you call me, or whether you believe I am - you are full of crap. Unless of course, you can provide us all with your full resume including your substantial statistical, moprho- and biometric background that allows you to make such sweeping claims from faulty data wrongly analyzed - and PROVE that your not! After all - you're asking for proof, you should provide your own.

That's the end of my participation in this farce.

 

[13788]

hung9mike: [quote author=Mr. Big Stuff link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#23 date=04/23/04 at 17:01:59]Look, I do not know who is telling the truth on this board... I just dont think it matters.
Ken[/quote]
Hey guys, I'm with Mr. Big Stuff on this one. There are, without a doubt, a good many fakers on this board. But honestly, what does it matter. If they're fake, chances are you'll figure it out and move on. Some may be more obviously fake than others, it's not for me to decide what their motives are. Maybe the point of this board is to support everyone who comes here, both the large and the ones that wish they were.

 

[Pappy]

I agree with Hung9Mike and Mr.B. This is a SUPPORT GROUP, NOT a take a picture and prove your size group.

 

[B_Jeremy]

Exactly, I'm sure there are non-believers of my size, but im not here to prove anything. I'm simply here to ask for advice, and give advice when I feel I can give good insight.

 

[monsternmypant]

[quote author=FootLongTeen link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#27 date=04/24/04 at 13:38:54]Exactly, I'm sure there are non-believers of my size, but im not here to prove anything. I'm simply here to ask for advice, and give advice when I feel I can give good insight.[/quote]

The Gentleman from Virginia rises in support!

 

[B_Jeremy]

[quote author=monsternmypant link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#28 date=04/24/04 at 14:24:44]

The Gentleman from Virginia rises in support![/quote]

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? Huh?????????

 

[Pecker]

[quote author=FootLongTeen link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#29 date=04/24/04 at 14:39:33]

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? Huh?????????[/quote]


The Gentleman from Virginia:

Col. Hugh J. Penis, an excitable but amorous fellow who always rises to the occasion when in good company.

 

[manta88ray]

[quote author=monsternmypant link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#28 date=04/24/04 at 14:24:44]

The Gentleman from Virginia rises in support![/quote]

Actually he's speaking of the future lobbyist/lawyer in Virginia... namely himself... I think I'll side with Gubernogin, FLT, and Monsternmypant on this one... the site is about support... not haul it out and see whose is biggest... just my nickles worth of advice...

 

[13788]

john_jones9: [quote author=rangersean link=board=youth;num=1081441952;start=20#24 date=04/23/04 at 23:14:13]First JJ, here and throughout the rest of this forum you've become just an asshole. You're acting more like a size queen who's frustrated we won't provide you with free porn.

Regarding your "calculations" - as I mentioned in my first reply your assumption that height or manufactured bra size (not even real breast size - you just use the size bras are made!) has ANYTHING to do with the either the distribution or physical or biological limitations on penis size is FALSE ON THE FACE OF IT, your "calculations" are total crap. All conclusions you draw from those calculations are crap almost by definition.

So what if you're the only one providing "calculations." If they're crap, their crap.

And like I said - it matters not at all whether I'm the liar you call me, or whether you believe I am - you are full of crap. Unless of course, you can provide us all with your full resume including your substantial statistical, moprho- and biometric background that allows you to make such sweeping claims from faulty data wrongly analyzed - and PROVE that your not! After all - you're asking for proof, you should provide your own.

That's the end of my participation in this farce.[/quote]


I didn't claim to be anything special, If I would have claimed to have been an astronaut or a billionaire, then your demands of proof might be reasonable.

You're claiming to have a cock that measures 13x8. That's extreme and demands extreme skepiticality, if that's a word.

My calculations give a gross idea of the variations in size. I took two diseperate size measures (height and breast size) of human physiuqes and got about the same answer. That implies there's some truth there, at least to ten percent or so and even that degree of uncertainty puts your claims in the hard to believe catagory.

I'm sorry if I offended you. That wasn't my intent. My intent was to inject a bit of reality onto a supposed "support group" forum that has become over run by fantasy. I didn't request pics for free pornography. I can find that very easily other places. I requested the proof as an experiment and found that only three (I just got another doctored pic today, but I'm not naming names) people responded and none of them provided convincing evidence.