Originally posted by Max+May 8 2005, 07:21 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Max @ May 8 2005, 07:21 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by motlissof@May 8 2005, 03:32 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Max
@May 7 2005, 07:36 AM
I think one factor in my case may be that over the years there has been a gradual but steady increase in my resting flaccid size; I used to be more of a grower, less so now, so the inflow of blood required is probably less. Unlike Donk I don't find that a really class A erection needs stimulation to maintain it; but in any case when I get one I find it almost impossible not to take some sort of action or another.
[post=308864]Quoted post[/post]
Any numbers to support your contention of enlarging flaccid size. If you could bottle that somehow, it would be invaluable in helping those with large penises more easily get a super erection as life progresses. You lucky dog.
[post=309079]Quoted post[/post]
I'm not sure that it is anything more than the mechanism by means of which the penis gets soft after orgasm not working so efficiently as I got older. To put it another way, a gradual loss of elasticity. Does that make sense?
Maybe not that remarkable to you, but you are the one with this phenomenon so I suppose it does not surprise, but does interest you. Along with the increase in flaccid length have you also noted that the girth also stays closer to its erect size. I still have huge size difference in totally flaccid and totally erect and am just a few days younger than Methusalah -- would not mind having your problem and having a sizable penis even when flaccid just as constant reminder of advantage we have in size department. Elasticity loss???? Not sure of that either, blood is the difference in flaccid and erect and you must for some reason be storing more blood there continually. Have you done any exercises to promote better blood flow and retention in the penis?
Difficult to give figures, since like everyone else's, my flaccid size has always varied a lot, depending on temperature, how fit I am, how long since I came, etc etc. [One possible additional reason ... global warming B) . Here in this part of the UK at least it seems 20 years since we had a really hard winter ... and temperatures at all times of the year have risen -- if we get another cold one, I'll let you know the effect.
]
As a young guy I would never have been less than 6" or 6.25" totally soft (but how much of the time did that apply?), usually a bit more. Later on the rare occasions I checked I would find an average of about 7". Now 7" is the effective minimum, and I can often be up to 8" or so and still be totally unaroused. Only an inch difference, and over a lot of years ... so not that remarkable really.
[post=309177]Quoted post[/post]
[/b][/quote]