Hey so i've been edging my cock for quite a while now and i javent cum for about a week, wondering of its safe to hold my cum or should i just let it go?
Is it safe to hold my cum after a week?
- Thread starter Ridongulous
- Start date
Not unsafe - but I think the worst you might run into is causing blue balls, which can apparently be painful! I've never gone a week without cumming since after a few days I find the constant sex drive to be too distracting.
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2017
- Posts
- 9,164
- Media
- 14
- Likes
- 17,969
- Points
- 808
- Location
- Arkansas, United States of America
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I'm on 12 days today and going to release massively at some point today! I've gone almost 7 weeks back when I was 21/22 years old, it was amazing to finally cum after the hiatus. I find 7 day break to be the best though. Testosterone is naturally at its highest and it can make for some massive cumshots and super satisfying orgasm taboot!
Please report on how powerful the ejaculation is and the quantity of semen.
Evenflow618
Superior Member
Good keep the semen retention going, focus on your breathing as well as positive thoughts
That depends what you mean by safe. In the short term, nothing bad will happen. Someone mentioned blue balls, but that isn't a threat to your health. Nothing will burst, though you may end up having a wet dream.
Longer term, a link has been found between ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer risk, i.e. you you seldom ejaculation your risk is higher than if you ejaculate often. At least 21 times/month was a suggested frequency.
But that doesn't mean that frequent ejaculation guarantees that you won't get prostate cancer or that infrequent ejaculation guarantees that you will.
Longer term, a link has been found between ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer risk, i.e. you you seldom ejaculation your risk is higher than if you ejaculate often. At least 21 times/month was a suggested frequency.
But that doesn't mean that frequent ejaculation guarantees that you won't get prostate cancer or that infrequent ejaculation guarantees that you will.
In short: our animal species isn’t evolved to do that, or more accurately, we are evolved to ejaculate frequently.
Well, in the short term there is a considerable chance of contracting aspecific prostatitis, and if you abstain a bit longer, there is a very real chance of epididymal blow-outs (surprisingly common and may potentially negatively impact your sperm production). Long-term prostatitis can lead to cyst-like encapsulations in the prostate that can drive hyperplasia and also cause complaints when ejaculating.
Also, the testosterone production goes up if you ejaculate frequently. And will go down if you don’t. Long-term abstinence can have a lasting effect on T-production
That is actually not true. Also, long-term abstinence has been found to correlate to antibodies against one’s own sperm. And it can also lead to depressive episodes (probably due to lowered T)
It’s not a guarantee, but there is a very real chance.
TL;DR: not ejaculating regularly has all kinds of negative effects, whereas frequent ejaculation has none.
For those seeking a more powerful ejaculation: kegels, prostate stimulation, and edging before ejaculation all lead to improved orgasms. The perceived ‘force’ of ejaculation after abstinence for more than 48 hrs is largely subjective, ie, it feels more powerful because you have been craving an orgasm.
But light bondage and a partner willing to edge you should lead to similarly powerful orgasms without the drawback of abstinence
The one thing I can guarantee you is that having an ejaculatory pattern that low will definitely have a negative impact on your training results…
Can you provide a reference for that in connection with voluntary abstinence? Searching it, I got lots of references to that happening after a closed vasectomy, but isn't that a rather different situation? Likewise, the papers dealing with the immune system being activated by one's own sperm were also connected with vasectomies and this was being studied in connection with the likely success of vasectomy reversal.
When the vas deferens has had the cut end closed off, yes of course there will be an increase in pressure before that closed end. That also seems to link into the immune system in that it seems the expansion of the closed vas deferens and epididymis continues until the stretching causes some minor damage to the inside surface. At that point a chemical marker attracts an immune response, i.e. a response that is there to deal with damage from pathogens, or damage to the skin that would let pathogens in. Up until then the immune cells have been kept away from the sperm as the sperm, being haploid, would not be recognised as native cells and would be destroyed, which is exactly how that increased pressure is then resolved.
In the case of voluntary abstinence, bear in mind I am not a urologist or even a doctor, but I have never seen any sphincters shown anywhere on the vas deferens or ejaculatory duct on anatomical diagrams. There is one upstream of the prostate, at the neck of the bladder (internal urethral sphincter) whose only involvement in ejaculation is to block semen from going into the bladder, and one downstream of the prostate, (the external urethral sphincter) which must necessarily open for urination as well as ejaculation. What I think that means is that, even without ejaculation, if more sperm are pushed into the ampulla of the vas deferens when it is already full, it would push the older ones along until they arrived at the end of the ejaculatory duct and ended up in the prostatic urethra, from where they would be washed out when urinating. The same should hold true of the glands that produce the liquid, though the prostate being full of highly concentrated prostatic fluid has been proposed as a factor in prostate cancer, i.e. an explanation for the observation that more frequent ejaculation lowers the risk.
I can be very short about it: I’ve witnessed blow-outs, spermatocoele, as well as aspecific prostatitis in much, much greater numbers than expected in (post-)adolescents and young adults who all fell victim to that current ‘no fap’/‘semen retention’ craze.
As for the increased pressure after vasectomy, that’s actually a much greater problem than most will have you believe. I’ve come to the point of advising against vasectomies as the chance of long-term problems is considerable.
There is a very rare ailment where men suffer from hangover-like after an ejaculation. Other that that, it’s just the power of suggestion: psychosomatic complaints.
It is probably safer to "just let it go" because holding it just makes things sticky and unsanitary -- not to mention awkward when you have to shake someone's hand.
elklindoxxx
Superior Member
I think it may be affecting you're grammar and spelling as well. Perhaps you should relieve your stress....
Similar threads
