Noel and curtis fuck each other simultaneously at sean cody

[candreas]

Wow! You don't get to see this often in porn! Noel and Curtis fuck each other simultaneously in reverse piledriver. More photos and videos here!

 

[1g5463]

Extremely hot. I can't take their claims of heterosexuality seriously though.

 

[jdoe86]

Tried that once. The mechanics are hard as hell. Of course it helped that the other guy had a long cock. Only lasted a few minutes before we gave up though.

 

[davey3932]

I think Curtis is definitely a closet case. His FB is so hate filled/Tea Party nuts, and unless he is a gifted actor, he seems to really enjoy making those videos. It's probably the only time he can be himself because of the angry community he is part of. He just got married too, that girl must be nuts.

 

[notN2pussy]

Interesting? But does not look very satisfying to me, perhaps even painful.

 

[1418052]

Wow! You don't get to see this often in porn! Noel and Curtis fuck each other simultaneously in reverse piledriver. More photos and videos here!

Curtis CRAVES big thick dick in his ass

 

[tarheel6]

I think Curtis is definitely a closet case. His FB is so hate filled/Tea Party nuts, and unless he is a gifted actor, he seems to really enjoy making those videos. It's probably the only time he can be himself because of the angry community he is part of. He just got married too, that girl must be nuts.

Or he wants/needs the money.

It's interesting how many of these porn guys seem to be super right wing in their politics. I don't think it's tied to their sexual identities, being closeted or self-hating, etc. Think Jake Porter -- he's bat-shit Trump crazy but isn't closeted. IMO, people post all sorts of stuff that would be better left either unsaid or shared with a close circle of acquaintances rather than broadcast to the world. I suspect I'm in the minority w/r/t that view.

 

[878103]

Both are as bent as a hairpin. All that str8 shit is a fantasy for fools.

 

[bigboaster]

Or he wants/needs the money.

It's interesting how many of these porn guys seem to be super right wing in their politics. I don't think it's tied to their sexual identities, being closeted or self-hating, etc. Think Jake Porter -- he's bat-shit Trump crazy but isn't closeted. IMO, people post all sorts of stuff that would be better left either unsaid or shared with a close circle of acquaintances rather than broadcast to the world. I suspect I'm in the minority w/r/t that view.

Studies have found guys with homophobic views tend to get more stimulated by gay porn. I do think there is a correlation between political views and sexuality. Look at how many closet cases eight wing politicians get exposed every year. Those repub types are far more likely to be self hating, closeted and homophobic

 

[tarheel6]

Studies have found guys with homophobic views tend to get more stimulated by gay porn. I do think there is a correlation between political views and sexuality. Look at how many closet cases eight wing politicians get exposed every year. Those repub types are far more likely to be self hating, closeted and homophobic

And there are quite a few Democratic officeholders who are gay, too. A politician being closeted has as much to do with their constituency as it does with internalized homophobia.

There are some homophobes who are gay and in denial or want to mask their sexual orientation. So, the studies you site make sense to me. But there are others who are homophobic and not at all aroused by watching gay sex.

But we started out discussing straight guys doing gay porn and whether being right-wing politically suggests their really closeted gays in denial. I'd think performing in gay porn would be more threatening to open the closet door than an expression of political views that are held by people who are also anti-gay. To my knowledge, I've never seen or heard of anything overtly homophobic or anti-gay attributable to Curtis. At most, you can infer that fair and equal treatment of gay people is not atop his political concerns because he supports politicians despite their anit-gay stances. There is nothing to support that it's their anti-gay positions that are the reason for his supporting them.

 

[bigboaster]

And there are quite a few Democratic officeholders who are gay, too. A politician being closeted has as much to do with their constituency as it does with internalized homophobia.

There are some homophobes who are gay and in denial or want to mask their sexual orientation. So, the studies you site make sense to me. But there are others who are homophobic and not at all aroused by watching gay sex.

But we started out discussing straight guys doing gay porn and whether being right-wing politically suggests their really closeted gays in denial. I'd think performing in gay porn would be more threatening to open the closet door than an expression of political views that are held by people who are also anti-gay. To my knowledge, I've never seen or heard of anything overtly homophobic or anti-gay attributable to Curtis. At most, you can infer that fair and equal treatment of gay people is not atop his political concerns because he supports politicians despite their anit-gay stances. There is nothing to support that it's their anti-gay positions that are the reason for his supporting them.

I mean sure, it's not restricted to just republicans solely. Seems fair. Location, religious status etc. likely all play a role.

Never claimed it was all homophobes who have secret gay desires. Of course there are homophobes who are not turned by gay sex. I would argue the majority are not. Just an interesting observation I wanted to point out is all.

My position remains that, given all the circumstancial evidence, it would not be an absurd conclusion to consider that Curtis is a closet case. Sure he has never been explicitly anti gay but by extension of being a republican in the south, He tacitly supports a party that wants to deny rights to lgbt people. All while he has copious amounts of gay sex on camera (for money). This is where the studies linking arousal and homophobia do come into play. It's easy to assume that all of this could result in a case of internalised homophobia (I think someone like Aaron Schock is a good example as well)

 

[tarheel6]

I mean sure, it's not restricted to just republicans solely. Seems fair. Location, religious status etc. likely all play a role.

Never claimed it was all homophobes who have secret gay desires. Of course there are homophobes who are not turned by gay sex. I would argue the majority are not. Just an interesting observation I wanted to point out is all.

My position remains that, given all the circumstancial evidence, it would not be an absurd conclusion to consider that Curtis is a closet case. Sure he has never been explicitly anti gay but by extension of being a republican in the south, He tacitly supports a party that wants to deny rights to lgbt people. All while he has copious amounts of gay sex on camera (for money). This is where the studies linking arousal and homophobia do come into play. It's easy to assume that all of this could result in a case of internalised homophobia (I think someone like Aaron Schock is a good example as well)

We may be closer to agreeing than it appears. I agree its not an "absurd" conclusion that Curtis is a closet case. But I'm not sure absurdity is the standard. If it were a crime to be closeted, the standard of proof would be beyond a reasonable doubt. That's too strict to be useful. The one I'd employ is whether the "evidence" makes it more likely than not that he's closeted rather than a straight man willing to have gay sex for money.

I see the logic in inferring from his political views that he's antigay, I simply disagree with it. There are plenty of Trump supporters, even vocal ones, who deplore his racism, sexism, xenophobia and homophobia. They just think he's better for the economy than a Democrat would be, and his deplorable views and acts don't outweigh what they like about him. I disagree with them both about whether Trump is better for the economy and the weight that should be given to his divisive, discriminatory, and violence encouraging crap.

Shock is a much clearer case. He attempted to hide his homosexuality until he was both run out of Congress and outed by a first-hand witness. Curtis, in contrast, openly performs gay sex acts for widespread distribution, but gives no other direct evidence of being gay in his life outside of porn.

But I ultimately don't think it matters whether Curtis is gay and closeted or gay4pay. He holds no office or position of power where internalized homophobia, if any, would impact my life. If he performs well and it arouses me to watch, I'll enjoy it. If he doesn't, I won't. That's the extent of impact he has on me.

 

[bigboaster]

We may be closer to agreeing than it appears. I agree its not an "absurd" conclusion that Curtis is a closet case. But I'm not sure absurdity is the standard. If it were a crime to be closeted, the standard of proof would be beyond a reasonable doubt. That's too strict to be useful. The one I'd employ is whether the "evidence" makes it more likely than not that he's closeted rather than a straight man willing to have gay sex for money.

I see the logic in inferring from his political views that he's antigay, I simply disagree with it. There are plenty of Trump supporters, even vocal ones, who deplore his racism, sexism, xenophobia and homophobia. They just think he's better for the economy than a Democrat would be, and his deplorable views and acts don't outweigh what they like about him. I disagree with them both about whether Trump is better for the economy and the weight that should be given to his divisive, discriminatory, and violence encouraging crap.

Shock is a much clearer case. He attempted to hide his homosexuality until he was both run out of Congress and outed by a first-hand witness. Curtis, in contrast, openly performs gay sex acts for widespread distribution, but gives no other direct evidence of being gay in his life outside of porn.

But I ultimately don't think it matters whether Curtis is gay and closeted or gay4pay. He holds no office or position of power where internalized homophobia, if any, would impact my life. If he performs well and it arouses me to watch, I'll enjoy it. If he doesn't, I won't. That's the extent of impact he has on me.

Don't have too much to add tbh. Perfectly reasonable and logical response. I don't disagree with anything here. Thanks for the discussion

 

[1418052]

Don't have too much to add tbh. Perfectly reasonable and logical response. I don't disagree with anything here. Thanks for the discussion

Curtis is in a movie Gay4PAy

It is on Amazon Prime video

 

[bigboaster]

Curtis is in a movie Gay4PAy

It is on Amazon Prime video

I know about this documentary for a while now, it's been a few years I think, don't really care to see it tbh

 

[nukahguy]

Being closeted and right wing/self hating is not that shocking. I know people that were forced to repress their sexual desires because of being raised in extreme conservative families. Men, specially, are taught from a young age to "be a man" and anything that looks different is bad, sinful and evil. This is specially in "red states" in the USA and in small very conservative towns (think Texas Bible belt or anywhere in the South).

Curtis is hot as hell though, I have cum so many times watching him fuck and get hot. In spite of his personal views, he is one of my Sean Cody favorites. It is a shame about his politics, but I guess everyone is entitled to their opinions, just sucks that it is so disgusting.

 

[jdunhill]

Dream catch. 10/10. Such a sweety