Only Boxers And Boxer Briefs

Looks like I'll be the first to talk about traditional boxers.. I guess because of the time period I grew up, even though at that time I did not like them, traditional, full boxer shorts were the standard and what men wore. Like anything else, after a while you identify with this and like it. I've experimented with all kinds of hot underwear over the years but when I see the crinkled waistband of regular boxers rising above the waistband of a guy's jeans or shorts it's an instant turn on for me. Like I said, to me they're what men wear. Recently I have reclaimed the awesome sensation of wearing full cut boxers under pants that allow full swing and zero dick confinement. I also love to see a young stud dressed impeccably with classic white boxers underneath.

So hot.

3550c138a93893d172f94c3e02198550.jpg
 
Regular boxers are cool but I like the separate waist band like American eagle or something. The plain Hanes ones were always awful in fit and I don’t like the way they look lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amc777
Cool pics- but why do you open a new thread? We got dozens already regarding boxer shorts, just checking the search box would avoid to get so many threads with the same subject instead of adding them to one existing. Please, be smart!
 
Cool pics- but why do you open a new thread? We got dozens already regarding boxer shorts, just checking the search box would avoid to get so many threads with the same subject instead of adding them to one existing. Please, be smart!

If it bothers you so much, be smart and don't come to the thread
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diazjr181
If it bothers you so much, be smart and don't come to the thread

I didn't do the mistake, YOU did. When you open a thread about boxers on a site that has been running for more than 20 years- I really ask if you are convinced to open something new? Dozens of others have done it before you and all mods recommend to check the search box before opening a new thread.

It is very confusing for members who search something special being forced to check that among dozens of threads instead of one (plus it's also wasted space as well). Don't blame others who are kindly asking to consider a logic handling.

And don't tell that I may not enter your thread. I won't post here anyway because I choose long running threads regarding boxers. But I guess I can say something that is a fact as a member who has been posting here for 14 years- don't you think so, buddy?
 
Last edited:
@Zombieman9822529

As you see I did post on your thread. I checked all 50 entries via search box and I say sorry, just very few threads contain "boxers" or "boxer briefs" as main content, dozens of threads the term is just component of underwear in general.

So my words were not appropriate and fair. Sorry. Please, let's forget it. Peace. Welcum on LPSG and your new thread. Can you forgive me?

Cheers- Ted (who was a little rascal)
 
  • Like
Reactions: John R. Anderson