Should AI images be banned on LPSG?

[5015wombat]

I see so many groups now, where AI images are being inserted, it's become quite difficult to tell the AI images apart from the real ones in some cases. I think AI generated images should be banned from these groups.

They could still be allowed on groups where people specifically want to see AI images, if that is the subject of the group, but in general on all non AI groups, they should be filtered out and deleted in my opinion.

Is it therefore possible, to have an AI detector, or a watermark on any AI images that state " ai generated"?

How do you feel about seeing AI images that seem 99% real?

Does it evoke the same feeling as a real photo that came from a camera's lens?
Or does it leave you feeling cold, IE is it unable to evoke an emotion in you?

 

[deleted26205071]

I think they should not be allowed - it just clogs up the place with bogus crap and I'd venture to guess legitimate actors/performers/models/etc would be more upset with convincing, yet bogus stuff floating around about them

Me, personally, I hate when sites mix the two (real/AI) and I have to figure out if I'm lusting after a cartoon or not. It's completely stupid imo

 

[Jon1971]

I think that AI generated and AI manipulated images (And to an extent, photoshopped images too) should be clearly marked, and only allowed in threads specifically for AI content.

 

[elijvhhaiden]

No this site is already stricked as it is jeesh

 

[ILoveGames48]

I think ai pics and vids should be banned not just for the reason of clogging up space but for the reason it’s like posting fake photos … no one wants to see them.. as for people posting them they can create a group for it

 

[5015wombat]

Eric200, Jon1972 and ILoveGames48, thank you I thought I might be alone, glad you agree.

 

[RJ5on1]

I think that AI generated and AI manipulated images (And to an extent, photoshopped images too) should be clearly marked, and only allowed in threads specifically for AI content.

^^^
This, I agree 100%!

 

[lowrisejoe]

I don't deliberately post AI images but can't always tell when one is

 

[1qazxsw2]

Not banned entirely, that’s absurd.

AI threads should be allowed, some AI images are so realistic and hot. But they should be clearly marked as AI/PS/EDITED. I agree they shouldn’t be allowed in regular threads.

 

[willow78]

I'm not a fan of AI/fake nudes.

I can understand editing or enhancing a picture to improve colour, brightness, picture quality, etc.

But I think an all-out *fake* drifts into the grey area of consent and revenge porn. There is a legal issue at play.

LPSG being strict is much better than LPSG being shut down.

 

[levi101]

I am seeing notes like this posted for all kinds of documents on the web..

The note "AI" is starting to be attached to many graphics when place on the web. I would like to see all manipulated graphics be noted as such but no banned. Just don't play with my mind.

 

[kingchristophe.2000]

Should AI Images Be Banned On LPSG?

Yes. I think my reasons are obvious.

 

[mikyang]

BANNED NO regulated YES Once you ban things it goes underground thats not good

 

[astiffguy]

AI nudes and other edited or fake pictures should only be posted in it's own forums, threads, or gallerys and be clearly marked as fake too, just for those out there who don't have a descerning eye to tell. It's usually pretty easy to spot an AI fake, but some people just don't see the differences. There are some neat AI and other fake ideas out there that are pretty cool, but when they will start popping up in regular threads and discussions you know that they are going to soon over-power everything and then drive alot of people to leave. My humble opinion they have no place intermixing with real pictures and discussion threads where they aren't welcome.

 

[Freeshavedbtm]

AI images should have their own threads, and should note they are indeed AI

 

[onyx93BBC]

I say no.

People will take private leaks and photos of celebrities and public figures and post them on here with little concern. At the very least with AI, you know it isn't real. Also, AI imaging capabilities aren't that good. It has a small niche pool of celebrity faces to emulate, and you can still see the glaring mistakes AI makes in its attempt to imitate reality. For those with a dull imagination, it's a fun way to see an image on screen that stimulates their arousal. Just don't even get me started on deepfakes and how horribly produced they are. AI Content having its own section is the best way to handle things.

 

[bigmatt1983]

I say no.

People will take private leaks and photos of celebrities and public figures and post them on here with little concern. At the very least with AI, you know it isn't real. Also, AI imaging capabilities aren't that good. It has a small niche pool of celebrity faces to emulate, and you can still see the glaring mistakes AI makes in its attempt to imitate reality. For those with a dull imagination, it's a fun way to see an image on screen that stimulates their arousal. Just don't even get me started on deepfakes and how horribly produced they are. AI Content having its own section is the best way to handle things.

Yea I found one of those AI nude generators and was playing around with it, its horrible at getting anything remotely close to what the original looks like.

 

[JBD_Mikk]

I think AI images should be banned everywhere outside of the "AI Content" section. (Personally I'd be happy if AI image generation didn't exist at all to begin with.)

 

[BD79]

I think that AI generated and AI manipulated images (And to an extent, photoshopped images too) should be clearly marked, and only allowed in threads specifically for AI content.

I agree with you!

 

[WilliamG]

Hopefully most all are now only in the AI forum no?