Uncut Guys Poll & Circumcision Thoughts

[jamesbuckingray]

Hey Guys,


I'm conducting a poll for uncut guys to gather some insights on foreskin coverage, retraction, hygiene, sensitivity, and thoughts on circumcision. If you're interested, take a few minutes to go through the questions below and share your responses! Feel free to answer as much or as little as you're comfortable with. Mine are filled out...

1. General Information​

• Age: 39
• Country/Cultural Background: USA

2. Foreskin Coverage​

• ☐ Fully covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Partially covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Does not cover the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Fully retractable when erect
• ☐ Partially retractable when erect
• ☐ Non-retractable (phimosis)

3. Retraction Information​

• Ease of retraction when flaccid:
  • ☐ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Ease of retraction when erect:
  • ☐ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Any discomfort or pain when retracting?
  • ☐ No discomfort
  • ☐ Slight discomfort
  • ☐ Painful
  • ☐ Tears or tightness occur
• Does the foreskin stay behind the glans when retracted?
  • ☐ Yes, stays back easily
  • ☐ Stays back but rolls forward sometimes
  • ☐ Always rolls forward immediately

4. Appearance​

• Color: ☐ Pink ☐ Brown ☐ Darker than shaft ☐ Same as shaft
• Thickness: ☐ Thin ☐ Medium ☐ Thick
• Frenulum: ☐ Prominent ☐ Normal ☐ Not noticeable
• Ridges/Wrinkles: ☐ Smooth ☐ Some ridges ☐ Very wrinkled

5. Foreskin-Related Issues (if any)​

• ☐ Phimosis (tight foreskin)
• ☐ Paraphimosis (foreskin stuck behind glans)
• ☐ Frenulum breve (short frenulum)
• ☐ Irritation or sensitivity issues
• ☐ Infections (balanitis, UTIs, etc.)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

6. Hygiene & Smegma​

• Cleaning routine: ☐ Daily ☐ A few times a week ☐ Rarely
• Smegma presence: ☐ None ☐ Occasional ☐ Frequent buildup
• Odor: ☐ None ☐ Mild ☐ Strong

7. Sensitivity & Reactions​

• Glans sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Foreskin sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Reacts to: ☐ Soap ☐ Friction ☐ Lubricants ☐ Other: ______

8. Why Not Circumcised?​

• ☐ Personal choice
• ☐ Cultural/religious reasons
• ☐ Medical advice against it
• ☐ Parents' decision
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

9. Circumcision Thoughts​

Do You Want to Be Circumcised?​

• ☐ No, I want to remain uncut
• ☐ Yes, I am considering circumcision
• ☐ I am unsure

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Method:​

• ☐ Surgical (traditional scalpel)
• ☐ Laser circumcision
• ☐ Clamp method (e.g., Gomco, Plastibell, Mogen)
• ☐ PrePex (non-surgical device)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Style:​

• Tightness Preference:
  • ☐ Loose (some residual foreskin remains)
  • ☐ Moderate (balanced look)
  • ☐ Tight (no excess skin)
• Scar Placement Preference:
  • ☐ Low (scar closer to the glans)
  • ☐ High (scar closer to the base)
• Frenulum Handling:
  • ☐ Leave frenulum intact
  • ☐ Partial frenulum removal
  • ☐ Full frenulum removal

 

[Jagtstein]

Hallo Leute,


Ich führe eine Umfrage unter unbeschnittenen Männern durch, um Erkenntnisse über Vorhautbedeckung, Zurückziehen, Hygiene, Sensibilität und Gedanken zur Beschneidung zu sammeln. Wenn Sie interessiert sind, nehmen Sie sich ein paar Minuten Zeit, um die folgenden Fragen durchzugehen und Ihre Antworten mitzuteilen! Sie können so viel oder so wenig antworten, wie Sie möchten. Meine sind ausgefüllt...

1. Allgemeine Informationen​

• Alter: 79
• Land/Germany

2. Vorhautbedeckung​

• Bedeckt die Eichel im schlaffen Zustand vollständig
• ☐ Bedeckt im schlaffen Zustand teilweise die Eichel
• ☐ Bedeckt die Eichel im schlaffen Zustand nicht
• ☐ Im aufgestellten Zustand vollständig einziehbar
• ☐ Im aufgestellten Zustand teilweise einziehbar
• ☐ Nicht zurückziehbar (Phimose)

3. Widerrufsbelehrung​

• Leichtigkeit des Zurückziehens im schlaffen Zustand:
  • Sehr einfach
  • ☐ Etwas Aufwand erforderlich
  • ☐ Schwierig
  • ☐ Nicht möglich
• Einfaches Einziehen im aufrechten Zustand:
  • Sehr einfach
  • ☐ Etwas Aufwand erforderlich
  • ☐ Schwierig
  • ☐ Nicht möglich
• Gibt es beim Einziehen Beschwerden oder Schmerzen?
  • Keine Beschwerden
  • ☐ Leichtes Unbehagen
  • ☐ Schmerzhaft
  • ☐ Es treten Risse oder Verspannungen auf
• Bleibt die Vorhaut beim Zurückziehen hinter der Eichel?
  • Ja, bleibt leicht zurück
  • ☐ Bleibt zurück, rollt aber manchmal nach vorne
  • ☐ Rollt immer sofort vorwärts

4. Aussehen​

• Farbe: Rosa ☐ Braun ☐ Dunkler als Schaft ☐ Gleich wie Schaft
• Dicke: ☐ Dünn ☐ Mittel ☐ Dick
• Frenulum: ☐ Hervorstehend ☐ Normal ☐ Nicht wahrnehmbar
• Rillen/Falten: ☐ Glatt ☐ Einige Rillen ☐ Sehr faltig

5. Vorhautbezogene Probleme (falls vorhanden)​

• ☐ Phimose (Vorhautverengung)
• ☐ Paraphimose (Vorhaut steckt hinter der Eichel fest)
• ☐ Frenulum breve (kurzes Frenulum)
• ☐ Reizung oder Empfindlichkeitsprobleme
• ☐ Infektionen (Balanitis, Harnwegsinfektionen usw.)
• ☐ Andere: ___________________________

6. Hygiene und Smegma​

• Reinigungsroutine: Täglich ☐ Mehrmals pro Woche ☐ Selten
• Smegmavorkommen: ☐ Keines ☐ Gelegentlich ☐ Häufige Ansammlung
• Geruch: ☐ Keiner ☐ Mild ☐ Stark

7. Empfindlichkeit und Reaktionen​

• Empfindlichkeit der Eichel: ☐ Sehr empfindlich ☐ Normal Reduzierte Empfindlichkeit
• Vorhautempfindlichkeit: ☐ Sehr empfindlich ☐ Normal Reduzierte Empfindlichkeit
• Reagiert auf: ☐ Seife ☐ Reibung ☐ Schmiermittel ☐ Sonstiges: ______

8. Warum nicht beschnitten?​

• Persönliche Wahl
• ☐ Kulturelle/religiöse Gründe
• ☐ Medizinischer Rat dagegen
• ☐ Entscheidung der Eltern
• ☐ Andere: ___________________________

9. Gedanken zur Beschneidung​

Möchten Sie beschnitten werden?​

• Nein, ich möchte ungeschnitten bleiben
• ☐ Ja, ich denke über eine Beschneidung nach
• ☐ Ich bin mir nicht sicher

Falls ja, bevorzugte Beschneidungsmethode:​

• ☐ Chirurgisch (herkömmliches Skalpell)
• ☐ Laserbeschneidung
• ☐ Klemmmethode (z. B. Gomco, Plastibell, Mogen)
• ☐ PrePex (nicht-chirurgisches Gerät)
• ☐ Andere: ___________________________

Falls ja, bevorzugte Beschneidungsart:​

• Dichtigkeitspräferenz:
  • ☐ Locker (es bleiben Reste der Vorhaut übrig)
  • ☐ Moderat (ausgewogenes Aussehen)
  • ☐ Straff (keine überschüssige Haut)
• Bevorzugte Narbenplatzierung:
  • ☐ Niedrig (Narbe näher an der Eichel)
  • ☐ Hoch (Narbe näher an der Basis)
• Umgang mit dem Frenulum:
  • ☐ Frenulum intakt lassen
  • ☐ Teilweise Entfernung des Frenulums
  • Vollständige Frenulumentfernung

 

[art]

Hey guys


I'm conducting a poll for uncut guys to gather some insights on foreskin coverage, retraction, hygiene, sensitivity, and thoughts on circumcision. If you're interested, take a few minutes to go through the questions below and share your responses! Feel free to answer as much or as little as you're comfortable with. Mine are filled out...

1. General Information​

• Age: 71
• Country/Cultural Background: USA

2. Foreskin Coverage​

• ☐ Fully covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Partially covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Does not cover the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Fully retractable when erect
• ☐ Partially retractable when erect
• ☐ Non-retractable (phimosis)

3. Retraction Information​

• Ease of retraction when flaccid:
  • ☐ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Ease of retraction when erect:
  • ☐ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Any discomfort or pain when retracting?
  • ☐ No discomfort
  • ☐ Slight discomfort
  • ☐ Painful
  • ☐ Tears or tightness occur
• Does the foreskin stay behind the glans when retracted?
  • ☐ Yes, stays back easily
  • ☐ Stays back but rolls forward sometimes
  • ☐ Always rolls forward immediately

4. Appearance​

• Color: ☐ Pink ☐ Brown ☐ Darker than shaft ☐ Same as shaft
• Thickness: ☐ Thin ☐ Medium ☐ Thick
• Frenulum: ☐ Prominent ☐ Normal ☐ Not noticeable
• Ridges/Wrinkles: ☐ Smooth ☐ Some ridges ☐ Very wrinkled

5. Foreskin-Related Issues (if any)​

• ☐ Phimosis (tight foreskin)
• ☐ Paraphimosis (foreskin stuck behind glans)
• ☐ Frenulum breve (short frenulum)
• ☐ Irritation or sensitivity issues
• ☐ Infections (balanitis, UTIs, etc.)
• ☐ Other: _None__________________________

Hygiene & Smegma​

• Cleaning routine: ☐ Daily ☐ A few times a week ☐ Rarely
• Smegma presence: ☐ None ☐ Occasional ☐ Frequent buildup
• Odor: ☐ None ☐ Mild ☐ Strong

Sensitivity & Reactions​

• Glans sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Foreskin sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Reacts to: ☐ Soap ☐ Friction ☐ Lubricants ☐ Other: Tongue

8. Why Not Circumcised?​

• ☐ Personal choice
• ☐ Cultural/religious reasons
• ☐ Medical advice against it
• ☐ Parents' decision
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

9. Circumcision Thoughts​

Do You Want to Be Circumcised?​

• ☐ No, I want to remain uncut
• ☐ Yes, I am considering circumcision
• ☐ I am unsure

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Method:​

• ☐ Surgical (traditional scalpel)
• ☐ Laser circumcision
• ☐ Clamp method (e.g., Gomco, Plastibell, Mogen)
• ☐ PrePex (non-surgical device)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Style:​

• Tightness Preference:
  • ☐ Loose (some residual foreskin remains)
  • ☐ Moderate (balanced look)
  • ☐ Tight (no excess skin)
• Scar Placement Preference:
  • ☐ Low (scar closer to the glans)
  • ☐ High (scar closer to the base)
• Frenulum Handling:
  • ☐ Leave frenulum intact
  • ☐ Partial frenulum removal
  • ☐ Full frenulum removal

 

[RandomBisexual53]

1. General Information​

• Age: 28
• Country/Cultural Background: France

2. Foreskin Coverage​

• ◘ Fully covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Partially covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Does not cover the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Fully retractable when erect
• ☐ Partially retractable when erect
• ☐ Non-retractable (phimosis)

3. Retraction Information​

• Ease of retraction when flaccid:
  • ◘ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Ease of retraction when erect:
  • ◘ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Any discomfort or pain when retracting?
  • ◘ No discomfort
  • ☐ Slight discomfort
  • ☐ Painful
  • ☐ Tears or tightness occur
• Does the foreskin stay behind the glans when retracted?
  • ◘ Yes, stays back easily
  • ☐ Stays back but rolls forward sometimes
  • ☐ Always rolls forward immediately

4. Appearance​

• Color: ☐ Pink ☐ Brown ☐ Darker than shaft ◘ Same as shaft
• Thickness: ☐ Thin ◘ Medium ☐ Thick
• Frenulum: ◘ Prominent ☐ Normal ☐ Not noticeable
• Ridges/Wrinkles: ☐ Smooth ◘ Some ridges ☐ Very wrinkled

5. Foreskin-Related Issues (if any)​

• ☐ Phimosis (tight foreskin)
• ☐ Paraphimosis (foreskin stuck behind glans)
• ☐ Frenulum breve (short frenulum)
• ☐ Irritation or sensitivity issues
• ☐ Infections (balanitis, UTIs, etc.)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

6. Hygiene & Smegma​

• Cleaning routine: ◘ Daily ☐ A few times a week ☐ Rarely
• Smegma presence: ◘ None ☐ Occasional ☐ Frequent buildup
• Odor: ◘ None ☐ Mild ☐ Strong

7. Sensitivity & Reactions​

• Glans sensitivity: ◘ Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Foreskin sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive ◘ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Reacts to: ☐ Soap ☐ Friction ☐ Lubricants ☐ Other: ______

8. Why Not Circumcised?​

• ☐ Personal choice
• ☐ Cultural/religious reasons
• ☐ Medical advice against it
• ☐ Parents' decision
• ◘ Other: Noone does it here (except muslim and jewish folks)

9. Circumcision Thoughts​

Do You Want to Be Circumcised?​

• ◘ No, I want to remain uncut
• ☐ Yes, I am considering circumcision
• ☐ I am unsure

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Method:​

• ☐ Surgical (traditional scalpel)
• ☐ Laser circumcision
• ☐ Clamp method (e.g., Gomco, Plastibell, Mogen)
• ☐ PrePex (non-surgical device)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Style:​

• Tightness Preference:
  • ☐ Loose (some residual foreskin remains)
  • ☐ Moderate (balanced look)
  • ☐ Tight (no excess skin)
• Scar Placement Preference:
  • ☐ Low (scar closer to the glans)
  • ☐ High (scar closer to the base)
• Frenulum Handling:
  • ☐ Leave frenulum intact
  • ☐ Partial frenulum removal
  • ☐ Full frenulum removal

 

[Notlikeskywalker]

1. General Information​

• Age: 31
• Country/Cultural Background: White/British

2. Foreskin Coverage​

• X Fully covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Partially covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Does not cover the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Fully retractable when erect
• ☐ Partially retractable when erect
• ☐ Non-retractable (phimosis)

3. Retraction Information​

• Ease of retraction when flaccid:
  • X Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Ease of retraction when erect:
  • X Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Any discomfort or pain when retracting?
  • X No discomfort
  • ☐ Slight discomfort
  • ☐ Painful
  • ☐ Tears or tightness occur
• Does the foreskin stay behind the glans when retracted?
  • ☐ Yes, stays back easily
  • X Stays back but rolls forward sometimes
  • ☐ Always rolls forward immediately

4. Appearance​

• Color: ☐ Pink ☐ Brown ☐ Darker than shaft
  X Same as shaft
• Thickness: X Thin ☐ Medium ☐ Thick
• Frenulum: ☐ Prominent X Normal[/B] ☐ Not noticeable
• Ridges/Wrinkles: X Smooth ☐ Some ridges ☐ Very wrinkled

5. Foreskin-Related Issues (if any)​

• ☐ Phimosis (tight foreskin)
• ☐ Paraphimosis (foreskin stuck behind glans)
• ☐ Frenulum breve (short frenulum)
• ☐ Irritation or sensitivity issues
• ☐ Infections (balanitis, UTIs, etc.)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

6. Hygiene & Smegma​

• Cleaning routine: X Daily ☐ A few times a week ☐ Rarely
• Smegma presence: X None ☐ Occasional ☐ Frequent buildup
• Odor: X None ☐ Mild ☐ Strong

7. Sensitivity & Reactions​

• Glans sensitivity: X Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Foreskin sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive X Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Reacts to: ☐ Soap ☐ Friction ☐ Lubricants ☐ Other: ______

8. Why Not Circumcised?​

• ☐ Personal choice
• ☐ Cultural/religious reasons
• ☐ Medical advice against it
• X Parents' decision
• ☐ Other: Not usual practice in UK

9. Circumcision Thoughts​

Unnecessary for the most part but I wouldn't go as far as to consider it mutilation.

Do You Want to Be Circumcised?​

• X No, I want to remain uncut
• ☐ Yes, I am considering circumcision
• ☐ I am unsure

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Method:​

• ☐ Surgical (traditional scalpel)
• ☐ Laser circumcision
• ☐ Clamp method (e.g., Gomco, Plastibell, Mogen)
• ☐ PrePex (non-surgical device)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Style:​

• Tightness Preference:
  • ☐ Loose (some residual foreskin remains)
  • ☐ Moderate (balanced look)
  • ☐ Tight (no excess skin)
• Scar Placement Preference:
  • ☐ Low (scar closer to the glans)
  • ☐ High (scar closer to the base)
• Frenulum Handling:
  • ☐ Leave frenulum intact
  • ☐ Partial frenulum removal
  • ☐ Full frenulum removal

[/QUOTE]

 

[freeballerlondon]

Hey Guys,


I'm conducting a poll for uncut guys to gather some insights on foreskin coverage, retraction, hygiene, sensitivity, and thoughts on circumcision. If you're interested, take a few minutes to go through the questions below and share your responses! Feel free to answer as much or as little as you're comfortable with. Mine are filled out...

Could you please stop using that oxymoron ‘uncut’?
The antonym of circumcised is natural or intact. “Uncut” is similar to “Unincomplete” as antonym for “incomplete”

 

[Notlikeskywalker]

Could you please stop using that oxymoron ‘uncut’?
The antonym of circumcised is natural or intact. “Uncut” is similar to “Unincomplete” as antonym for “incomplete”

By using the phrase "natural" you'd be implying a sense of shame that those who are circumcised are unnatural or abnormal, which is not what we want to do.

 

[freeballerlondon]

By using the phrase "natural" you'd be implying a sense of shame that those who are circumcised are unnatural or abnormal, which is not what we want to do.

“Unnatural” is a possible, but not the only antonym, and in itself has multiple meanings (one of which is accurate, and not synonymous with ‘abnormal’).
In this context, the antonym of natural is ‘modified’ or ‘altered’, which is a correct description of a penis following prepucectomy.

 

[NotAHeterosexual]

Hey Guys,


I'm conducting a poll for uncut guys to gather some insights on foreskin coverage, retraction, hygiene, sensitivity, and thoughts on circumcision. If you're interested, take a few minutes to go through the questions below and share your responses! Feel free to answer as much or as little as you're comfortable with. Mine are filled out...

1. General Information​

• Age: 39
• Country/Cultural Background: USA

2. Foreskin Coverage​

• ☐ Fully covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Partially covers the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Does not cover the glans when flaccid
• ☐ Fully retractable when erect
• ☐ Partially retractable when erect
• ☐ Non-retractable (phimosis)

3. Retraction Information​

• Ease of retraction when flaccid:
  • ☐ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Ease of retraction when erect:
  • ☐ Very easy
  • ☐ Some effort needed
  • ☐ Difficult
  • ☐ Not possible
• Any discomfort or pain when retracting?
  • ☐ No discomfort
  • ☐ Slight discomfort
  • ☐ Painful
  • ☐ Tears or tightness occur
• Does the foreskin stay behind the glans when retracted?
  • ☐ Yes, stays back easily
  • ☐ Stays back but rolls forward sometimes
  • ☐ Always rolls forward immediately

4. Appearance​

• Color: ☐ Pink ☐ Brown ☐ Darker than shaft ☐ Same as shaft
• Thickness: ☐ Thin ☐ Medium ☐ Thick
• Frenulum: ☐ Prominent ☐ Normal ☐ Not noticeable
• Ridges/Wrinkles: ☐ Smooth ☐ Some ridges ☐ Very wrinkled

5. Foreskin-Related Issues (if any)​

• ☐ Phimosis (tight foreskin)
• ☐ Paraphimosis (foreskin stuck behind glans)
• ☐ Frenulum breve (short frenulum)
• ☐ Irritation or sensitivity issues
• ☐ Infections (balanitis, UTIs, etc.)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

6. Hygiene & Smegma​

• Cleaning routine: ☐ Daily ☐ A few times a week ☐ Rarely
• Smegma presence: ☐ None ☐ Occasional ☐ Frequent buildup
• Odor: ☐ None ☐ Mild ☐ Strong

7. Sensitivity & Reactions​

• Glans sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Foreskin sensitivity: ☐ Very sensitive ☐ Normal ☐ Reduced sensitivity
• Reacts to: ☐ Soap ☐ Friction ☐ Lubricants ☐ Other: ______

8. Why Not Circumcised?​

• ☐ Personal choice
• ☐ Cultural/religious reasons
• ☐ Medical advice against it
• ☐ Parents' decision
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

9. Circumcision Thoughts​

Do You Want to Be Circumcised?​

• ☐ No, I want to remain uncut
• ☐ Yes, I am considering circumcision
• ☐ I am unsure

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Method:​

• ☐ Surgical (traditional scalpel)
• ☐ Laser circumcision
• ☐ Clamp method (e.g., Gomco, Plastibell, Mogen)
• ☐ PrePex (non-surgical device)
• ☐ Other: ___________________________

If Yes, Preferred Circumcision Style:​

• Tightness Preference:
  • ☐ Loose (some residual foreskin remains)
  • ☐ Moderate (balanced look)
  • ☐ Tight (no excess skin)
• Scar Placement Preference:
  • ☐ Low (scar closer to the glans)
  • ☐ High (scar closer to the base)
• Frenulum Handling:
  • ☐ Leave frenulum intact
  • ☐ Partial frenulum removal
  • ☐ Full frenulum removal

Aren’t there enough cut men in the world for you to indulge your fetish in? Why do men with a cut fetish always prey on uncut men? I’m pretty sure at this point there are more cut men than there are uncut, based off all the pictures I’ve seen online, so just leave our uncut men alone and stop being greedy.

 

[NotAHeterosexual]

By using the phrase "natural" you'd be implying a sense of shame that those who are circumcised are unnatural or abnormal, which is not what we want to do.

It doesn’t need to be normalized anymore than it has. The only shaming I see is people demonizing intact penises, go to Africa or The Philippines and you will see their very strong foreskin hatred. You never see this type of obsession with women’s genitals needing to be or look a certain way, it’s only men that are shamed if their genitals don’t fit the standard society has for them.

 

[NotAHeterosexual]

By using the phrase "natural" you'd be implying a sense of shame that those who are circumcised are unnatural or abnormal, which is not what we want to do.

The foreskin and all penis sizes need to be normalized. All you ever see is the normalization of large penises or circumcised penises and that’s it. Society has moved past its obsession with women’s bodies needing to look a certain way, but still judges men’s natural bodies. Every time women talk about undergoing labiaplasty, feminists run to condemn it because it normalizes having modified genitals.

 

[NotAHeterosexual]

“Unnatural” is a possible, but not the only antonym, and in itself has multiple meanings (one of which is accurate, and not synonymous with ‘abnormal’).
In this context, the antonym of natural is ‘modified’ or ‘altered’, which is a correct description of a penis following prepucectomy.

I’ve always hated the terms “uncircumcised” or “uncut” because it implies that penises that did not have its prepuce sliced off is abnormal or incomplete. It normalizes circumcision and makes circumcision the standard and being intact “odd.”

 

[freeballerlondon]

Aren’t there enough cut men in the world for you to indulge your fetish in? Why do men with a cut fetish always prey on uncut men? I’m pretty sure at this point there are more cut men than there are uncut, based off all the pictures I’ve seen online, so just leave our uncut men alone and stop being greedy.

Fortunately, that is not the case. The majority of all men is intact. However, you are right in mentioning acucullophilia - a paraphilia, not a fetish, because it causes irreversible change - which is quite common in this forum
The urge experienced by acucullophiles seems consistent with externalising their trauma, although it should be noted that there’s also the factor that one country where the practice is aggressively, almost religiously promoted, namely the USA, has a very strong tendency to reduce any issue into a false dichotomy (cf Bush’ “you are either for me, or against me” - a classic example of a false dichotomy)
This simplified, black-and-white worldview has permeated every fibre of their culture and media.

It doesn’t need to be normalized anymore than it has. The only shaming I see is people demonizing intact penises, go to Africa or The Philippines and you will see their very strong foreskin hatred. You never see this type of obsession with women’s genitals needing to be or look a certain way, it’s only men that are shamed if their genitals don’t fit the standard society has for them.

In this case, false arguments should be noted. There was a deeply flawed study from Africa that apparently showed that circumcision imparted some protection against HIV. Interestingly, 1) they didn’t allow the study to run its course (in science, that’s a mortal sin) and 2) the *actual* conclusion (I saw the data) wasn’t that circumcised men had a (slightly) lower chance of contracting HIV: it was that muslim men had etc.. (the reason being that muslims wash themselves immediately after sex). The study included Jews as well and they were quite explicit in ‘condemning’ them as well. In other words, the study wasn’t only flawed, but also religiously motivated.
They also forgot to mention that women who have sex with circumcised men, have a greater chance of contracting HIV due to the abrasions on the inside of the vagina.

I’ve always hated the terms “uncircumcised” or “uncut” because it implies that penises that did not have its prepuce sliced off is abnormal or incomplete. It normalizes circumcision and makes circumcision the standard and being intact “odd.”

The term is absurd, because as I said, instead of using the accurate term, you have this linguistic monstrosity similar to “unincomplete”. You are correct in your assumption that this has its root in an attempt to normalise unnecessarily operating on newborns, which (nowadays) means that these children not only have to undergo anaesthesia (until the mid 70s, USA doctors maintained that babies felt no pain, they were strapped to a plastic board without as much as an analgesic, and the babies would literally pass out from sheer pain), but also have to suffer the afterpain similar to having your nail pulled out.

Interestingly, proponents of the practice actively resist - cognitive dissonance - the fact that the rationale for the practice is entirely post-hoc, and has changed over its course. However, going back to the origins, the original ‘reason’ for the practice was mainly religion (most doctors were Jewish) and a strong desire to curb the sexuality of boys.