blandporn

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Posts
87
Media
0
Likes
75
Points
28
Location
São Paulo (Brazil)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Some are chubby, some are more skinny, some are older and some seems to be younger, but everyone have the same feature: they don't have ANY sexual attractiveness, they don't have neither face, nor name and even seem don't have a history of life. They are just a nut to fit on a screw.

It's impossible to anyone don't see the "Cruising/Sokuhame" series from <hunk-ch.com> as a fucking curious and strange thing. It's a very paradoxial porn gender, because for pick out men for scenes they think "Humm... let's choose the hunkiest and fittest boy that we can find", but in women case it seems that they think the opposite "Humm... let's choose the ugliest women in the entire Japan, preferably a sedentary who spends the day eating Mcdonald's and watching Netflix".

Said this, I keep asking myself: who are they? Is this a real work or just a leisure? How much do they earn with this dream work (usually girl pornstars gain more, but this case seems to be the opposite), the same as their boys partners? How are they selected? Is there a form on the site only for women subscribe or is a thing like a street ads saying "Do you want to have sex with a hot boy for free? Come for us!"?

And the most important question: Their work is really professional or not?



1730080980019.jpeg


1730081382509.jpeg
 

Attachments

Those scenes are for folks that want to watch straight sex that focuses primarily on the dude, the casting isn't preoccupied with getting some bombshell lady that will distract too much from the man.

This subgenre of porn exists in the west too, and I've noticed that they'll almost never cast women with huge tits and go more of an average look.
 
I see two reasons :

- Pretty women are expensive. The production costs of JGV straight scenes are traditionally very low : ideally, the male models are not even paid (because they will supposedly fuck anything) so I guess they don't want to spend much on the female models either.

- Hunk-ch directors want the women to basically be invisible so they do not distract from the male models : for this reason, they select women who are not too eye-catching and they even hide their faces.
They did have better female models before though... Imo, the women from the last 3-4 years are so unattractive it became distracting : unamused:
 
Those scenes are for folks that want to watch straight sex that focuses primarily on the dude, the casting isn't preoccupied with getting some bombshell lady that will distract too much from the man.

This subgenre of porn exists in the west too, and I've noticed that they'll almost never cast women with huge tits and go more of an average look.
If you talk about gay porn, it isn't true that "this exists in the west too". Even in other asian coutries the gay porn only (or almost only) presents the male-to-male format. These scenes of "straight sex with male focus" is typically from Japan, not Asia or East. The Japanese gay porn, except japanboyz.com, has a "straight mania": even in other sites like Coat.co.jp (that Wikipedia describes as a site for gay men), even if you see 10 or 20 videos with gay content, you usually will see at least one video with a woman involved. This is a thing that I will never understand: if some like watching straight porn, why don't create a site only for it? Why mixing straight and gay content in one single website? In the end, everything becomes a mess. This phenomenon can be seen in almost all Japanese porn sites.
 
I see two reasons :

- Pretty women are expensive. The production costs of JGV straight scenes are traditionally very low : ideally, the male models are not even paid (because they will supposedly fuck anything) so I guess they don't want to spend much on the female models either.

- Hunk-ch directors want the women to basically be invisible so they do not distract from the male models : for this reason, they select women who are not too eye-catching and they even hide their faces.
They did have better female models before though... Imo, the women from the last 3-4 years are so unattractive it became distracting : unamused:
Best explanation
 
  • Like
Reactions: blandporn
Don't know the details but I don't think any woman would have sex on camera for no pay. There's no reason for them to since they can find any hot guy on the street or online to fuck. They're most likely paid but probably not as much as the men. A similar dynamic is found in straight porn (for straight guys) where the guys are...not very good looking and their eyes are mosaiced. This is to put most or all of the focus on the women.
 
Don't know the details but I don't think any woman would have sex on camera for no pay. There's no reason for them to since they can find any hot guy on the street or online to fuck. They're most likely paid but probably not as much as the men. A similar dynamic is found in straight porn (for straight guys) where the guys are...not very good looking and their eyes are mosaiced. This is to put most or all of the focus on the women.
Usually straight men prefer hotter and younger girls to fuck. This is not the case, because these women aren't attractive as the men like. In real life it would be difficult for them have free sex with the hottest men. So it isn't a question of being women or men. It's about being attractive or not. Unattractive people usually don't have sex with attractive people, except if they have money, of course.
 
Some are chubby, some are more skinny, some are older and some seems to be younger, but everyone have the same feature: they don't have ANY sexual attractiveness, they don't have neither face, nor name and even seem don't have a history of life. They are just a nut to fit on a screw.

It's impossible to anyone don't see the "Cruising/Sokuhame" series from <hunk-ch.com> as a fucking curious and strange thing. It's a very paradoxial porn gender, because for pick out men for scenes they think "Humm... let's choose the hunkiest and fittest boy that we can find", but in women case it seems that they think the opposite "Humm... let's choose the ugliest women in the entire Japan, preferably a sedentary who spends the day eating Mcdonald's and watching Netflix".

Said this, I keep asking myself: who are they? Is this a real work or just a leisure? How much do they earn with this dream work (usually girl pornstars gain more, but this case seems to be the opposite), the same as their boys partners? How are they selected? Is there a form on the site only for women subscribe or is a thing like a street ads saying "Do you want to have sex with a hot boy for free? Come for us!"?

And the most important question: Their work is really professional or not?



View attachment 148852441

View attachment 148852911
ughh i can’t help but hate them 😭 they’re so lucky to be able to have sex with such hot japanese guys </3
 
ughh i can’t help but hate them 😭 they’re so lucky to be able to have sex with such hot japanese guys </3
Better if they put these guys to have sex with other hot guys. Why keep doing straight porn if the women are ugly and don't show the face? Or more better, if the public is gay, they should give a chance to gay male subscribers have sex with the pornstars!
 
In a normal straight porn, men have the work of keep their penises erect, but women have the work of being attractive and hotness. In a gay porn is similar, because both men usually are visible and have the work of being hot and being attractive for the public (the top as a top and the bottom as a bottom) and share the same genital. But in Hunk-ch straight porn there is the worst of porn: these women who "work" for them practically don't work on anything, don't have to be erect like men and don't have to be attractive like women. They just have the hard and sweaty work of being satisfied by the hottest man that they give them for one day, even don't deserving it. A bitch has his pussy skinned by the all men of the world, his family can abandon her, but, at least, it's a hot girl, the men like them and even can be famous. The hunk-ch women are in a level below of the word "bitch". They're a perfect example of vagabondage and being in a level below of bitch, paying them would be a mere formality and also a outrage to the other real workers in the entire world, like being paid to eat at an expensive restaurant by the owner.
 
I agree it really distacts and detracts. the more natural and not pixelated or masked the better

In seehimfuck they use beautiful women that enhance the men..
I find straight porn boring no matter what the guy looks like.

I guess I’ve programmed myself to not be attracted to straight men so once I see a guy react sexually to a women, I completely lose interest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blandporn