Why is studio gay porn so masturbation obsessed, even in fucking scenes???

Capitolhillguy

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Posts
4,793
Media
11
Likes
15,124
Points
518
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I don't see a porn forum to post this but why in studio porn do you almost always have people who fuck end by pulling out and jacking themselves off? Is it because bottoms are so inept??? Even in oral sex, which admittedly the vast majority of porn stars know nothing about, always ends in tops having to jack themselves off. Am I the only person who would like bottoms to get their tops off? it just almost never happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnsmith.you
Well, it used to be called the “money shot” back in my day. Seeing a guy cum was considered the “capper” to a porn performance. Some things don’t change. I agree it’s rather ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capitolhillguy
You are definitely correct: but I say- at the expense of never seeing anyone cum in porn except by jacking themselves off?????? It is kind of depressing, is it not, as that is the only way I can get myself off these days. I want in my fantasy scenes to see people so into each other they get their partner's off. I watch 3 ways where I am astounded that no one tries to suck a load out of a bottom getting fucked. Of course the issue with that is that virtually everyone in porn just uses their lips for head and that doesn't have enough friction to ever make someone cum. I think that would be so sexy to see a bottom feed someone when getting bred, but you never ever see that. So many hot options in porn must be sacrificed so that guys can jack off like they do in solo videos.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because many of us, even the 100% Straight guys, like to see a big , delicious cocks getting stimulated by hand. . . . . . . . . . . . .
For me, it's the long, boring fuck scenes that should be cut.
 
From what I understand from friends of mine still doing porn, the cumshot is still a hugely important part of the scene, even in scenes where they're just showing a bit of cum while the rest goes inside. And I think in the majority of porn shoots, even amateur ones, the easiest way to make sure the camera gets a good shot of the cum is to have the guy jerk himself off to climax so that the cameraman/men has enough warning to get the shot. I also think that the higher prevalence post-lockdowns of guys into gooning and bating along to videos of guys bating might also have something to do with it, but I think it's probably more the production side of things.

I don't personally love it because I prefer the load either be a full breeding or directly into the mouth/throat, but I guess people like us are still minority enough in porn watching for it to not move the needle.
 
Some of the smaller studios have made videos with only internal cumshots, such as the Pulling Out is for Porn series. But these often tend to be small producers, often with less than professional level models.

But by and large, you are correct that porn, gay and straight, almost always ends with a big cock being jerked to completion. I think the producers have several reasons for staging this so-called money shot. For many guys, cumming is the most exciting and gratifying part of sex, particularly if they are watching porn instead of fucking for themselves. So, they want to show the load in all its glory...how much, how hard and far it is shot, how big a mess it makes, etc. Also, the viewer is probably stroking his own cock while watching, so he can relate to stroking a load out, and hopefully blows his own at the conclusion of the scene, since cumming is often contagious.

Some reasons also have to do with how studio porn is sometimes shot, which is not just recording natural sex. I remember the last porn shoot I did (I'm an old man now...), which was shot in a completely non-linear sequence, with about 2 hours of raw video needed to make the 35 minute final scene. After fucking for over an hour in the various requested positions (without cumming), we had to recreate many of the positions again so better still shots could be taken, without interfering with the primary video recording. Only then was I told I should cum, but the build-up to the magic moment was long gone. So we fucked a little, pulled out, and I stroked out the load. That actually took a lot longer stroking than it should have, but thanks to editing no one sees the delay. It wasn't that the bottom was bad, it's just that after being told to hold off cumming for a long time, it can be difficult to do so when they finally need the load.
 
My personal theory is that whatever medications (viagra/cialis/lidocaine etc etc) they use to stay hard and last as long as is needed for a porn shoot makes them need a ton of stimulation to climax. The kind that needs furious jacking off so the end of the scene
 
I don’t get this either. Sure you need the money shot, but then why not have the bottom jerk or suck you off to completion? It’s especially annoying when they’re fucking and then it cuts to the top jerking off. At least fuck the bottom till you’re about to bust and then cum on his face. All this jerking off makes it seem like they aren’t really enjoying themselves
 
Some of the smaller studios have made videos with only internal cumshots, such as the Pulling Out is for Porn series. But these often tend to be small producers, often with less than professional level models.

But by and large, you are correct that porn, gay and straight, almost always ends with a big cock being jerked to completion. I think the producers have several reasons for staging this so-called money shot. For many guys, cumming is the most exciting and gratifying part of sex, particularly if they are watching porn instead of fucking for themselves. So, they want to show the load in all its glory...how much, how hard and far it is shot, how big a mess it makes, etc. Also, the viewer is probably stroking his own cock while watching, so he can relate to stroking a load out, and hopefully blows his own at the conclusion of the scene, since cumming is often contagious.

Some reasons also have to do with how studio porn is sometimes shot, which is not just recording natural sex. I remember the last porn shoot I did (I'm an old man now...), which was shot in a completely non-linear sequence, with about 2 hours of raw video needed to make the 35 minute final scene. After fucking for over an hour in the various requested positions (without cumming), we had to recreate many of the positions again so better still shots could be taken, without interfering with the primary video recording. Only then was I told I should cum, but the build-up to the magic moment was long gone. So we fucked a little, pulled out, and I stroked out the load. That actually took a lot longer stroking than it should have, but thanks to editing no one sees the delay. It wasn't that the bottom was bad, it's just that after being told to hold off cumming for a long time, it can be difficult to do so when they finally need the load.
Yes BUT Onlyfans stuff is hugely popular these days and there is a lot of breeding in Onlyfans ( alas, most with totally passive bottoms that don't cum). Still, folks are buying this stuff in droves. Why don't the studios get a clue.
 
My personal theory is that whatever medications (viagra/cialis/lidocaine etc etc) they use to stay hard and last as long as is needed for a porn shoot makes them need a ton of stimulation to climax. The kind that needs furious jacking off so the end of the scene
This is my theory too. Some of these scenes have the guy death gripping themselves like they’re seriously struggling to cum at the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gentlesniper