Andres camilo

is it just me that sees like a whole lot of sadness in his face? the smile looks fake and the eyes don't reflect the smile, he has sad eyes. i'm guessing he's trying to put on a brave face despite all the shit that went down
He’s got those crying eyes for sure. Tough for him. And unlike Max, Andreas always seemed more genuine.
 
Why does Max get the dog? That sucks.

I do really feel for Andres. Max appears to be running as far away as possible, taking the dog and leaving it remarkably hard to co-parent the dog Andres seemed to love. Presumably they’ve come to that agreement but it’s just another part of his life he’s lost. I really hope in a good few months, once he’s processed all the loss, he can find genuine happiness.
 
Why does Max get the dog? That sucks.

I do really feel for Andres. Max appears to be running as far away as possible, taking the dog and leaving it remarkably hard to co-parent the dog Andres seemed to love. Presumably they’ve come to that agreement but it’s just another part of his life he’s lost. I really hope in a good few months, once he’s processed all the loss, he can find genuine happiness.
andres didn't stick around either, he went to colombia, so even if max had stayed in the u.s., andres would be far away as well. maybe andres didn't wanna coparent the dog
 
they said they shared custody of Sarge but it might be a couple months with one and a couple months with the other, we don't know their arrangement which is likely to change as they settle down in their new lives in different homes/countries
 
  • Haha
Reactions: offlx
idk I don’t think he would have just left the country unless he didn’t have anything left keeping him here. I think him leaving came after Max took Sarge, not before. (Not “Take Sarge because I’m going to Columbia”, but “I’m going to Columbia because you took Sarge and I have no house or man anymore.”)

Makes me think this wasn’t quite as amicable as they’re trying to make it seem. Not so easy to compartmentalize that, as Andrés seems to be hinting at. Most of the time someone gets the short end of the stick and it does not appear to be Max, but he does have appearances he’s always had to keep since even before Andrés too, so who knows.
 
idk I don’t think he would have just left the country unless he didn’t have anything left keeping him here. I think him leaving came after Max took Sarge, not before. (Not “Take Sarge because I’m going to Columbia”, but “I’m going to Columbia because you took Sarge and I have no house or man anymore.”)

Makes me think this wasn’t quite as amicable as they’re trying to make it seem. Not so easy to compartmentalize that, as Andrés seems to be hinting at. Most of the time someone gets the short end of the stick and it does not appear to be Max, but he does have appearances he’s always had to keep since even before Andrés too, so who knows.
exactly, it makes you think... this is conjecture, you don't know anything and they said they were sharing custody of Sarge. Why do people have this strange need to share their thought of what is really happening to people don't have never met and not believe what these people have actually said?
 
I really hope he finds peace. As a veteran, I've always loved Andres' given his service and appreciated seeing him out and authentic. I had no idea he was having problems with his relationship or feeling isolated. I had always assumed he was just as popular as all the other WeHo influencers. :worried:
 
andres didn't stick around either, he went to colombia, so even if max had stayed in the u.s., andres would be far away as well. maybe andres didn't wanna coparent the dog
Might as well stay in Colombia for a while. His home burned to the ground, along with all of his possessions. Assuming that they had insurance, they might get a settlement but starting over is expensive, especially when you have no job that produces steady income.

They need to get Sarge his own Instagram/Patreon revenue stream for all the flights back and forth.
Sarge is OnlyFans material. He would have no problem showing hole.
 
exactly, it makes you think... this is conjecture, you don't know anything and they said they were sharing custody of Sarge. Why do people have this strange need to share their thought of what is really happening to people don't have never met and not believe what these people have actually said?
I’m sorry, I must’ve missed this. I’m more into my own life than those of people I don’t even know, but go on.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bigboaster
Might as well stay in Colombia for a while. His home burned to the ground, along with all of his possessions. Assuming that they had insurance, they might get a settlement but starting over is expensive, especially when you have no job that produces steady income
It was rented, so it wasn't as big of a loss. He definitely lost a lot of material possessions that might have been meaningful, but he could've gone and rented some other place in the city
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3vil3y3
It was rented, so it wasn't as big of a loss. He definitely lost a lot of material possessions that might have been meaningful, but he could've gone and rented some other place in the city
This is where people who haven't been through a fire or a flood don't get it. Buildings can be replaced. Photos, computers, personal mementos, family heirlooms and other personal items are not replaceable. Losing everything in a disaster is one of the worst things that can happen to anyone.

If you knew anyone in Los Angeles, you would also know that there is a shortage of rental properties in the area. Ten thousand buildings burned in the fires and those people can't just find "some other place in the city". Hotels are full. People are living in friend's living rooms or garages. Since the fires, rental prices have shot up 20%.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/di...s-anxiously-search-somewhere-live-2025-01-18/
 
they got a great rental price on that house considering the neighborhood, maybe because they agreed to fix it up a little in exchange for a discount. if you split that house rental payment by half for each of them they would end up with an older one bedroom apartment in an ok area. probably a really shitty prospect from what they had.

they/andres (he had the normal job to qualify for the mortgage at the time) might still own the condo they lived in before but i'm guessing they had a renter in there so couldn't go back to it. i'd bet that the rent on that doesn't pay for the mortgage all the way - it usually doesn't in LA. you only make a profit off a rental if you've owned the place for a while typically as mortgage payments are relatively high compared to rents. this is why they rented instead of bought the house in the palisades because their mortgage payment if they had bought it would have been double what the rent cost was
 
This is where people who haven't been through a fire or a flood don't get it. Buildings can be replaced. Photos, computers, personal mementos, family heirlooms and other personal items are not replaceable. Losing everything in a disaster is one of the worst things that can happen to anyone.

If you knew anyone in Los Angeles, you would also know that there is a shortage of rental properties in the area. Ten thousand buildings burned in the fires and those people can't just find "some other place in the city". Hotels are full. People are living in friend's living rooms or garages. Since the fires, rental prices have shot up 20%.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/di...s-anxiously-search-somewhere-live-2025-01-18/
They're influencers, they're well off enough to have picked anywhere else to move to, which technically they did. It's not something 99% of those affected by the fires can do. They didn't even need to go find a new place to rent in l.a. they could've gone elsewhere. And they did, to another country even