Archangel Cole Klink

I have a collection
do you still have the collection... send it to me:heart_eyes:!!! legally speaking it is not possible to actually state that those videos are from when he was underage. Moreover, They leaked once he was 18 and for what everyone knows the famous video could have been taken the exact day he got 18. P.hub has a full list of videos of: "Just 18" which actually portray 25 years old pornstars guys that want to gain money on the twink business xD If he had a collection or a dirty business for money on Snapchat, he before everyone should right now and even before he was 18, legally be persecuted for underage pornography, prostitution and other stuff...
So everyone panicking here before sharing disinformation please legally inform :joy:
How could you prove he was underage on a video posted once he got 18 ...Was there a calendar with the exact day behind(even if it could just be on the wrong page or not updated )? was he wearing just 17 t-shirts? (who cares! also, my grandma could wear it or say she is 17 but she is not) It is simply ridiculous and just his word is not evidence enough ... just think about it ... it is like someone kills someone else and then he is declared innocent just because he states he was not guilty of the crime:joy:. Simply ridiculous. Does he look underage on the video?... that is also not evidence enough either, just think about the p.hub example or Thomas Brodie-Sangster(actor).
For what we know, and what can actually be stated is that he felt guilty that someone shared his video online and said he was underage. He signalled the videos on tweeter and it removed it as it was signalled here... and THAT is it! (if someone has another logical reason on how that collection of videos should not be posted please comment below with a clear argument ^^)
That is why we should all be careful about who we show our willies and especially not to have a collection of it on the internet :joy:

So, can you share the video or the collection of videos?:heart_eyes::heart_eyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex_21
do you still have the collection... send it to me:heart_eyes:!!! legally speaking it is not possible to actually state that those videos are from when he was underage. Moreover, They leaked once he was 18 and for what everyone knows the famous video could have been taken the exact day he got 18. P.hub has a full list of videos of: "Just 18" which actually portray 25 years old pornstars guys that want to gain money on the twink business xD If he had a collection or a dirty business for money on Snapchat, he before everyone should right now and even before he was 18, legally be persecuted for underage pornography, prostitution and other stuff...
So everyone panicking here before sharing disinformation please legally inform :joy:
How could you prove he was underage on a video posted once he got 18 ...Was there a calendar with the exact day behind(even if it could just be on the wrong page or not updated )? was he wearing just 17 t-shirts? (who cares! also, my grandma could wear it or say she is 17 but she is not) It is simply ridiculous and just his word is not evidence enough ... just think about it ... it is like someone kills someone else and then he is declared innocent just because he states he was not guilty of the crime:joy:. Simply ridiculous. Does he look underage on the video?... that is also not evidence enough either, just think about the p.hub example or Thomas Brodie-Sangster(actor).
For what we know, and what can actually be stated is that he felt guilty that someone shared his video online and said he was underage. He signalled the videos on tweeter and it removed it as it was signalled here... and THAT is it! (if someone has another logical reason on how that collection of videos should not be posted please comment below with a clear argument ^^)
That is why we should all be careful about who we show our willies and especially not to have a collection of it on the internet :joy:

So, can you share the video or the collection of videos?:heart_eyes::heart_eyes:
I found that one and only video on Twitter. I never seen that collection. I think it’s bs tbh. There’s no such thing as a collection of his nudes
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex_21
373C3C62-EC54-4206-9C35-AB26A03FB180.jpeg
do you still have the collection... send it to me:heart_eyes:!!! legally speaking it is not possible to actually state that those videos are from when he was underage. Moreover, They leaked once he was 18 and for what everyone knows the famous video could have been taken the exact day he got 18. P.hub has a full list of videos of: "Just 18" which actually portray 25 years old pornstars guys that want to gain money on the twink business xD If he had a collection or a dirty business for money on Snapchat, he before everyone should right now and even before he was 18, legally be persecuted for underage pornography, prostitution and other stuff...
So everyone panicking here before sharing disinformation please legally inform :joy:
How could you prove he was underage on a video posted once he got 18 ...Was there a calendar with the exact day behind(even if it could just be on the wrong page or not updated )? was he wearing just 17 t-shirts? (who cares! also, my grandma could wear it or say she is 17 but she is not) It is simply ridiculous and just his word is not evidence enough ... just think about it ... it is like someone kills someone else and then he is declared innocent just because he states he was not guilty of the crime:joy:. Simply ridiculous. Does he look underage on the video?... that is also not evidence enough either, just think about the p.hub example or Thomas Brodie-Sangster(actor).
For what we know, and what can actually be stated is that he felt guilty that someone shared his video online and said he was underage. He signalled the videos on tweeter and it removed it as it was signalled here... and THAT is it! (if someone has another logical reason on how that collection of videos should not be posted please comment below with a clear argument ^^)
That is why we should all be careful about who we show our willies and especially not to have a collection of it on the internet :joy:

So, can you share the video or the collection of videos?:heart_eyes::heart_eyes:
Just, wow. Here’s evidence from lpsg owner on whether it’s underage or not. If the video was release exactly on his 18th birthday, then it it highly unlikely it was recorded that exact same day. In fact, I remember it being leaked on Twitter BEFORE his 18th birthday and creation of this thread.
 
View attachment 34318851
Just, wow. Here’s evidence from lpsg owner on whether it’s underage or not. If the video was release exactly on his 18th birthday, then it it highly unlikely it was recorded that exact same day. In fact, I remember it being leaked on Twitter BEFORE his 18th birthday and creation of this thread.
Okay what now?
 
View attachment 34318851
Just, wow. Here’s evidence from lpsg owner on whether it’s underage or not. If the video was released exactly on his 18th birthday, then it it highly unlikely it was recorded that exact same day. In fact, I remember it being leaked on Twitter BEFORE his 18th birthday and creation of this thread.

Ehm... he/she (the lpsg owner) is clearly saying: he only recently turned 18 so any content is PROBABLY not legal.
probably ... what does probably mean? well, for sure note certainly or absolutely. Furthermore, "he only recently turned 18" seems to refer that it was not even the same day, but few days after he turned 18 that the content was asked to be removed. So, actually, the lpsg owner is if anything sustaining with her/his own words my statement ^^

your words are also in the favour of my thesis: "the highly unlikely" means nothing, you don't even know how many things can happen in a day, especially on someone 18s birthday (here in Europe, loooots of teens go to Amsterdam or Prague to celebrate... and I am sure you can imagine why Amsterdam or Prague ahahah)