MessiahKhiao
Legendary Member
First time he got hurt was because he was trying to lift a lot of weight for likes and comments and it backfired. I don't know details on the second injury.
ricoike
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2017
- Posts
- 831
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 325
- Points
- 98
- Location
- Oregon (Ohio, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I just remember a video of him on a mountain, and then the video stopped, I do not know if he fell ill
He was rappelling and lost his footing before the descent, snapped his knee I guess. Then retore his bicep abs they found a blood clot in his leg.
Anybody going to watch the homoerotic move whee he acts?
It will be funny to see how they will try to tone down the inherent homoeroticism of bodybuilding in the film...
It will be funny to see how they will try to tone down the inherent homoeroticism of bodybuilding in the film...
Anybody going to watch the homoerotic move whee he acts?
It will be funny to see how they will try to tone down the inherent homoeroticism of bodybuilding in the film...
What’s the title of the film?
Weider, isn't it.
A homophobic man (I hve read) who built an empire by exploitig sexy muscles of men
I've read that Weider was homophobic, too, which in his time was considered "necessary" when dealing with men who were sexualized.
The bigger question to ask now, in 2018, is why whenever the male form is or was presented in a sexual way, is it "gay". That concept in and of itself is misogynistic in the sense that it means that women are incapable of having sexual desires. And it also shoots down any man, gay or straight, who might see himself as a sexual being. What is left in the end is the notion that all pictures, photos, etc. are created for the viewing of the straight man, irrespective of the fact that the majority of people are female or that the person being photographed is a real individual, too.
The bigger question to ask now, in 2018, is why whenever the male form is or was presented in a sexual way, is it "gay". That concept in and of itself is misogynistic in the sense that it means that women are incapable of having sexual desires. And it also shoots down any man, gay or straight, who might see himself as a sexual being. What is left in the end is the notion that all pictures, photos, etc. are created for the viewing of the straight man, irrespective of the fact that the majority of people are female or that the person being photographed is a real individual, too.
This is the thing.
The roots of bodybuilding are found in the Greek body ideal and it came into existence during a period of Greek history where homoeroticism was celebrated which allowed men to exalt the male body not only as the epítome of health but also as the epitome of sexual attractiveness.
As a writer says in a book, it was homosexual and bisexual men of the time that set the pattern (Greek body ideal) of what was the ultimate expression of physical male beauty. Modern bodybuilding took this conxept and commercilized it for the masses and homosexuality was always in the picture which shows, to no one's surprise, that homosexual men have always had a stronger preference for or attracion to muscular physiques.
Bodybuilding is about exacerbating secondry sex traits and secondary sex traits are there to evoke sex desires so obviously, an activity like bodybuilding is full of sexually-charged connotations.
The roots of bodybuilding are found in the Greek body ideal and it came into existence during a period of Greek history where homoeroticism was celebrated which allowed men to exalt the male body not only as the epítome of health but also as the epitome of sexual attractiveness.
As a writer says in a book, it was homosexual and bisexual men of the time that set the pattern (Greek body ideal) of what was the ultimate expression of physical male beauty. Modern bodybuilding took this conxept and commercilized it for the masses and homosexuality was always in the picture which shows, to no one's surprise, that homosexual men have always had a stronger preference for or attracion to muscular physiques.
Bodybuilding is about exacerbating secondry sex traits and secondary sex traits are there to evoke sex desires so obviously, an activity like bodybuilding is full of sexually-charged connotations.
He literally fell off a cliff. Broke his leg and knee cap
I honestly don’t think he’s going to be in the film that long. The film will be mainly about Tyler Hoechlin. And the character that he plays. Which sold me as soon as I found out about it. Like Tyler in speedos? I’m in.Anybody going to watch the homoerotic move whee he acts?
It will be funny to see how they will try to tone down the inherent homoeroticism of bodybuilding in the film...
Well, you're a woman, in a way the film is suppose dto attract women. Bodybuiding films constantly try to make it look like there's nothing homoerotic about bodybuilding.
Me being a woman has nothing to do with anything. I support the LGBT community and I’m apart of it. But I’m only watching the movie because I’m a fan of Tyler. I know all about the trying to erase the homoerotic nature of bodybuilding. But I’m supporting my actor, nothing more, nothing less.
tnphm
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
- Posts
- 471
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,443
- Points
- 213
- Location
- Oakland (California, United States)
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
What the hell? How do I delete someone else’s post lmao. The mental gymnastics in this post is incredible.
You didn't understand my comment. I was talking about how the bodybuilding industry constantly acts like there is nothing homoerotic about bodybuilding and constantly ignores the gay fanbase which is strong and I think this movie will reflect that attitude.
I was complaining about bodybuilding as an industry when it comes to its very nature and homosexuality; not you.
Similar threads
