zkushner
Expert Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2022
- Posts
- 15
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 153
- Points
- 38
- Location
- London, UK
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
It was confirmed that it’s a prostheticSaw this on twitter just now… thoughts?
Filmmakers have been using prosthetic dicks since the '70s.It was confirmed that it’s a prosthetic
It's more like the studios don't want their actors to film completely nude with genitals out, cause not only can that be uncomfortable for both the actor and their co-star (would you want your colleagues vagina in your face), but it's also a thin line legally. It could go wrong very quickly very easily.Men who use prosthetics are cowards. It’s basically saying “I’m insecure about showing my small pp”
Average Korean man is 5”6 and Charles is 6ftIt's more like the studios don't want their actors to film completely nude with genitals out, cause not only can that be uncomfortable for both the actor and their co-star (would you want your colleagues vagina in your face), but it's also a thin line legally. It could go wrong very quickly very easily.
That being said I think Charles does have a small pp lol. There are no good bulge pics of him and Koreans statically have some of the smallest dicks in the world.
Men who use prosthetics are cowards. It’s basically saying “I’m insecure about showing my small pp”
The prosthetic used in the film had nothing to do with the size of Charles Melton's penis but was rather to disclose the motivation behind his character's rapist/pedophile/sociopathic wife, that being she was also a size queen.Average Korean man is 5”6 and Charles is 6ft
exactly! it gives us insight as to why she was drawn to him so it had to be big!The prosthetic used in the film had nothing to do with the size of Charles Melton's penis but was rather to disclose the motivation behind his character's rapist/pedophile/sociopathic wife, that being she was also a size queen.
that wasn't the primary reason but one of the reasonsDid I miss something in my one viewing of the movie? I don't remember thinking that this older woman was drawn to this younger man because of the size of his penis.
i must have missed it too. What makes you think she knew his size and that's what drew her to hm?that wasn't the primary reason but one of the reasons
she didn't but once they started fucking that's one of the reasons she clinged onto him. She was getting good di must have missed it too. What makes you think she knew his size and that's what drew her to hm?
According to Julianne Moore, her character justifies her actions by regressing back to a childlike mental state, (as seen in her letter and meltdowns over ridiculously insignificant events), insisting that Melton's character was the dominate figure and primarily responsible for the relationship. His size aided her creating the false misconception.i must have missed it too. What makes you think she knew his size and that's what drew her to hm?
That's interesting I hasn't heard that. But did she mean his size as far as height?According to Julianne Moore, her character justifies her actions by regressing back to a childlike mental state, (as seen in her letter and meltdowns over ridiculously insignificant events), insisting that Melton's character was the dominate figure and primarily responsible for the relationship. His size aided her creating the false misconception.
Neither. Moore doesn't discuss his size, but rather the director reveals the conceit by having Melton wear the prosthetic.That's interesting I hasn't heard that. But did she mean his size as far as height?