Pierre Johnson
Superior Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Posts
- 5,135
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 6,037
- Points
- 158
- Location
- London (Greater London, England)
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Well I liked Jamie as Sheriff Graham Humbert/The Huntsman on the tv series Once Upon a Time.jamie dornan isn't a good actor, he just managed to get a popular role on fifty shades
Maybe the first steps is to take roles in daytime soaps and prime time television series?.He’s too good looking to be taken seriously as a character actor. I think when models become too exposed or too successful in modeling, they get typecast by casting agencies and also he’s too old to get A list roles by the time he starts.
If he gets a good agent and mingles with the correct people, he might make it in art movies or a foreign one.
My opinion.
Maybe the first steps is to take roles in daytime soaps and prime time television series?.
Not to derail this thread too much, but Channing became a model after he was a stripper.tatum wasn't a model before, he was a stripper.
Same, and loved him in Sofia Coppola’s ‘Marie Antoinette’.Well I liked Jamie as Sheriff Graham Humbert/The Huntsman on the tv series Once Upon a Time.
Channing did model after his stint as a stripper. He was signed with a big agency in NYC and walked for big shows. It’s just that he lucked out more with acting.tatum wasn't a model before, he was a stripper.
Looks like Christian went through a phase with the hair dye during his youth.
![]()
![]()
Channing did model after his stint as a stripper. He was signed with a big agency in NYC and walked for big shows. It’s just that he lucked out more with acting.
Hollyweird: How Channing Tatum Went From Stripper to Fashion Model
I also agree. He was handsome in his teens - certainly better looking than most of the guys who attended my high school, haha - but he has improved with age, and now he really stands out.
I like his nose. Whenever I look at a photo of his face, I notice his eyes, his nose, and his lips - in that order, haha.
Being gay and being sexually aggressive aren’t synonymous. I don’t think he needs to cater to the sexually aggressive here or on IG or in the workplace. It’s one thing to compliment a pic but you guys know full well a lot of the comments are disgusting. I don’t even allow comments under my pics for that reason. Some people just go way too far.I think his first step is to widen his fan base by not blocking his gay followers for thirsty comments (like me). He will be working with a lot of gays in the filming industry. That. Is. His. First. Step......
Lol.
being gay and
Being gay and being sexually aggressive aren’t synonymous. I don’t think he needs to cater to the sexually aggressive here or on IG or in the workplace. It’s one thing to compliment a pic but you guys know full well a lot of the comments are disgusting. I don’t even allow comments under my pics for that reason. Some people just go way too far.
You may not find that sexually aggressive. He may. And yes...it may be because it came from a man. If a chick kept leaving comments that made me uncomfortable I’d block her too. To him the lip licking emoji from you was a too much. Can your ego handle that? LolIf you're not keen to scroll back to read why I was blocked. I posted a lip licking emoji and i had never ever commented on his IG before. I was a silent follower of his for about a year.
But if he has an open profile. Public. He will have all types of people checking on him. Men, women, straight, gay, trans. So it’s mandatory to accept all comments unless if someone is hating and bashing him. An emoji def isn’t that. So he’s on the wrong here.You may not find that sexually aggressive. He may. And yes...it may be because it came from a man. If a chick kept leaving comments that made me uncomfortable I’d block her too. To him the lip licking emoji from you was a too much. Can your ego handle that? Lol
You may not find that sexually aggressive. He may. And yes...it may be because it came from a man. If a chick kept leaving comments that made me uncomfortable I’d block her too. To him the lip licking emoji from you was a too much. Can your ego handle that? Lol
Each person gets to determine their own level of comfort. To you an emoji isn’t aggressive. To him and to me...they can be (depending on the emoji). My point is...we can’t force our level of comfort on another person. I see no issue with him blocking a person or comment. It’d be different convo if he responded directly to that person in a homophobic way.But if he has an open profile. Public. He will have all types of people checking on him. Men, women, straight, gay, trans. So it’s mandatory to accept all comments unless if someone is hating and bashing him. An emoji def isn’t that. So he’s on the wrong here.
I posted a pic in running tights post race nothing sexual about it. A commenter posted a litany of eggplant emojis. That was sexually aggressive. An emoji can in fact be sexually aggressive.It's not black and white tbh. An emoji isn't aggressive period. Hogue obviously has some insecure and or homophobic hangups if he feels the need to remove any attention from male commenters. Doesn't make him evil, it's common for meat head str8 guys like him so whatever.
Do I think he needs to cater to gays no. But I don't think it's particularly smart to create that persona. But it's his life and his page. He cna do what he wants.
An emoji can fan be sexually suggestive sure... . Aggressive? Idk about that. Maybe spammed then yeah I might agree. But a single emoji... That is stretching it. Again if a woman did it and he is fine with it But he removes it from a man.. . That is just clear bias. (And has nothing to do with the "aggressive" nature of the comment/emoji at all)I posted a pic in running tights post race nothing sexual about it. A commenter posted a litany of eggplant emojis. That was sexually aggressive. An emoji can in fact be sexually aggressive.
Depending on a persons experiences your “suggestive” could be another’s man “aggressive”. Won’t be the same for everyone. Guess that’s my main point...barring him being outright homophobic...his comfort level is his comfort level for those sorts of comments from men. and he’s entitled to establish that benchmark for himself. We all are.An emoji can fan be sexually suggestive sure... . Aggressive? Idk about that. Maybe spammed then yeah I might agree. But a single emoji... That is stretching it. Again if a woman did it and he is fine with it But he removes it from a man.. . That is just clear bias. (And has nothing to do with the "aggressive" nature of the comment/emoji at all)
Again he is fine to do whatever he wants. If he only wants female suggestive comments. He is fine to only accept that. I don't hate him for it and I don't think it makes a straight up homophobe. But it does ring of some of kind of weird slight homophobia or insecurity with male attention. That's all I'm saying.
If he doesn’t want men leaving thirsty comments on his page, maybe he should have the balls to say he doesn’t like it. But no, He’s probably afraid he’ll lose followers if he did that.Depending on a persons experiences your “suggestive” could be another’s man “aggressive”. Won’t be the same for everyone. Guess that’s my main point...barring him being outright homophobic...his comfort level is his comfort level for those sorts of comments from men. and he’s entitled to establish that benchmark for himself. We all are.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.