Cody christian

If you're annoyed because someone said a guy has a small dick, you need to grow up and act your age.
You realize that average is only 5.5”, right? So calling him small is just factually incorrect.

I’m fine with people having different opinions, but opinions are up for criticism, especially when they don’t fit the facts.
 
You realize that average is only 5.5”, right? So calling him small is just factually incorrect.

I’m fine with people having different opinions, but opinions are up for criticism, especially when they don’t fit the facts.

Don't use "factually" when you're expressing an opinion. Science has no definition of what is small, big or enormous, etc. It's a matter of perspective and opinion. Him having an "average" cock is irrelevant if someone perceives that average to be small.

This isn't a hard concept to grasp and at some point in your life, you'll need to get over the fact that some people are going to disagree with you on things.
 
Don't use "factually" when you're expressing an opinion. Science has no definition of what is small, big or enormous, etc. It's a matter of perspective and opinion. Him having an "average" cock is irrelevant if someone perceives that average to be small.

This isn't a hard concept to grasp and at some point in your life, you'll need to get over the fact that some people are going to disagree with you on things.
I’m not expressing an opinion when I’m basing what I say on scientific studies. The FACT is that 5.5” is average.

Someone could have a 6.5” cock and you might call that small, but you would be wrong because scientific studies don’t support your opinion.
 
I’m not expressing an opinion when I’m basing what I say on scientific studies. The FACT is that 5.5” is average.

Someone could have a 6.5” cock and you might call that small, but you would be wrong because scientific studies don’t support your opinion.

Science doesn't have a definition of what is big and small. Something being average is irrelevant to it being big or small. Big and small is relative to what a person perceives. Is the smallest planet small? Is the smallest whale small?

Again, not a hard concept to grasp so I'm not sure why you're struggling.
 
Science doesn't have a definition of what is big and small. Something being average is irrelevant to it being big or small. Big and small is relative to what a person perceives. Is the smallest planet small? Is the smallest whale small?

Again, not a hard concept to grasp so I'm not sure why you're struggling.
I guess I’ll say Shaq is small then. Because that doesn’t make me sound crazy.

Not sure why you’re so insistent that Cody has a small cock. It’s not like he has a micropenis. Now that would be small.

But I guess a micropenis could be considered large, and a 9.5” cock could be considered small.
 
Science doesn't have a definition of what is big and small. Something being average is irrelevant to it being big or small. Big and small is relative to what a person perceives. Is the smallest planet small? Is the smallest whale small?

Again, not a hard concept to grasp so I'm not sure why you're struggling.
My point is basically
Science doesn't have a definition of what is big and small. Something being average is irrelevant to it being big or small. Big and small is relative to what a person perceives. Is the smallest planet small? Is the smallest whale small?

Again, not a hard concept to grasp so I'm not sure why you're struggling.
My point is there are standards by which we measure everything.

Shaq is a large man according to the standards for height and weight of adult male humans.

Whitney Houston was an incredibly talented singer by the standards we judge singing. Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton are not talented singers by the standards we judge singing.

The smallest planet is small compared to other planets, but it is gigantic compared to the size of a house. However, we do not judge the size of planets and the size of houses by the same standards.

Likewise, the smallest whale is small compared to other whales, but it is gigantic compared to the size of a rabbit. However, we do not judge the size of whales and the size of rabbits by the same standards.

Thus, Cody’s cock might be small to YOU, by YOUR standards, and it’s definitely small in comparison to an elephant trunk, but by the scientifically accepted standards for human penis size, it is not small.

Is this still a difficult concept for YOU to grasp?
 
You clearly don't like losing an argument. Accept the L and stop spamming my inbox.

Thanks.
Also, I never started this argument. You were having this argument with other people and I jumped in because you were denying you’re a size queen when you clearly are one.
 
Can you get the hell out of this thread?
I wasn’t the one who started the argument about the size of his dick. He and some other people were already arguing about it, so take it up with them for starting the argument.

Besides, you’re one to speak considering I had to call you out on another thread for trolling it.