Science doesn't have a definition of what is big and small. Something being average is irrelevant to it being big or small. Big and small is relative to what a person perceives. Is the smallest planet small? Is the smallest whale small?
Again, not a hard concept to grasp so I'm not sure why you're struggling.
My point is basically
Science doesn't have a definition of what is big and small. Something being average is irrelevant to it being big or small. Big and small is relative to what a person perceives. Is the smallest planet small? Is the smallest whale small?
Again, not a hard concept to grasp so I'm not sure why you're struggling.
My point is there are standards by which we measure everything.
Shaq is a large man according to the standards for height and weight of adult male humans.
Whitney Houston was an incredibly talented singer by the standards we judge singing. Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton are not talented singers by the standards we judge singing.
The smallest planet is small compared to other planets, but it is gigantic compared to the size of a house. However, we do not judge the size of planets and the size of houses by the same standards.
Likewise, the smallest whale is small compared to other whales, but it is gigantic compared to the size of a rabbit. However, we do not judge the size of whales and the size of rabbits by the same standards.
Thus, Cody’s cock might be small to YOU, by YOUR standards, and it’s definitely small in comparison to an elephant trunk, but by the scientifically accepted standards for human penis size, it is not small.
Is this still a difficult concept for YOU to grasp?