criss strokes real measurement!! 6.5 INCHES!!!

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

From the girl's hand alone, one can easily tell that that dick is beyond 8 inches long. Granted, the average width of a woman's hand is smaller than a man's but clasped around a dick, it's really not that much smaller for this purpose. But generally speaking, you can only comfortably do a full 2-handed clasp of a cock if it's at least 8 inches long. I have a fuck buddy with an 8-incher who loves 2-handed opposing inward strokes while I suck on his head, drives him nuts! Lol. Grab a ruler and check it out for yourself. If she moved that hand all the way down to its base, there'd be enough space on his dick for a hand and a half (or 3 fingers at least) to cover its full length.

Still in denial? Or more lame "clapback" attempts? Lol.

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

Actually, because her hands are smaller, I think she could fit 3 of her hands fully but tightly. But for my hands, it'd probably be 2.5, which should make it right about 10 inches.

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

Ahh now I understand.
It seems dr. feeling good is an experienced professional expert scholar tutor skilled in the field of dick measuring just by seeing and guessing. No need to measure with a ruler anymore just submit a pic of your dick to add to his vast "collection" and he shall correctly guess your size with an added bonus of 2 extra inches

And I love your attempt at "proving" that I didn't measure those dicks myself by insinuating that I had people submit them to me. OMFG, Lmao!!! How pathetic can you actually be?! I never even thought that till your comment, because who the fuck does that but people like you who actually imagines it right away lol, because you have never even thought that what's routine to me could be possible for you?! It's actually pretty obvious that most of the pics were shot in the same bedroom with similar furniture and stuff. So unless I just found random people online with the same furnishings and the same exact old tape measure, you people are clearly the ones who are ironically DELUSIONAL and incapable of even basic observations and deductions, not to mention filled with malignant sexual envy that you just had to devote a thread just to deal with your insecurities and frustrations by finding similar people who can form a mini-religion that self-reinforces its beliefs and demonizes any opposition at all costs. As an atheist, this is actually what fascinated and challenged me when I encountered this thread in conjunction with my experience that directly refutes these fallacious beliefs.

 

[Snakebyte]

Lmao!!! Aaw...obviously did not understand whatsoever whatever has been written anywhere and now has the fucking nerve to even "think" it can lecture me when I already expounded on standards, arbitrariness, contigencies, considerations and so much more about the subject of measuring dick. Why don't you just try to read and fucking TRY TO UNDERSTAND everything that has been written first before you butt in and just further embarrass your useless self? Read on the anatomy of the male reproductive system before you start spouting on BASIQUE stuff you "think" you know so well but actually just demonstrated you know diddly squat about. Dude, you can't even tell the difference between 6.5 inches and a cock that is clearly closer to the end of a ruler than it is to its middle point from simple observation and comparative analysis/estimate of its dimensions relative to its surroundings alone!!! You're mentally deficient. Lmao!!! It's like the scaling that cartographers do to create maps but on a much more basic level. I even explained it in simple terms elsewhere. Oh nevermind! Again, it's not rocket science. You're just fucking upset about yours but whatever you believe, it's not gonna help you.

Ok, you're an asshole and perfect example of dunning-kruger. Understood. Grow up. And don't even bother. I put immature people like you on ignore anyway.

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

Ok, you're an idiot and asshole. Understood. Grow up. And don't even bother. I put immature idiots like you on ignore anyway.

Okay, thanks for confirming what I already knew. Of course, you're in the camp of Trump that believes anything you say out loud is "true" or will someday come true. And everything somebody else says that you couldn't accept, no matter how true and well-reasoned is "fake news." In the real world of the truth however, you kinda have to prove that the other argument is actually wrong and their proponent is repeatedly wrong for them to be a true "idiot." Otherwise, it's just empty whining. I just presented something that actually deals with the main topic of the thread for the Nth time just above your drivel, and made it very simple even for YOU to understand and impossible to refute logically. Your silence about it showed what you're ACTUALLY upset about. So I completely understand and expected your pain and predictable tantrum. Good riddance.

 

[Ocine]

It's an arbitrary "rule" that doesn't take into account the differences and uniqueness in our anatomies and so this makes it unscientific. Like I have said about Chris' own penis, it has a certain curvature that I have not seen in any other dick and the sheer size of it that's actually twice longer than the average one also makes the curvature more significant. Think about it, a curvature in a 4-inch penis is not gonna cover as much ground as one twice its length. Using a straight measuring device only measures the radius of the semicircle of the curved penis, which is significantly shorter than the actual length of it that does the actual PENETRATION in sex. The receiver doesn't feel 6.5 or 7 inches of the radius of Chris' dick (which is nonsensical) coming in but the full length of its flesh (not an imaginary line! Lol), which could be between 10 to 11 inches for him per comparison of ita visuals with my experience. That is what needs to be measured because THAT SENSATION is what really matters when we talk of penile length. There is actually not even any reason to measure it at all along with all the sexual competition and hierarchy the number connotes besides this singular literal significance. What will make the measurements scientific is to make them standard so you're not measuring one guy while he's standing up and using a ruler while you use a tape measure for another while he sits like Chris in the porn scene. That makes the whole comparison unfair and invalid. And that's unscientific

I actually found a lot of the comments here ridiculous and hilarious when they make such blanket statements that are rooted more on envy and ignorance than real knowledge. Like when they say "porn inches are not real inches." Lmao!!! How many of you have actually seen, touched, sucked and measured/estimated porn star dicks? I've actually had several and they include, like I said, other straight porn stars like Mark Ashley and Jack Lawrence whose cocks are very much within the ballpark stats of Chris'. As you can see from my examples, I know what 8.5 and 9 inch dicks look and feel like (actually up to 10 and 11 but I just didn't take those pics). So i have the unique perspective of estimating from their photos and videos and then being able to actually confirm my estimates in person. In reality, video has the tendency to give the illusion of making small objects appear larger and vice versa, so I was actually even nicely surprised/shocked at how their dicks were still larger than I expected, contrary to the common presumptions here. This wholesale generalization based on highly erroneous measurements is nothing but fallacious rationalization empowered by attempts to deal irrationally with inherent penis envy, which is part of human nature and unsurprising.

And ? we all need arbitary rules for understand what we are talking about

For exemple if eveyrone have his own technic for measure, then some will start from the belly button, some other from the asshole etc... and you cant compare.

When you measure a person heigh, you mesure in a STRAIGHT way from feet to head, if a woman have curvature lets say big boobs, then you will not use a tape and follow the curve of her boobs, otherwise she will heigh way higher than real. wich its stupid since you measured her boobs in the way, and not only the heigh

And just saying I have the same upward curve as criss strokes, but when measuring you can straight up your curve, also if you lose a bit of erection its not a big difference

 

[Ocine]

Actually, because her hands are smaller, I think she could fit 3 of her hands fully but tightly. But for my hands, it'd probably be 2.5, which should make it right about 10 inches.

There a difference between palm hand, and the fingers next to each other you can try with your own hands. Put only the fingers of your right hands on the palm of ur left hand, and you will see that the palm is larger than the fingers together

In your picture (very pixelised), we can only see her fingers not the palm hand.

Again there alot of pictures where criss stroke is measured and none are above 7.5 inch explain how ?
You can find them all over the net or in the measured pornstar thread.

 

[Leo0904]

Smallest 10 incher ever

 

[robbie9]

exactly, well done

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

There a difference between palm hand, and the fingers next to each other you can try with your own hands. Put only the fingers of your right hands on the palm of ur left hand, and you will see that the palm is larger than the fingers together

In your picture (very pixelised), we can only see her fingers not the palm hand.

Again there alot of pictures where criss stroke is measured and none are above 7.5 inch explain how ?
You can find them all over the net or in the measured pornstar thread.

First of all, thank you for posting responses that at least attempt to seriously discuss the topic at hand and my points about it. I truly appreciate it.

The palm and fingers do not matter. My point was that my experience demonstrates a logical and verifiable way to measure his cock under a more ideal condition where the true length of its actual shaft (not the radius of its curve that doesn't actually function in any way in sex) could be more accurately measured. As long as the hands are able to hold and wrap themselves around the dick like in masturbation, they should give a pretty standard length estimate of around 8 inches. Again, you don't have to take my word for it, use a ruler. Any remaining shaft length not covered by the hands could then be easily estimated visually because it is a screenshot of a video. Of course, if we could find an actual measurement of Stroke's cock in that same position, it would be more ideal. But until then, we do an easy thought experiment using a ruler to verify my claimed experience. (The pixelation doesn't really matter unless you're intent on actually measuring down to the micrometer, then feel free to look for a similar shot among his oeuvre, hopefully in 4K resolution lol. But I'm posting the source video I used below.)

BTW, all anybody needs to once and for all abandon all thought that that dick could possibly be just 6.5 inches is that you could never do a 2-hand stroke on any cock less than 7 inches. Try doing it and see for yourself. And if anybody still thinks one normal-sized hand could cover that entire length when you can clearly see how relatively dwarfed that hand in the picture is (and she's not in any way a tiny girl either), they're simply not interested in the truth.

Regading your last point, if you actually read my hundreds of exlplanations by this point, I clearly explained the several distinct ways how certain disadvantaged measurements will tend to predominate under particular conditions. I haven't actually seen all these supposed measurements but the 2 pictures I've seen so far in the thread including the latest one below clearly demonstrates two reasons why they got that 7.5 or 8 measurement of the RADIUS of his curved cock, not the actual length of its very flesh. I don't want to repeat myself for the Nth time yet again, but it would suffice to say here that being measured while standing up definitely does seem to retract some of the base of his shaft. That plus the use of a straight device for measuring I think decreases his number by around 2.5 to 3.5 inches. If people refuse to even read my explanations and arguments and then insist on a "counter-argument" that's invalid from the get go because it was already pre-refuted by a previous post of mine, then it's clear they're not really interested in a serious discussion. They just want to do a SERMON AND PROSELYTIZE THEIR BELIEFS and condemn those who refuse to believe. This thread really does exhibit the hallmarks of a religion for sure.

Kortney Kane In Black Stockings Porn Videos - Tube8

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

And ? we all need arbitary rules for understand what we are talking about

For exemple if eveyrone have his own technic for measure, then some will start from the belly button, some other from the asshole etc... and you cant compare.

When you measure a person heigh, you mesure in a STRAIGHT way from feet to head, if a woman have curvature lets say big boobs, then you will not use a tape and follow the curve of her boobs, otherwise she will heigh way higher than real. wich its stupid since you measured her boobs in the way, and not only the heigh

And just saying I have the same upward curve as criss strokes, but when measuring you can straight up your curve, also if you lose a bit of erection its not a big difference

My point about the arbitrariness of sticking to just one method no matter what is that it results precisely in bizarre under-measurements of a famous huge penis that's so unusually long even for porn that I assumed most people would find the 6.5 inches bizarre and ridiculous as well, not be considered as "gospel and irrefutable truth."

Of course, all of our chosen methods are by nature arbitrary and so saying only one of them is valid has no logical justification over the others because every method has its own advantage and use. I do think insisting on using a rigid measuring device like a ruler or caliper for an organ that's as varied in shape as humans are is a stupid idea because it will only be good for super-straight cocks that are probably in the minority. For curved and unusually shaped ones, it will only measure the radius or the shortest straight line to its tip, not the actual length of the actual organic body part. So that then defeats the intended purpose of standardizing the measurements and also invalidates the data because only the straight penises have valid measurements. I suggest using a tape measure instead if we actually want to measure what needs to be measured in a way that doesn't put curved dicks at a disadvantage. The standardization should then come from consistently using the same methodology (including starting/end points, the side of the penis being measured and the man in a sitting position in order to expose the maximum length of the penis shaft) for all cases that will then be more fair because the actual lengths and not imaginary straight lines are going to be measured in every case. I hope I cleared that all up for you.

 

[porra]

Hey man, all jokes aside Nobody is going to have a serious discussion with you cause all you're doing is criticize anyone who tries to explain their opinion about Chris strokes size.
So because of your "experience" we are supposed to throw away all common sense and start believing everything you said?
You posted a bunch of pics of guys dicks being measured starting from the balls to the tip or from the side while they're laying down and you want us to accept your logic? Come on, get a grip.
We all know that the correct way to measure is standing up with the penis straight perpendicular to the body and a ruler on top starting from the base to the tip.
At first it was funny reading your attempts at trying to make us believe your stories but its getting annoying now.

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

Hey man, all jokes aside Nobody is going to have a serious discussion with you cause all you're doing is criticize anyone who tries to explain their opinion about Chris strokes size.
So because of your "experience" we are supposed to throw away all common sense and start believing everything you said?
You posted a bunch of pics of guys dicks being measured starting from the balls to the tip or from the side while they're laying down and you want us to accept your logic? Come on, get a grip.
We all know that the correct way to measure is standing up with the penis straight perpendicular to the body and a ruler on top starting from the base to the tip.
At first it was funny reading your attempts at trying to make us believe your stories but its getting annoying now.

What "nobody?" Ocine just did! Can you read? How old are you?

What legit opinion have you actually posted? See, again, I didn't even try to read the rest of your nonsense because your very first sentence already stated a couple of irritating complete falsehoods right out of the gate! I don't criticize stupidity and nonsense. I ridicule and make fun of them, just as they deserve. So if that is what you got, it's because you said nothing that actually addressed my actual points directly, if there was even anything worth taking seriously. And you're doing precisely the same thing again, predictably.

Notice how I responded properly and talked about actual salient points with Ocine? Because he presented them without any of the useless drivel you people say,, because you can't actually say anything about the logic of my points. Otherwise, you would have had legit critiques and arguments that deserve to be dignified with the proper response.

I posted a short piece that actually didn't discuss any other issues that I alredy discussed elsewhere. It was just about the topic and nothing else. No jokes, no insults, no clapbacks. I presented it as straightforwardly, clearly and simply as I could so to give you an opportunity to weigh in without your emotional outbursts. STILL NOTHING. Just another attempt to attack, discredit and delegitimize anything I say. WHY THE FUCK DO YOU CARE SO MUCH ABOUT A PORN STAR'S DICK BEING SMALLER THAN THE ASSUMED SIZE?! How does it affect you if the claimed measurements don't hold up to scrutiny?

I'm actually just doing all this out of boredom and as an exercise in argumentation and logic. I don't really care about the principals of this issue lol. I'm more interested in the whole psychology of it all, the rejection of all obvious indicators, logic and evidence to stick with a belief in something unorthodox and even nonsensical and patently false. This thread, I genuinely do find psychologically and sociologically fascinating. But you clearly have issues related to it and are genuinely invested in this "religion." I mean, why give this much fuck about 3 extra inches of a porn star?! Hilarious and fascinating! It's all so Trumpian.

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

Hey man, all jokes aside Nobody is going to have a serious discussion with you cause all you're doing is criticize anyone who tries to explain their opinion about Chris strokes size.
So because of your "experience" we are supposed to throw away all common sense and start believing everything you said?
You posted a bunch of pics of guys dicks being measured starting from the balls to the tip or from the side while they're laying down and you want us to accept your logic? Come on, get a grip.
We all know that the correct way to measure is standing up with the penis straight perpendicular to the body and a ruler on top starting from the base to the tip.
At first it was funny reading your attempts at trying to make us believe your stories but its getting annoying now.

I was about to leave this god-forsaken place but while scrolling up, I accidentally caught your stupid attempt at "argumentation and logic" by saying "we all know we use a ruler...so that is what should be."

Look, you pathetic, hopeless case, saying "this is the way it is and so just follow it and STFU" does not even come anywhere near making some sort of sense, if that is what you thought you were doing. I come from the world of science. I was a biology major in and did my thesis in the microbiology lab while also getting a full and well-rounded liberal arts education in the humanities and philosophy in college before I got my MD. So I am used to and trained in relying on logic, reason, evidence, the scientific method and facts. If we operated like you do, we'd be killing you inadvertently. A lot of thought is involved before we even get to writing your prescriptions. It's not just "Heeey nurse, what did I just give the old lady before this old queen carrying a ruler came in? Oh that? Okay then. That has always been what we automatically give to these hag queens no matter what they come in here for, so let's not change the routine. But, you know what, I think it's time to give her the dose she needs." (That is not what you want and need, needless to say. Lol. But that is what you just advised to others thinking it's "sensible." It's not.) But I'll give you what you want and need anyway:

Px: Mrs. Porra E. Stupida
79 y/o, 79 years too many
Dx: F20.0
Rx: Haloperidol decanoate, 100mg/mL
# 1 liter

Sig: Inject per IV bolus rapidly. STAT!

 

[Narz]

lol is this guy seriously arguing that Chris is 10 inches? Hilariously delusional

 

[truehungey]

I can have 5 hands around mine at the same time. Am i 20 inches? FYI there was also a study of 15 000 men where the biggest found was 7 inches.

Also its really weird how sensitive and emotional you are about this

 

[Narz]

FYI there was also a study of 15 000 men where the biggest found was 7 inches.

That's the Veale Meta-Analysis (which isn't a study in itself, but merely gathers information from various available studies) and you are presenting it very, very wrongly.

1. They didn't measure 15.000 erect penises. They only measured 432 erect.

2. They found more bigger ones than you claim. For example the Wessels et al 1996 study they included had a maximum value of 19cm (7.5 inch) for NBP and 21cm (8.5 inch) for BP erect length among their 80 participants. The Schneider study also had one with 19cm among their 111 participants. Both of these studies found someone over 7 inches, and both of these studies had far less than 15.000 participants.

3. If you only look at the 432 erect measurements across various studies (Wessels, Schneider, etc) then 7 inch is top 12% for BP length (which would be 1.777 out of 15.000) and top 3% of NBP length (which would be 327 out of 15.000).

Your claim is that the biggest one among 15.000 men was 7 inches, although the reality is that they had multiple 7 inchers and a 8.5 incher among 432 men.

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

lol is this guy seriously arguing that Chris is 10 inches? Hilariously delusional

I never said that I was 100% sure he's 10 inches but he's at least 9 to 9.5 and DEFINITELY not at all your WISHFUL THINKING that he's only around 6 or just a tad longer than yours. Talk about being TRULY DELUSIONAL and ILLOGICAL. Lmao!!

 

[HMS]

What about his girth size? No one mention about his circumference size, not just only his length

 

[Dr_Feelgood_LV]

I can have 5 hands around mine at the same time. Am i 20 inches? FYI there was also a study of 15 000 men where the biggest found was 7 inches.

Also its really weird how sensitive and emotional you are about this

Who said "5 HANDS?! Only you. I said TWO. You people will say just about anything to "prove" that your dicks are just an inch shorter than a porn star with close to 10 REAL INCHES. Talk about being so sensitive, emotional and DELUSIONAL about your insecurities due to an appendage challenge. Lmao!!!