Disadvantages of being uncut?

[UncutViking]

No issues. Just pleasure.

Same goes for me. Although when entering puberty, I could not retract the skin past the head. Tugging and stretching helped some, and eventually I mananged to fully retract when erect. I remember feeling releived and proud. Pulling the skin back and forth obviously lead to maturbation, which I still fucking love. Don't know how many millions of times the skin had been pulled back and forth over my head creating wonderful pleasure.

 

[Jagtstein]

I'm glad I still have my foreskin, it can be perfectly masturbate with it. With the cleanliness I have no problems because I (Sex masturbation) washing the glans (glans) when retracted foreskin, twice a day and after use.
But the frenulum prepuce remove (frenulectomy) I can only recommend that the benefits are:
1 The foreskin can move backwards, thus has a larger stroke during masturbation possible and the foreskin is more flexible.
2 The penis looks better, because the foreskin can almost unwrinkled pull back.
3 The penis can be kept much better clean.
I have the frenulum with three interventions completely removed itself. But every urologist does that too
View media item 1162512[video=medium]1115421[/video]View media item 1100295View media item 1033518

 

[Mcuthigh]

OK...Let's get real. There is a lot of total BS in recent years concerning a political correctness over the issue of foreskin. In the U.S., they propose HPV vaccinations now for all boys when statistically uncut boys are primarily at risk. They don't have the balls to identify uncut boys only as requiring the series of innoculations. They would have the cut boys to take the shots becasue they are afraid to tell the truth. The truth is that uncut is far from being as perfect as the radicals would have you think. Cleanliness of the uncut IS an issue in all but first world countries and even there it requires a diligence greater than with cut guys. Do publc hairs get caught in many foreskins that is not possible for cut guys....you bet and it can hurt like hell. Do loose foreskins irritate the glans during physical exercise by rolling back and forth constantly. Absolutely. Everyone knows about phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis, urinary tract infections, etc, etc. that identifies with uncut. I know of a kid who was uncut and who suffered with UTI's and phimosis well into his teens and he wet the bed well into high school. And how long does a young boy have to deal with these issues before someone decides to just get him cut. Personally, I find my cut cock fully functoinal with no stretching or pulling or restoration needed. I have never witnessed damaged cut dicks that the foreskin radicals scour the internet to copy and claim as the norm. The vast, vast majority of cut dudes silently get on with life and like the beautiful aestetics and comfort that our parents responsibly chose for us and a competent doctor provided. Our circumcisions were cheaper and far less complicated and not the result of years of fussihg with foreskin before the decision is made to get it done. Please just don't think that we cut dudes got a raw deal just because you have to listen to a very few cut dudes who feel they were denied the right to experience the maladies of the foreskin or then there are the women who have found a decidedly male issue with which they can claim retribution and control.

 

[50551]

I am so happy to be uncut. There are no issues with it, only advantages.

 

[David Lucaya]

OK...Let's get real. There is a lot of total BS in recent years concerning a political correctness over the issue of foreskin. The vast, vast majority of cut dudes silently get on with life and like the beautiful aestetics and comfort that our parents responsibly chose for us and a competent doctor provided. Our circumcisions were cheaper and far less complicated and not the result of years of fussihg with foreskin before the decision is made to get it done. Please just don't think that we cut dudes got a raw deal just because you have to listen to a very few cut dudes who feel they were denied the right to experience the maladies of the foreskin or then there are the women who have found a decidedly male issue with which they can claim retribution and control.

I just wanted to state that I didn't make this thread to make anyone feel like being uncut or cut is superior to the other I think both claims are pretty dumb honestly.
All I wanted to know is if in people's personal experience have they had these problems or have they met people that have had these problems or is it all a big running joke.
Please guys don't make this some fight between which is better or some political debate.
Thanks

 

[1197730]

OK...Let's get real. There is a lot of total BS in recent years concerning a political correctness over the issue of foreskin. In the U.S., they propose HPV vaccinations now for all boys when statistically uncut boys are primarily at risk. They don't have the balls to identify uncut boys only as requiring the series of innoculations. They would have the cut boys to take the shots becasue they are afraid to tell the truth. The truth is that uncut is far from being as perfect as the radicals would have you think. Cleanliness of the uncut IS an issue in all but first world countries and even there it requires a diligence greater than with cut guys. Do publc hairs get caught in many foreskins that is not possible for cut guys....you bet and it can hurt like hell. Do loose foreskins irritate the glans during physical exercise by rolling back and forth constantly. Absolutely. Everyone knows about phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis, urinary tract infections, etc, etc. that identifies with uncut. I know of a kid who was uncut and who suffered with UTI's and phimosis well into his teens and he wet the bed well into high school. And how long does a young boy have to deal with these issues before someone decides to just get him cut. Personally, I find my cut cock fully functoinal with no stretching or pulling or restoration needed. I have never witnessed damaged cut dicks that the foreskin radicals scour the internet to copy and claim as the norm. The vast, vast majority of cut dudes silently get on with life and like the beautiful aestetics and comfort that our parents responsibly chose for us and a competent doctor provided. Our circumcisions were cheaper and far less complicated and not the result of years of fussihg with foreskin before the decision is made to get it done. Please just don't think that we cut dudes got a raw deal just because you have to listen to a very few cut dudes who feel they were denied the right to experience the maladies of the foreskin or then there are the women who have found a decidedly male issue with which they can claim retribution and control.

The main issue is that people are having this surgery done to them while they were children, without choice and causing great pain, and there ARE occasionally complications. The foreskin is a natural part of the human anatomy. But enough about that. As a "foreskin radical", let me break down some of the stuff youre talking about and prove my case

In the U.S., they propose HPV vaccinations now for all boys when statistically uncut boys are primarily at risk. They don't have the balls to identify uncut boys only as requiring the series of innoculations. They would have the cut boys to take the shots becasue they are afraid to tell the truth.

Now, if you're using circumcision as a defense against infections, based only on statistics, I'm sorry but that's just plain stupid. You stop infections with vaccines and protection like condoms. Not by lopping off the end of your dick. You can get testicular cancer but you dont cut off your balls unless you have a damn good reason. The fact is, anyone can get HPV cut or uncut. Saying otherwise is just disingenuous and dangerous.

Cleanliness of the uncut IS an issue in all but first world countries and even there it requires a diligence greater than with cut guys.

Taking a shower once or twice a day can cure that. There is this thing called soap you know. Your hands are one of the dirtiest parts on your body, but you don't go chopping them off for cleanliness reasons. And before you rebutt that "Hands are actually useful while foreskins aren't", let me tell you that the foreskin has several uses. It covers your head while flaccid, keeping it protected and moistened and protects it it from keratization, which is when the glans skin thickens, dries out and becomes less sensitive. It provides a rolling friction during masturbation and sex, which is when the skin rolls over the penis itself, which renders our need for lube, very minimal or non-existent. It enhances pleasure and sensitivity greatly. The foreskin is said to contain over 20,000 nerve receptors and is one of the most sensitive parts on the penis, especially the frenulum

Do publc hairs get caught in many foreskins that is not possible for cut guys....you bet and it can hurt like hell.

I think this says more about the length of your pubic hair than the presence of a foreskin. And cutting off your foreskin for something as simple as this is again, downright stupid. If your penis is caught in a zipper, are you going to lop it off too? Or how bout your little toe if you knock it against the coffee table?

Do loose foreskins irritate the glans during physical exercise by rolling back and forth constantly. Absolutely.

This one is the most laughable. Lets see. Which do you think is worse for the glans? The foreskin, a natural soft, skin which is designed from day one to cover protect the glans from irritation or friction during physical movement? Or leaving the glans exposed to the irritation and friction of the clothes you're talking about. I'll let you decide

Everyone knows about phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis, urinary tract infections, etc, etc. that identifies with uncut. I know of a kid who was uncut and who suffered with UTI's and phimosis well into his teens and he wet the bed well into high school. And how long does a young boy have to deal with these issues before someone decides to just get him cut.

Yes there are a few medical conditions that can afflict the foreskin, but several of these are easily solved without circumcision. For example, phimosis can be solved with stretching and over the counter steroid cream, and in the event they cant, then of-course its a good idea to remove the foreskin, as it is a medical condition. In the same vein it is a good idea to amputate an arm or a leg if it is a medical condition, but doing it isnt something you do as a routine. Its not like the tonsils which serve no useful function. The foreskin do have important uses.

Personally, I find my cut cock fully functoinal with no stretching or pulling or restoration needed. I have never witnessed damaged cut dicks that the foreskin radicals scour the internet to copy and claim as the norm.

I'm happy you're fully functional down there, but thats just your experience. I've met several men who struggle with the loss of circumcision, and some of them were even depressed due to its loss. If an adult man wishes to make that choice to become circumcised then i say let him. Its his body. But parents shouldn't be making this life changing choice for their children, with no medical justification, and the often casual and superficial reasons like "I was circumcised so he should be too." or "Everyone gets circumcised."

The vast, vast majority of cut dudes silently get on with life and like the beautiful aestetics and comfort that our parents responsibly chose for us and a competent doctor provided.

And thats good for them, but again, they should be the ones to have that choice. Furthermore, the "aesthetics and comfort" is wholly subjective.

Our circumcisions were cheaper and far less complicated and not the result of years of fussihg with foreskin before the decision is made to get it done.

Not doing a circumcision is free! At least when you spend years fussing with it, you get a chance to experience it and come to a decision on your own. And who knows, maybe you'll decide to keep the thing! Oh wait....the vast majority of uncut people do decide to keep it. Who would have thought?

Please just don't think that we cut dudes got a raw deal just because you have to listen to a very few cut dudes who feel they were denied the right to experience the maladies of the foreskin or then there are the women who have found a decidedly male issue with which they can claim retribution and control.

So don't these "very few cut dudes" matter? Don't they have a right to speak out about the benefits they had taken away from them on the casual whims of their parents? And can only men speak about men's issues? Why cant women speak out about them as well?


I'm normally tolerant of other people's beliefs, but when these beliefs cause serious harm (like with antivaxxers), thats where i draw the line and speak out. If it is based on personal or religious beliefs, or it is due to medical conditions, then by all means, get cut! You wont hear anything from me. But this is a choice that should be made by the person in question, and by nobody else. People have a right to their own bodies. To cut off such an intimate and important part, without leaving them any choice, is just downright cruel. Circumcision, apart from the Jews, really gained popularity due to the efforts of John Harvey Kellog, who advocated it as a means of reducing masturbation in boys, because he knew that it reduced sensitivity.

But hey, what do i know. I'm just a foreskin radical. So I leave you with this: A statement on non therapeutic circumcision of boys given by the presidents of the 6 national member organizations of the Nordic Association for Clinical Sexology

http://nacs.eu/data/press_release001.pdf

 

[deleted994557]

The main issue is that people are having this surgery done to them while they were children, without choice and causing great pain, and there ARE occasionally complications. The foreskin is a natural part of the human anatomy. But enough about that. As a "foreskin radical", let me break down some of the stuff youre talking about and prove my case



Now, if you're using circumcision as a defense against infections, based only on statistics, I'm sorry but that's just plain stupid. You stop infections with vaccines and protection like condoms. Not by lopping off the end of your dick. You can get testicular cancer but you dont cut off your balls unless you have a damn good reason. The fact is, anyone can get HPV cut or uncut. Saying otherwise is just disingenuous and dangerous.



Taking a shower once or twice a day can cure that. There is this thing called soap you know. Your hands are one of the dirtiest parts on your body, but you don't go chopping them off for cleanliness reasons. And before you rebutt that "Hands are actually useful while foreskins aren't", let me tell you that the foreskin has several uses. It covers your head while flaccid, keeping it protected and moistened and protects it it from keratization, which is when the glans skin thickens, dries out and becomes less sensitive. It provides a rolling friction during masturbation and sex, which is when the skin rolls over the penis itself, which renders our need for lube, very minimal or non-existent. It enhances pleasure and sensitivity greatly. The foreskin is said to contain over 20,000 nerve receptors and is one of the most sensitive parts on the penis, especially the frenulum



I think this says more about the length of your pubic hair than the presence of a foreskin. And cutting off your foreskin for something as simple as this is again, downright stupid. If your penis is caught in a zipper, are you going to lop it off too? Or how bout your little toe if you knock it against the coffee table?



This one is the most laughable. Lets see. Which do you think is worse for the glans? The foreskin, a natural soft, skin which is designed from day one to cover protect the glans from irritation or friction during physical movement? Or leaving the glans exposed to the irritation and friction of the clothes you're talking about. I'll let you decide




Yes there are a few medical conditions that can afflict the foreskin, but several of these are easily solved without circumcision. For example, phimosis can be solved with over the counter stretching and steroid cream, and in the event they cant, then of-course its a good idea to remove the foreskin, as it is a medical condition. In the same vein it is a good idea to amputate an arm or a leg if it is a medical condition, but doing it isnt something you do as a routine. Its not like the tonsils which serve no useful function. The foreskin do have important uses.



I'm happy you're fully functional down there, but thats just your experience. I've met several men who struggle with the loss of circumcision, and some of them were even depressed due to its loss. If an adult man wishes to make that choice to become circumcised then i say let him. Its his body. But parents shouldn't be making this life changing choice for their children, with no medical justification, and the often casual and superficial reasons like "I was circumcised so he should be too." or "Everyone gets circumcised."



And thats good for them, but again, they should be the ones to have that choice.




Not doing a circumcision is free!




So don't these "very few cut dudes" matter? Don't they have a right to speak out about the benefits they had taken away from them on the casual whims of their parents? And can only men speak about men's issues? Why cant women speak out about them as well?


I'm normally tolerant of other people's beliefs, but when these beliefs cause serious harm (like with antivaxxers), thats where i draw the line and speak out. If it is based on personal or religious beliefs, or it is due to medical conditions, then by all means, get cut! You wont hear anything from me. But this is a choice that should be made by the person in question, and by nobody else. People have a right to their own bodies. To cut off such an intimate and important part, without leaving them any choice, is just downright cruel. Circumcision, apart from the Jews, really gained popularity due to the efforts of John Harvey Kellog, who advocated it as a means of reducing masturbation in boys, because he knew that it reduced sensitivity.

But hey, what do i know. I'm just a foreskin radical. So I leave you with this: A statement on non therapeutic circumcision of boys given by the presidents of the 6 national member organizations of the Nordic Association for Clinical Sexology

http://nacs.eu/data/press_release001.pdf

I’m here for this comment. Like you said, there can be genuine need for circumcision but without genuine need it’s all a bit fucked up. I love having my foreskin. I’ve had partners in the past that have needed to get them — so they did and that’s all good. But why do it otherwise?

 

[soundsgreat87]

found the circumcision fetishist

OK...Let's get real. There is a lot of total BS in recent years concerning a political correctness over the issue of foreskin. In the U.S., they propose HPV vaccinations now for all boys when statistically uncut boys are primarily at risk. They don't have the balls to identify uncut boys only as requiring the series of innoculations. They would have the cut boys to take the shots becasue they are afraid to tell the truth. The truth is that uncut is far from being as perfect as the radicals would have you think. Cleanliness of the uncut IS an issue in all but first world countries and even there it requires a diligence greater than with cut guys. Do publc hairs get caught in many foreskins that is not possible for cut guys....you bet and it can hurt like hell. Do loose foreskins irritate the glans during physical exercise by rolling back and forth constantly. Absolutely. Everyone knows about phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis, urinary tract infections, etc, etc. that identifies with uncut. I know of a kid who was uncut and who suffered with UTI's and phimosis well into his teens and he wet the bed well into high school. And how long does a young boy have to deal with these issues before someone decides to just get him cut. Personally, I find my cut cock fully functoinal with no stretching or pulling or restoration needed. I have never witnessed damaged cut dicks that the foreskin radicals scour the internet to copy and claim as the norm. The vast, vast majority of cut dudes silently get on with life and like the beautiful aestetics and comfort that our parents responsibly chose for us and a competent doctor provided. Our circumcisions were cheaper and far less complicated and not the result of years of fussihg with foreskin before the decision is made to get it done. Please just don't think that we cut dudes got a raw deal just because you have to listen to a very few cut dudes who feel they were denied the right to experience the maladies of the foreskin or then there are the women who have found a decidedly male issue with which they can claim retribution and control.

 

[IntactMale]

I haven't had any problems with my foreskin. No smell, no cleanliness issues, I take showers so of course these aren't problems. I never had phimosis. No smegma. No over abundance of moisture, at least not that I recognize, the amount of moisture seems normal to me, its all I've known.

Despite what some people think about guys with foreskins, I've also never had an STD, but I really appreciate the implication @Mcuthigh.

I've never encountered anyone in person who had any problem with my foreskin, physically or visually. In fact for some people I've been with its been a novelty.

The only problem I've had is that on website like this one there are people who are militantly opposed to the human body in its normal, complete state. Like most people who are angry in their position, its usually because they are dissatisfied about their own condition. Oddly, these people are opposed to the idea of stopping routine infant circumcision, even though if it had been stopped earlier then they wouldn't be in their current state, at least not without their own consent. I guess sometimes when you feel you've had to go through something bad you want others to go through it as well rather than prevent the practice from continuing.

The only problem with my foreskin is been the anti-foreskin culture that these people perpetuate.

 

[CJF88]

I hate my foreskin, it gets in the way, it gets torn, my bango has split on several occasions. Very much looking forward to being cut soon!

 

[dude77007]

I hate my foreskin, it gets in the way, it gets torn, my bango has split on several occasions. Very much looking forward to being cut soon!

Aren't you pleased that you are in a position to decide based on your OWN personal experience with your foreskin and make the decision yourself.

 

[1141702]

Being circumcised, I hate having to see what I consider damage every time I look at myself. It’s depressing and nags at me every single day. People that have the choice, no matter what they choose, would be happy with that choice. What hurts the most about it all is that it was done for absolutely no reason and I am the one that has to live with a choice that should have been mine to make but wasn’t.

Restoration has provided benefits to my physical as well as mental self.

 

[oliverrevilo]

Being circumcised, I hate having to see what I consider damage every time I look at myself. It’s depressing and nags at me every single day. People that have the choice, no matter what they choose, would be happy with that choice. What hurts the most about it all is that it was done for absolutely no reason and I am the one that has to live with a choice that should have been mine to make but wasn’t.

Restoration has provided benefits to my physical as well as mental self.

You are an inspiration my friend DildoSwaggins

 

[CJF88]

Aren't you pleased that you are in a position to decide based on your OWN personal experience with your foreskin and make the decision yourself.

Yes I am, I am very fortunate. I am pro circumcision, but I do believe that young men should be given the choice.

 

[Dave NoCal]

Yes I am, I am very fortunate. I am pro circumcision, but I do believe that young men should be given the choice.

How about infants?

 

[1197730]

How about infants?

What about them? Leave them be until they're adults and can decide. In any case, i think the screaming and crying when you try to cut it off is more than enough indication that they dont want to be cut at that time

 

[Dave NoCal]

What about them? Leave them be until they're adults and can decide. In any case, i think the screaming and crying when you try to cut it off is more than enough indication that they dont want to be cut at that time

That is my point.

 

[MisterVIP]

Disadvantages of being uncut: NONE WHATSOEVER.

 

[J32]

I think I have a pretty awesome foreskin because I look cut when I’m hard and don’t have the long extended foreskin that I know takes a little more work to keep clean. But that’s where my disadvantage comes in. The short fs makes for a tight frenulum and that can get sore and even gets little cuts from rough sex. Doc has recommended a circumcision but that’s not something I really want to consider for now.

 

[1197730]

I think I have a pretty awesome foreskin because I look cut when I’m hard and don’t have the long extended foreskin that I know takes a little more work to keep clean. But that’s where my disadvantage comes in. The short fs makes for a tight frenulum and that can get sore and even gets little cuts from rough sex. Doc has recommended a circumcision but that’s not something I really want to consider for now.

ask him about frenulectomy using the tie off method. Its what i did. It cuts the frenulum while keeping the foreskin and the frenulum nerves. All the benefits, none of the drawbacks