Dutch Weaver

Hi, I was the one that once made this thread a few a years ago with a prior account. I was in "love" with the Dutch Weaver figure, but now that I know this... I totally regret making threads like this and how it all went down hill... I wish the woman is in a better place now with the Lord, and not suffering. I pray that the family and friends have peace too in Jesus name.

Hope you have a peaceful week and God bless you all.

I am deeply sorry and concerned about these news.
 
Honestly, if anyone knows how to delete this thread or report it so it gets deleted, will be appreciated. For the sake of my mind, I don't want to remember that this page existed...
 
Hi, I was the one that once made this thread a few a years ago with a prior account. I was in "emotional interpersonal link" with the Dutch Weaver figure, but now that I know this... I totally regret making threads like this and how it all went down hill... I wish the woman is in a better place now with the Lord, and not suffering. I pray that the family and friends have peace too in Jesus name.

Hope you have a peaceful week and God bless you all.

I am deeply sorry and concerned about these news.
Honestly, if anyone knows how to delete this thread or report it so it gets deleted, will be appreciated. For the sake of my mind, I don't want to remember that this page existed...
It's not your fault. Just contact LPSG admins or support and they will do it for you either close it or delete it
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted24911431
i know right! he seemed so sweet in his GH solo video! I don't condone murder or violence at all but there's gotta be something more to the story that we don't know. I read that he had a hearing on Jan. 27 but can't find any more info as far his sentencing.
We never know more about the story when it comes to sensationalized news media. It presents the side that people want to read/hear; the side that will generate town gossip the best.

Shouts, bickers and threat of "breaking up" doesn't fully answer the question.

What were the underlying, true reasons why he shot her to begin with? What were the events and psychological factors that developed over time to have lead up to this voluntary/unvoluntary decision? Was the girl culpable in something that we didn't forsee? Something that we'll never find out because her dirty secret died with her? Was he really trying to save her?

Just a reminder: news is 10% truth, 90% tabloid.

I'm not making an excuse for murder. Just pointing out that, in rough agreement with hu_gar, that we don't know everything that's going on.

Possibly, but reading it I think the comment more so implies/shows that their circle of family/friends had heard he was bad news from her (most likely leading up to and during breaking up with him) not necessarily that she publicly exposed him on the internet?

And then possible motivation was that he could not handle that she had moved on from him/didn’t want to be with him and that’s why he attacked the new boyfriend first. When the police didn’t book him for that assault (which they should/could have according to the comment) that’s when it escalated into the shooting. To say if it was a “you hurt me so I’m going to hurt you” or “if I can’t have you no one can” type situation who knows, all I do know is I hope her family gets justice for her
Be careful hanging on the every word of a news article.

Let me tell you a little non-fictional testimony. There was once a gay man, RGHRGH, who had a physically violent, emotionally/mentally abusive older sister; who was the spoiled princess brat of the family. Never could she do wrong in the eyes of their father, who was the same kind of hot-headed bully; the same kind of violent idiot.

This older sister had virulently put her hands on her little brother more times in a year than a sumo wrestler had done in during one year of matches; all to subdue him to do things in the way she wants it done. She had hunted down little dweebish things that the brother hid from her, knowing that she destroy it like it was sport. She had angrily attempted to force him to take off his shirt at a public pool because he's "a boy", despite knowing how uncomfortable he feels doing it. She had walked in on him changing (intentionally) and commented in a rash manner about his changing habits, appearance and style. She had demanded that, when he got done using the bathroom, she be let in to see his shit in the toilet bowl.

And, those were just a few of the vile, criminal, sexually-offensive acts of aggression that she had regularly performed.

What was the father's excuse for her doing this? She loved her little brother and just wanted to teach him to be good. Yeah, okay. So she got a little too rough with him, and she shouldn't have. It was wrong. Blah-die-blah. But, she had his best interest at heart.

(Father's logicality: Just because the public thinks acts likes hers are reprehensible doesn't mean that they are; when, between just the sister and brother (away from public eyes), her ultimate meaning was to making him good. After all, the public doesn't know the brother like the sister knows him.)

...

When my father shares about his star princess daughter and his troubled son, obviously, he presented my sister as being the loving all-successful daughter who loved her younger brother; and me as the troubled failure of whom "he still loves". They never learned what was behind my social awkwardness and academic/social struggles. All they saw was a troubled son who the father "loves anyways"... because that's the way the loudmouth tabloid (my father) presented the story.

See? People don't know the whole story. They only know what the news article tells them, and it's always presented in a way that would favor a bias.

As a survivor of abuse, I live on today to make the best of life, despite the numerous psychological scars that I have suffered. I put up with this for more than 2 decades.

It's because of my life's story that has made me more than sensitive to the articles I read. Just like you don't know everything that I had suffered in the hands of my familial tormenters, you don't know that Emmett Metzger (aka Dutch Weaver) is an all-to-nothing murderer who "deserves to rot in jail".
Just realize that there's more to the story than what meets the surface.


Gurl wtf is wrong with men :emoji_angry:
I think you can definitely be a little bit more honest and integrous than that.
 
With all that said, murder is never a solution.
There was still so much life left in this young woman.
I pray that God be with her friends, family and others who care deeply about her; to aid and heal in the very wounds that this horrific incident must have permanently caused them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12loner and Lee23
Not reading all of that
Oops. Looks like it's there for others to follow the conversation along, anyways;
and, more so, for them to realize what you were deliberately attempting to evade from,
when you were made to question your worldview on what you read in news articles.


At the end of the day, he murdered her. As someone who only knows him from porn, that’s all I need to know and to move on from.
Hey, whatever makes you happy, elusive wapiti.
All you've done is made yourself look like a shallow brat; who's unwilling to "be taught" or "be corrected". (for a lack of better terms at the moment)
That's not my problem.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm guessing what you'll now do is skim my post and mis-summarize it with some watered-down (or simply erroneous) reiteration of it. Probably ending with some childishly smartmouth, threadbare final line, like "get a life" or "get a hobby". I know, I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12loner
Something which some survivors of abuse have rightly kept at their side; for decades, even; in hope's to live on and share their testimony today
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12loner
We never know more about the story when it comes to sensationalized news media. It presents the side that people want to read/hear; the side that will generate town gossip the best.

Shouts, bickers and threat of "breaking up" doesn't fully answer the question.

What were the underlying, true reasons why he shot her to begin with? What were the events and psychological factors that developed over time to have lead up to this voluntary/unvoluntary decision? Was the girl culpable in something that we didn't forsee? Something that we'll never find out because her dirty secret died with her? Was he really trying to save her?

Just a reminder: news is 10% truth, 90% tabloid.

I'm not making an excuse for murder. Just pointing out that, in rough agreement with hu_gar, that we don't know everything that's going on.


Be careful hanging on the every word of a news article.

Let me tell you a little non-fictional testimony. There was once a gay man, RGHRGH, who had a physically violent, emotionally/mentally abusive older sister; who was the spoiled princess brat of the family. Never could she do wrong in the eyes of their father, who was the same kind of hot-headed bully; the same kind of violent idiot.

This older sister had virulently put her hands on her little brother more times in a year than a sumo wrestler had done in during one year of matches; all to subdue him to do things in the way she wants it done. She had hunted down little dweebish things that the brother hid from her, knowing that she destroy it like it was sport. She had angrily attempted to force him to take off his shirt at a public pool because he's "a boy", despite knowing how uncomfortable he feels doing it. She had walked in on him changing (intentionally) and commented in a rash manner about his changing habits, appearance and style. She had demanded that, when he got done using the bathroom, she be let in to see his shit in the toilet bowl.

And, those were just a few of the vile, criminal, sexually-offensive acts of aggression that she had regularly performed.

What was the father's excuse for her doing this? She loved her little brother and just wanted to teach him to be good. Yeah, okay. So she got a little too rough with him, and she shouldn't have. It was wrong. Blah-die-blah. But, she had his best interest at heart.

(Father's logicality: Just because the public thinks acts likes hers are reprehensible doesn't mean that they are; when, between just the sister and brother (away from public eyes), her ultimate meaning was to making him good. After all, the public doesn't know the brother like the sister knows him.)

...

When my father shares about his star princess daughter and his troubled son, obviously, he presented my sister as being the loving all-successful daughter who loved her younger brother; and me as the troubled failure of whom "he still loves". They never learned what was behind my social awkwardness and academic/social struggles. All they saw was a troubled son who the father "loves anyways"... because that's the way the loudmouth tabloid (my father) presented the story.

See? People don't know the whole story. They only know what the news article tells them, and it's always presented in a way that would favor a bias.

As a survivor of abuse, I live on today to make the best of life, despite the numerous psychological scars that I have suffered. I put up with this for more than 2 decades.

It's because of my life's story that has made me more than sensitive to the articles I read. Just like you don't know everything that I had suffered in the hands of my familial tormenters, you don't know that Emmett Metzger (aka Dutch Weaver) is an all-to-nothing murderer who "deserves to rot in jail".
Just realize that there's more to the story than what meets the surface.



I think you can definitely be a little bit more honest and integrous than that.
You know i've never would have guess his defense team was on lpsg.
 
Oops. Looks like it's there for others to follow the conversation along, anyways;
and, more so, for them to realize what you were deliberately attempting to evade from,
when you were made to question your worldview on what you read in news articles.



Hey, whatever makes you happy, elusive wapiti.
All you've done is made yourself look like a shallow brat; who's unwilling to "be taught" or "be corrected". (for a lack of better terms at the moment)
That's not my problem.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm guessing what you'll now do is skim my post and mis-summarize it with some watered-down (or simply erroneous) reiteration of it. Probably ending with some childishly smartmouth, threadbare final line, like "get a life" or "get a hobby". I know, I know.
Nah, babe. Not his lawyer. Just a critical thinker.



Sure, less on the critical less on the thinker. Say the less, no matter what he still murdered her and planned to it. I have the integrity and honesty to say, whether you're on a psychotic break or totally sane, when you pull out a gun on someone you know what are you gonna do, but the ones on his trial already knew that. So your so called "way of arguing and critical thinking" were totally put out there and totally overruled. He murdered his ex out of spite, maybe not on the best mental state, but doesn't take way the fact he knew what he was doing. We know who you are and relative or friend or whatever, is a convicted killer. RIP to his ex and all prayers to her close people that were left hurt, also for the family of Emmet.
 
...no matter what he still murdered her and planned to it....
He planned it? And, there was evidence of this?

Perhaps I missed something. Link and source, please.

....I have the integrity and honesty to say, ...
You can quit attempting to use my own lines to talk around my simple all-encompassing point driven home: that when reading news, one should remember that they may not have the full story.

I don't think I once denied that Emmet Metzger did the wrong thing and didn't deserve jail time; just that you don't know everything that goes on; and may not knw certain information that could alter the trajectory of your opinion. (Consider that different motivations and psychological state does change the meaning of a murder. I highly doubt that if the girlfriend was secretly into children that you'll hold the same "he still committed murder, no matter what his reason" attitude. See? I just provided you one example right there.)
 
There is the dialogue of his call to the police, summarizing:
he shot her and regretted it later. So he called the police and admitted the crime.
There's nothing to defend, if he was capable of that, he should hurt this girl repeatedly..
I don't think that's a very fair assessment.
If he shot her and regretted it, then he did the right thing by deliberately turning his sorry humanity-ripped ass into police.

You don't even know why he did it; and don't know if it was simply the heat of the moment that got out of hand.