He doesn't "have" to post nudes or post consistently, but that doesn't mean people "have" to be satisfied with his onlyfans either. At the end of the day an onlyfans page is a product, and if people paid for that product and weren't satisfied then they're allowed to post a review saying so to let others know if it's something they should spend their money on or not.Also, anyone thinking they’re going to get full frontal nudes that are anything but ‘artistic’ anytime soon, get your tissues out now because I got news: not happening. He’s starting to do more paid partnership content which most likely means his brands won’t want to be associated with nudity.
I know, I know, he’s a bad person for not giving you what he never promised.
I personally had high hopes but he's going down same path some of the other scammers. Jackson did way better and at least showed full cock. His "artsy" attempt is just to stoke his ego and so he can clame he's doing it for the art and not the quick money grab.He doesn't "have" to post nudes or post consistently, but that doesn't mean people "have" to be satisfied with his onlyfans either. At the end of the day an onlyfans page is a product, and if people paid for that product and weren't satisfied then they're allowed to post a review saying so to let others know if it's something they should spend their money on or not.
Jackson posted more than I anticipated but the nudes were really cringey and done weirdly (filters and angles were highly questionable) and are forgettableI personally had high hopes but he's going down same path some of the other scammers. Jackson did way better and at least showed full cock. His "artsy" attempt is just to stoke his ego and so he can clame he's doing it for the art and not the quick money grab.
Oh, believe me, I’m in complete agreement with you. I’m just sarcastically pointing out the faux outrage of some people making demands and feeling entitled. I could see if people aren’t satisfied with the frequency (I’m in that category) but they have no right to be dissatisfied for not posting nudes if such a promise was never extended.He doesn't "have" to post nudes or post consistently, but that doesn't mean people "have" to be satisfied with his onlyfans either. At the end of the day an onlyfans page is a product, and if people paid for that product and weren't satisfied then they're allowed to post a review saying so to let others know if it's something they should spend their money on or not.
I think all OF content creators should take the Cardi B route and say right upfront "NO I WONT BE SHOWING P--SY , T---IES AND A-- ."Oh, believe me, I’m in complete agreement with you. I’m just sarcastically pointing out the faux outrage of some people making demands and feeling entitled. I could see if people aren’t satisfied with the frequency (I’m in that category) but they have no right to be dissatisfied for not posting nudes if such a promise was never extended.
But I don’t think you get it- he doesn’t need to say that he won’t be showing any nudity for it to still hold true. Just because he doesn’t say it doesn’t mean he will or won’t post any.I think all OF content creators should take the Cardi B route and say right upfront "NO I WONT BE SHOWING P--SY , T---IES AND A-- ."
That would save everyone some time and money lol
My interests in Dylan are of a sexual nature so I'm not interested in him singing, dancing, poem writing, exercising, clothed modeling, etc.
lol I've never subbed to him for reasons I won't state here since we now have to be nice and considerate of others life choices and feelings on this forum; but the majority of subs who feel cheated or whatever by his page, are because they expect sex content. They expect sex content because 99.9999999999% of OF pages are sex content (how many of u out there sub to OF for instagram pg-13 quality pages??). My point is that if he clearly articulated at the start of his page "I will show no sex and no sex nudes", people who still sub know exactly what they will not be getting and most likely will not subscribe. Why did Dylan start an OF? Money. Why do most content creators on OF start one? Money. No subs = no money. He never duped me onto his page so I don't feel cheated or mislead.But I don’t think you get it- he doesn’t need to say that he won’t be showing any nudity for it to still hold true. Just because he doesn’t say it doesn’t mean he will or won’t post any.
Now that your expectations have been managed, and now that you know he won’t be showing any of what you need, don’t even bother subscribing. You literally have that option to just not subscribe.
Just stop replying to him and put him on your ignore listlol I've never subbed to him for reasons I won't state here since we now have to be nice and considerate of others life choices and feelings on this forum; but the majority of subs who feel cheated or whatever by his page, are because they expect sex content. They expect sex content because 99.9999999999% of OF pages are sex content (how many of u out there sub to OF for instagram pg-13 quality pages??). My point is that if he clearly articulated at the start of his page "I will show no sex and no sex nudes", people who still sub know exactly what they will not be getting and most likely will not subscribe. Why did Dylan start an OF? Money. Why do most content creators on OF start one? Money. No subs = no money. He never duped me onto his page so I don't feel cheated or mislead.
lol I've never subbed to him for reasons I won't state here since we now have to be nice and considerate of others life choices and feelings on this forum; but the majority of subs who feel cheated or whatever by his page, are because they expect sex content. They expect sex content because 99.9999999999% of OF pages are sex content (how many of u out there sub to OF for instagram pg-13 quality pages??). My point is that if he clearly articulated at the start of his page "I will show no sex and no sex nudes", people who still sub know exactly what they will not be getting and most likely will not subscribe. Why did Dylan start an OF? Money. Why do most content creators on OF start one? Money. No subs = no money. He never duped me onto his page so I don't feel cheated or mislead.
So in other words, they feel they're entitled to sex content, even though he's never promised them sex content. And they're mad because they're not getting what they think they're entitled to, even though they're not entitled to it.... but the majority of subs who feel cheated or whatever by his page, are because they expect sex content. They expect sex content because 99.9999999999% of OF pages are sex content (how many of u out there sub to OF for instagram pg-13 quality pages??).
That’s exactly what I’m saying, you’re very articulate, much more than me. Some miserable, miserable people will never be satisfied with not getting their way.So in other words, they feel they're entitled to sex content, even though he's never promised them sex content. And they're mad because they're not getting what they think they're entitled to, even though they're not entitled to it.
Does anyone have the collab sneak peak he just posted?
Shocker!!!Nope cause he hasn’t posted it yet, on SC he said he was posting it last night but didn’t