LOL, so YOUR own "interpretation" of his description of the video is the right one? Sure, Jan. Just because you are mislead by your own interpretation does not mean it is actually misleading. I read the description (in English) and I knew it wasn't a video of him jerking off and cumming like what the guy you quoted originally said, because that's NOT what the description says. You will only be mislead if English isn't your first language or your brain is clouded by a desperate desire to see what you wanna see.
"This morning I woke up with a really hard cock and I made a video, right after I jerked off, and I imagined a blowjob from you... "
- he woke up hard, he jerked off imagining a blowjob from you, and he made a video right after
"I can't tell you how much cum... I was exploding!”
- he came a lot after he jerked off (which was prior to him making the video because he did not say otherwise)
I didn't see the video myself hence I have no opinion on whether he should have been hard still if he really took the video right after jerking off and cumming, but not all guys can stay hard after cumming - some immediately deflates, so one can argue that he COULD HAVE taken the video a few seconds after cumming and he was already almost completely soft (if that's indeed what you saw in the video).
Now, was the description meant to mislead? In English, perhaps. But if it were written in Italian, then only Italian speakers can really answer whether it was misleading to them or not.
Anyway, I'm over this. Not gonna respond any further. You do you