For foreskin lovers.....

[jb9]

 

[jb9]

 

[Antinooo]

 

[tdnet]

I’m actually circumcised, yet when flaccid I appear as being uncut. Here’s some examples for you to see. I’m a shower and a grower and notice the scar when erected…

 

[Antinooo]

 

[Antinooo]

 

[pjfog_1]

 

[pjfog_1]

Love the foreskin action in this video: ForeskinHotCaffe

 

[Antinooo]

Antonio Horland

 

[Antinooo]

 

[Turjun]

 

[aasdolph]

Happy 1700!

 

[Atarashiya]

I’m actually circumcised, yet when flaccid I appear as being uncut. Here’s some examples for you to see. I’m a shower and a grower and notice the scar when erected…

OMG! How can it be? Such a useless circumcision.

 

[EmeraldAmethyst]

God decreed that His chosen people the Jews, be circumcised for all generations to come. It's a covenant between Him and all Jews.

NO NO NO! First of all, this isn't really the place for religious convo, but if we're going to go there, let's fricking go there! The circumcision of Abraham is NOTHING like the criminal mutilation performed today. The "foreskin" only applied to the skin which hung beyond ["fore"] the glans because the rest of the skin on a newborn is ATTACHED to the glands and is NOT the "fore-skin". It was not until the Greek Olympic Games, when athletes were required to perform in the nude and exposure of the glans (head) from circumcision was considered extremely vulgar, so Hebrew athletes began the practice of skin stretching, enough to guarantee coverage of the glans. But a looney-toon group of pervert rabbis went ape-shit, stupidly believing that this was "undoing" the Covenant (in their minds the covenant was only in the flesh despite God REPEATEDLY saying it was in the heart, not the flesh), and from that point on they whack jobs ordered the total obliteration of, not just the foreskin, but also the prepuce and available loose skin in a sicko attempt to prevent stretching (which, as any circumcised guy who has practiced stretching knows is nonsense). The circumcision performed today is not that of Abraham's Covenant, it is GENITAL MUTILATION and child sexual assault for which the perpetrators should be locked in a prison. If, as an adult, a Hebrew man wants to mutilate his penis beyond FORE-skin circumcision (amputation of the overhang skin only), that's his body/his choice, but to do more beyond this to a BABY who has no say whatsoever deserve criminal punishment - and BTW, it's criminalization is currently in the works by several medical and human rights groups.

 

[circedbychoice]

NO NO NO! First of all, this isn't really the place for religious convo, but if we're going to go there, let's fricking go there! The circumcision of Abraham is NOTHING like the criminal mutilation performed today. The "foreskin" only applied to the skin which hung beyond ["fore"] the glans because the rest of the skin on a newborn is ATTACHED to the glands and is NOT the "fore-skin". It was not until the Greek Olympic Games, when athletes were required to perform in the nude and exposure of the glans (head) from circumcision was considered extremely vulgar, so Hebrew athletes began the practice of skin stretching, enough to guarantee coverage of the glans. But a looney-toon group of pervert rabbis went ape-shit, stupidly believing that this was "undoing" the Covenant (in their minds the covenant was only in the flesh despite God REPEATEDLY saying it was in the heart, not the flesh), and from that point on they whack jobs ordered the total obliteration of, not just the foreskin, but also the prepuce and available loose skin in a sicko attempt to prevent stretching (which, as any circumcised guy who has practiced stretching knows is nonsense). The circumcision performed today is not that of Abraham's Covenant, it is GENITAL MUTILATION and child sexual assault for which the perpetrators should be locked in a prison. If, as an adult, a Hebrew man wants to mutilate his penis beyond FORE-skin circumcision (amputation of the overhang skin only), that's his body/his choice, but to do more beyond this to a BABY who has no say whatsoever deserve criminal punishment - and BTW, it's criminalization is currently in the works by several medical and human rights groups.

NO NO NO! First of all, this isn't really the place for religious convo, but if we're going to go there, let's fricking go there! The circumcision of Abraham is NOTHING like the criminal mutilation performed today. The "foreskin" only applied to the skin which hung beyond ["fore"] the glans because the rest of the skin on a newborn is ATTACHED to the glands and is NOT the "fore-skin". It was not until the Greek Olympic Games, when athletes were required to perform in the nude and exposure of the glans (head) from circumcision was considered extremely vulgar, so Hebrew athletes began the practice of skin stretching, enough to guarantee coverage of the glans. But a looney-toon group of pervert rabbis went ape-shit, stupidly believing that this was "undoing" the Covenant (in their minds the covenant was only in the flesh despite God REPEATEDLY saying it was in the heart, not the flesh), and from that point on they whack jobs ordered the total obliteration of, not just the foreskin, but also the prepuce and available loose skin in a sicko attempt to prevent stretching (which, as any circumcised guy who has practiced stretching knows is nonsense). The circumcision performed today is not that of Abraham's Covenant, it is GENITAL MUTILATION and child sexual assault for which the perpetrators should be locked in a prison. If, as an adult, a Hebrew man wants to mutilate his penis beyond FORE-skin circumcision (amputation of the overhang skin only), that's his body/his choice, but to do more beyond this to a BABY who has no say whatsoever deserve criminal punishment - and BTW, it's criminalization is currently in the works by several medical and human rights groups.

What are you smoking?

 

[dop35]

 

[skinnyshooter]

View media item 14783491

 

[tdnet]

NO NO NO! First of all, this isn't really the place for religious convo, but if we're going to go there, let's fricking go there! The circumcision of Abraham is NOTHING like the criminal mutilation performed today. The "foreskin" only applied to the skin which hung beyond ["fore"] the glans because the rest of the skin on a newborn is ATTACHED to the glands and is NOT the "fore-skin". It was not until the Greek Olympic Games, when athletes were required to perform in the nude and exposure of the glans (head) from circumcision was considered extremely vulgar, so Hebrew athletes began the practice of skin stretching, enough to guarantee coverage of the glans. But a looney-toon group of pervert rabbis went ape-shit, stupidly believing that this was "undoing" the Covenant (in their minds the covenant was only in the flesh despite God REPEATEDLY saying it was in the heart, not the flesh), and from that point on they whack jobs ordered the total obliteration of, not just the foreskin, but also the prepuce and available loose skin in a sicko attempt to prevent stretching (which, as any circumcised guy who has practiced stretching knows is nonsense). The circumcision performed today is not that of Abraham's Covenant, it is GENITAL MUTILATION and child sexual assault for which the perpetrators should be locked in a prison. If, as an adult, a Hebrew man wants to mutilate his penis beyond FORE-skin circumcision (amputation of the overhang skin only), that's his body/his choice, but to do more beyond this to a BABY who has no say whatsoever deserve criminal punishment - and BTW, it's criminalization is currently in the works by several medical and human rights groups.

In history Gentlemen, a small delicate penis with a long foreskin was prized for a man…
Statues depict the marvel of this as being a prize gift for man to being small and uncut - Perhaps over the centuries until today, most men desire to be larger and often being circumcised is due to supposedly penis cleanliness… Either way how we are now, are our endowments are for reproduction and pleasure purposes for our lifetime.

 

[smoothbcn]

 

[smoothbcn]