Gay sex scenes from movies/tv series

Fellow Travelers is a TOTAL BUMMER.. SORRY Disappointed much. I never got turned on with any of their sex scenes, considering I was eagerly anticipating hot love scenes between these gorgeous actors, Matt Bomer and Jonathan Bailey! These gay movie directors need to learn a thing or two with directing gay sex scenes -- it's not all about buttsex and wild exhibitions for fucksake! Not everyone only looks forward to that, some want intimacy. Look at these missionary body-locked romancing between Hugo Catalan and Mauricio Rico.. and so forth! For someone who expects intimate romance with chemistry and a fan of frottage, Fellow Travelers is a total bummer7ut3tm.gif
a0.gif


You can do all the wild exhibitions simulating buttsex but we all now that ain't inserted and happening in real life. At least, if you put them in missionary position, humping, looking at each other eye-to-eye, you know they feel their dicks and balls touching and rubbing against each other, their abs, chest and torso are pressed against each other.. that's chemistry right there, not these fakesex.20231218_234549.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ofnelxo
Pretty boys with taught muscular bodies in period tank tops, when a movie is Gay without being Gay! For those of you who came of age and had your sexual awaking watching Chariots of Fire, this is the 21st century version:

 
Pretty boys with taught muscular bodies in period tank tops, when a movie is Gay without being Gay! For those of you who came of age and had your sexual awaking watching Chariots of Fire, this is the 21st century version:

I thought this was a thread about gay sex scenes, not mild homoeroticism...
 
Fellow Travelers is a TOTAL BUMMER.. SORRY Disappointed much. I never got turned on with any of their sex scenes, considering I was eagerly anticipating hot love scenes between these gorgeous actors, Matt Bomer and Jonathan Bailey! These gay movie directors need to learn a thing or two with directing gay sex scenes -- it's not all about buttsex and wild exhibitions for fucksake! Not everyone only looks forward to that, some want intimacy. Look at these missionary body-locked romancing between Hugo Catalan and Mauricio Rico.. and so forth! For someone who expects intimate romance with chemistry and a fan of frottage, Fellow Travelers is a total bummerView attachment 116438731View attachment 116438651

You can do all the wild exhibitions simulating buttsex but we all now that ain't inserted and happening in real life. At least, if you put them in missionary position, humping, looking at each other eye-to-eye, you know they feel their dicks and balls touching and rubbing against each other, their abs, chest and torso are pressed against each other.. that's chemistry right there, not these fakesex.View attachment 116438561
i absolutely agree the icing on the cake was the bad threesome where skippy was forced to
 
Gay filmmakers try so hard to be realistic with their scenes, but like, movies SHOULD be romanticized. Straight sex scenes are romanticized to be more pleasant and fun to watch, we don't need some hyper-realistic position. We need it to look good on screen and entertaining to watch. If I wanted realistic, I'd go watch porn.
 
Gay filmmakers try so hard to be realistic with their scenes, but like, movies SHOULD be romanticized. Straight sex scenes are romanticized to be more pleasant and fun to watch, we don't need some hyper-realistic position. We need it to look good on screen and entertaining to watch. If I wanted realistic, I'd go watch porn.
its like that in showtime shows. They try to make it realistic. Also HBO.
 
Gay filmmakers try so hard to be realistic with their scenes, but like, movies SHOULD be romanticized. Straight sex scenes are romanticized to be more pleasant and fun to watch, we don't need some hyper-realistic position. We need it to look good on screen and entertaining to watch. If I wanted realistic, I'd go watch porn.
What straight sex scenes? Mainstream movies basically don’t show sex any more.

I agree sex scenes can benefit from being heightened or romanticized, but personally I’m always taken out of the story by a sex scene where the mechanics don’t work (cough cough White Lotus rimming scene), honestly more than if it’s just not sexy enough.

Also I think people on this site have a bias towards wanting everything to be eroticized, it comes with the territory, but the reality is that not every sex scene is meant to turn you on.
 
Gay filmmakers try so hard to be realistic with their scenes, but like, movies SHOULD be romanticized. Straight sex scenes are romanticized to be more pleasant and fun to watch, we don't need some hyper-realistic position. We need it to look good on screen and entertaining to watch. If I wanted realistic, I'd go watch porn.
Realistic where?? Literally 90% of gay sex scenes don't involve the penises at all and the actors cum in under a minute without ever touching their dicks. Not realistic in the slightest. Also rarely ever rimming or even oral. They literally usually make out, kiss down the chest and then straight to penetration lol.