You've digressed, terribly. I just wanna ask straight men how far they might go, if they might ever cross that frontier at all, and under what circumstances. You've given your answer and stated more than your piece.
Heteroflexible for Gay Couple?
- Thread starter gaydude45
- Start date
That’s the thing dude. A straight dude’s line is pretty clear.
Allows us to have that.
Allows us to have that.
Perhaps, but sometimes things happen. I suppose I should also ask what things straight men have other done with men, even if they now consider themselves 100% heterosexual.
Interesting logic; if they have ever tried a man, they're gay. Seems a fait accompli.
I meant for you to clarify, not copy and paste. Anyway, without clarification I am compelled to take your fait accompli logic (as I put it), that straight is straight and gay is gay. I don't think it's so clear. It seems you don't wish to be part of this conversation, and yet here you are. No one is being attacked here, so I'm not sure what your gambit is.
Anyway, some straight men have experimented. It doesn't make them gay; it may not even make them bi. This thread is for open discussion on the subject. You feel very strongly on the subject, which is your prerogative. However, I'm not sure why you voraciously defend your position with:
Anyway, some straight men have experimented. It doesn't make them gay; it may not even make them bi. This thread is for open discussion on the subject. You feel very strongly on the subject, which is your prerogative. However, I'm not sure why you voraciously defend your position with:
That is a direct quote, without subtraction, translation, alternative comprehension, or unmerited explication. My intention is not to debate, but to inquire. You and some others however wish to. No one asked you to do that. And what points? For whom, and in what cause? I'm a private party here just exploring a thought I have long had, one that's alluring for many gay men. It's not a crime, and it's not hateful.
Yes, that is a direct quote. I don’t know what confuses you about it. Having sex with men means they are not straight. They are bi or gay. If someone wants to call themselves straight despite hooking with other men, good for them. If they need to believe that label applies to them because of oppression or repression or just to deal with the thoughts in their head, so be it.
Your fantasy attempts to discredit the existence of men that do not want to have sex with men. I’m not personally offended by it, but your refusing to accept others sexual preferences is problematic.
Your fantasy attempts to discredit the existence of men that do not want to have sex with men. I’m not personally offended by it, but your refusing to accept others sexual preferences is problematic.
Fantasies discredit nothing, because they don't have real form. If you feel they do, oh well.
Not every straight man has his whole life figured out, much less do many other people who are not best equipped with self-awareness or direction. Much like your disclaim to offense, despite stating that my, "refusing to accept others sexual preferences is problematic". Never did that.
Also, you're on a Message Board that is dedicated to penises and men's sexuality; it is rife with gay and bicurious men. It would serve you better to be more perceptive to open-ended discussion such as this, as opposed to your polemical approach that has digressed this topic from its original point. If that's not your thing, then you don't have to participate. No one is forcing you to reply to my thread.
Have a lovely weekend.
Jesus dude, you are spiraling. I am completely open to discussion. But your entire premise is based on straight men being imaginary creatures.
Male sexuality does not equal male sex. Surely you know that. Bi, gay, or straight, we can all discuss commonalities or curiosities that are not at all related to man on man sex.
How open-ended can a conversation be if you refuse to accept that a person with 0 interest in sex with a man isn’t interested in sex with a man?
Male sexuality does not equal male sex. Surely you know that. Bi, gay, or straight, we can all discuss commonalities or curiosities that are not at all related to man on man sex.
How open-ended can a conversation be if you refuse to accept that a person with 0 interest in sex with a man isn’t interested in sex with a man?
So much for that open discussion you pontificated about.
Good bye, next.
Good bye, next.
Apology accepted. Thanks for participating in the discussion. Have a good weekend.
Sorry for any douchiness on my part. Cheers.
notthatguy
Superior Member
Hmm, I am intrigued. Would you care to further elaborate on this relationship?
Similar threads
