How common are 11 inch cocks?

[ItsAll4Kim]

Do you have the photograph? Can you re-upload it so we can examine it in more detail.

You couldn't bother finding your copies, so I did it for you.

Explain why the top of the ruler has a shadow nearly half an inch past the ruler, the hand and his legs all cast the exact same well-defined shadows, yet the tip of his penis casts no shadow at all.

Better still, let's here it directly from the man who took the picture.

Here is an invert of his dick...

View attachment 705267

 

[unclep]

like how much in the population?

There are definitely none in the White House or its' staff !!

 

[TinyPrincess]

I have called out fakes in the past but this guy is not faking.

So the shadow just disappeared by divine intervention?

What is it going to take for you to change your mind?

He could come clean and we could move on. Wouldn't change my mind though. Faking is faking...

 

[TinyPrincess]

I have been treading very carefully with every post I have written to make sure I haven't broken the ToS.

LMAO - so outright calling me "a man" three times on your first day here is "treading very carefully". Oh, boy...

 

[goldzilla]

You couldn't bother finding your copies, so I did it for you.

Explain why the top of the ruler has a shadow nearly half an inch past the ruler, the hand and his legs all cast the exact same well-defined shadows, yet the tip of his penis casts no shadow at all.

Better still, let's here it directly from the man who took the picture.



View attachment 791568

View attachment 791571

I don't know nobody does. But the lack of a single shadow does not mean fraud, we do not know what the light conditions of the room were or where the light source/s were coming from. In this case the lack of shadow in that specific area it looks like because of the angle the photograph was taken but this makes no different at all to the measurement. It is not possible to take a photograph while holding a camera and obtain a totally level photograph.

Have a look at sdp's measurement/s:

Measurement 1:

There is no shadow on his penis tip.

This is more clear in his other measurement:

Hey guess what? There is no shadow on this penis.

Let's all call sdp a fraud now!! It is only fair right by your own logic. No shadow on the tip of penis = fraud. So sdp ... fraud !!

 

[goldzilla]

LMAO - so outright calling me "a man" three times on your first day here is "treading very carefully". Oh, boy...

I have been called things much worse in this thread. I wouldn't be worried about getting called a man. It is not the worst insult out there.

 

[TinyPrincess]

I have been called things much worse in this thread. I wouldn't be worried about getting called a man. It is not the worst insult out there.

Perhaps not for a man

But I get your point. My favourite insult was being called a racist and white because I answered Shane Diesel on a question on "name your favourite dick on a porn actor". So I was white and racist for preferring a black cock???

 

[TinyPrincess]

I don't know nobody does. But the lack of a single shadow does not mean fraud, we do not know what the light conditions of the room were or where the light source/s were coming from. In this case the lack of shadow in that specific area it looks like because of the angle the photograph was taken but this makes no different at all to the measurement. It is not possible to take a photograph while holding a camera and obtain a totally level photograph.

Have a look at sdp's measurement/s:

Measurement 1:

View attachment 791659

View attachment 791657

There is no shadow on his penis tip.

This is more clear in his other measurement:

View attachment 791660

View attachment 791661


Hey guess what? There is no shadow on this penis.

Let's all call sdp a fraud now!! It is only fair right by your own logic. No shadow on the tip of penis = fraud. So sdp ... fraud !!

Nice attempt but very different from the very hard (massive even) shadows on MrHuge1 - well except his dick...

Close but no cigar...

 

[goldzilla]

Perhaps not for a man

But I get your point. My favourite insult was being called a racist and white because I answered Shane Diesel on a question on "name your favourite dick on a porn actor". So I was white and racist for preferring a black cock???

I am very disappointed TinyPrincess. I was hoping you preferred white cock. You could have been my future girlfriend

 

[Sevensix]

And...here...we...go...

 

[goldzilla]

btw just to clarify so I do not get attacked. I do not believe sdp is a fraud. All his measurements were not edited or faked. I was merely trying to show something. Just because a shadow may be missing from underneath the dick it doesn't mean the photograph is automatically fake.

 

[goldzilla]

Thick13sc has 13 inches, the search is over.

 

[Sevensix]

SMH...

 

[Shepardson]

Shepardson can you upload a genuine measurement? Do you accept genuine measurements exist?

Yes, but it is quite apparent to anyone with internet access and common sense that they are completely washed out by the number of "LPSG" measurement pictures, and as I've said, when you get past a certain size range, they get rare as hen's teeth because everyone needs to live up to the bullshit numbers we associate with huge dicks. I have indeed seen a couple 90° standing ruler shots which were still up in that range, but I can't point you to any specific one and they show up very infrequently. You yourself may even have posted one, but I don't save (or remember) everything. They also most likely were not reaching the sort of numbers the top tier angledicks are known for, but ironically may have been larger in real inches.

Every technique you insist is still valid and doesn't "add anything" has been explained in detail too many times, often with pictures. If it really didn't matter, it wouldn't show up as much as it does, and you'd have no problem getting any one of them to do a simple clear measurement. Would you accept someone's height measurement in a photo which was taken from a tree branch three feet over their head and hanging two feet in front of where they were standing? The problems are obvious and we all know it just doesn't work that way. How accurate is a dick measurement taken from the bottom of the guy's shaft while laying down with his dick flat on his gut? Who the hell knows. How far down is he allowed to start measuring? His balls? His ass? How different is that really from the flipside scenario with the guy leaning back or angling his dick forward?

 

[Snakebyte]

A clear picture of a legit measurement was already posted in this thread. But the trolls just ignored it because then it would be obvious how stupid their claims are.

 

[goldzilla]

That lovely ignore button

 

[goldzilla]

Yes, but it is quite apparent to anyone with internet access and common sense that they are completely washed out by the number of "LPSG" measurement pictures, and as I've said, when you get past a certain size range, they get rare as hen's teeth because everyone needs to live up to the bullshit numbers we associate with huge dicks. I have indeed seen a couple 90° standing ruler shots which were still up in that range, but I can't point you to any specific one and they show up very infrequently. You yourself may even have posted one, but I don't save (or remember) everything. They also most likely were not reaching the sort of numbers the top tier angledicks are known for, but ironically may have been larger in real inches.

Every technique you insist is still valid and doesn't "add anything" has been explained in detail too many times, often with pictures. If it really didn't matter, it wouldn't show up as much as it does, and you'd have no problem getting any one of them to do a simple clear measurement. Would you accept someone's height measurement in a photo which was taken from a tree branch three feet over their head and hanging two feet in front of where they were standing? The problems are obvious and we all know it just doesn't work that way. How accurate is a dick measurement taken from the bottom of the guy's shaft while laying down with his dick flat on his gut? Who the hell knows. How far down is he allowed to start measuring? His balls? His ass? How different is that really from the flipside scenario with the guy leaning back or angling his dick forward?

This is an entirely accurate one.

 

[Nosuportneeded]

btw just to clarify so I do not get attacked. I do not believe sdp is a fraud. All his measurements were not edited or faked. I was merely trying to show something. Just because a shadow may be missing from underneath the dick it doesn't mean the photograph is automatically fake.

I don't know nobody does. But the lack of a single shadow does not mean fraud, we do not know what the light conditions of the room were or where the light source/s were coming from. In this case the lack of shadow in that specific area it looks like because of the angle the photograph was taken but this makes no different at all to the measurement. It is not possible to take a photograph while holding a camera and obtain a totally level photograph.

Have a look at sdp's measurement/s:

Measurement 1:

View attachment 791659

View attachment 791657

There is no shadow on his penis tip.

This is more clear in his other measurement:

View attachment 791660

View attachment 791661


Hey guess what? There is no shadow on this penis.

Let's all call sdp a fraud now!! It is only fair right by your own logic. No shadow on the tip of penis = fraud. So sdp ... fraud !!

Gotta say, in the first photo of sdp that you posted the shadows are angled a bit. The shadow of his forefinger is just under his penis tip, and the shadow of his penis tip would be just under the ruler, barely out of view. The other photo has no significant shadows.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

I don't know nobody does. But the lack of a single shadow does not mean fraud, we do not know what the light conditions of the room were or where the light source/s were coming from. In this case the lack of shadow in that specific area it looks like because of the angle the photograph was taken but this makes no different at all to the measurement. It is not possible to take a photograph while holding a camera and obtain a totally level photograph.

Have a look at sdp's measurement/s:

Measurement 1:

View attachment 791659

View attachment 791657

There is no shadow on his penis tip.

This is more clear in his other measurement:

View attachment 791660

View attachment 791661


Hey guess what? There is no shadow on this penis.

Let's all call sdp a fraud now!! It is only fair right by your own logic. No shadow on the tip of penis = fraud. So sdp ... fraud !!

Nobody...not one other member....is attempting to defend the shadow picture. Even the guy who posted it. There are good reasons...it's indefensible.

SDP's picture is lit from the opposite side from MrHuge1n's. This is clearly why the shadow cast by the tip of his penis isn't visible, but you are obviously trying to ignore this in your attempt to stir up some hyperbolic rhetoric.

SDP's picture is lit from the left side of his penis. How far left is evident by where the shadow begins at the end of the ruler. The shadow made by the tip of his penis is blocked from view by the ruler.

MrHuge1n's picture is illuminated just slightly to the right side of his penis. Again, looking at the end of the ruler we can see how far. There should be a shadow at the end of his penis....and that shadow would not be blocked, as no other object is there to hide it, AND there should be a shadow at the left edge. There are bits of it, but it should be consistently visible as is every other shadow in the photo.

The phony watermark hides the real issue, where the inch was added. The left edge is curiously contoured right where the top and bottom edges of the watermark cross it. Curious, because no other part of his cock has any noticeable bumpiness. But mostly very problematic because the shadow doesn't follow the profile of the left side, and is nonexistent at the top-left.

 

[TinyPrincess]

I am very disappointed TinyPrincess. I was hoping you preferred white cock. You could have been my future girlfriend

I prefer large cocks - no matter which colour, race or breed.

And I pick my boyfriends, fuckbuddies and one-nighters solely on their personality - not their cocksize or colour.