i didnt tell u were attacking me...i said that to oxnard i was just trying to explain to you that it is almost imposible for non medical people to get medical studies, u can just get quotes of it in medical journals thats all, and i know very well because my fiancee works in medical field, thats all i was trying to tell you,,,,
u have learned to be suspicious or a pain in the arse?Yeah, the first one involved what looked like credible medical information, but it also mentioned a few nice nutrients as the only medical benefit. The listed nutrients did not look like anything you shouldn't already be getting in your diet, and there was no indication as to whether or not the quantity was sufficient as per Fade's observation. We are talking about a mere teaspoon of liquid, after all, and the nutritional value is probably coming from the sperm cells themselves, which is only a fraction of the liquid.
The depression claim from the Albany study was addressed in the Psychology Today link I posted.
Sorry. I don't mean to come down on you or anything, it's just that I like to be persnickety about science claims and health claims. As a liberal, I get tons of specious health claims from other liberals, and I've learned to be suspicious.
Right, but the thing to remember is that one should never form an opinion based on a single study. Most published studies end up being wrong. The important thing is the consensus opinion of the researches who read all the studies on a given topic, and unfortunately, science reporters never seem to mention that.
Yes, and thank you very much for posting all of those links, however from what I read, I do not see a reason to support any conclusion about health benefits from ingesting sperm, but I did see evidence that sex in general has psychological and emotional benefits.
maybe i should had posted this tread in ask a woman....not in woman issues because basically i was asking on her opinion too.
Yes, thank you for citing links. I wish more people did that. I think I already mentioned what I thought about the links, so no need to go over that again.
Both.u have learned to be suspicious or a pain in the arse?
End of story, I would say (Both.
Honestly, I'm still not suspicious enough of information I get on the Internet. Sometimes I will share things on my Facebook feed that turn out to be debunked by Snopes, for example. And yes, I'm an ass; a bombastic, opinionated ass.
End of the story?....u see i didnt believe u hahahaah
i forgot to make my wishes untill now....i will start counting since nowit's a test of dedication and determination
Usually you can see the abstract or excerpts from the abstract for free. Sometimes you can see excerpts from the conclusion. What you can almost always see is a link to the article, that when you click on it, you are prompted to enter your credentials to see the journal in which the paper is published. Usually you can find these, and other scholarly forms of information through Google Scholar, or through a university library Web interface. I think what you are now being asked to do is show where you see references to the studies you say were cited, which is a reasonable request.
It's very frustrating. In many cases, we taxpayers paid for that research to be done in the first place, so why should we have to pay even more money to access the results of that research?
I think there is a bit of psychology behind men liking that. I can't speak for other men, but personally I find it embarrassing that my own pleasure produces such a mess. It tastes bad, it gets everything sticky, and it causes pregnancy. Swallowing counters some of those negative feelings.
