Hunks with small cocks

It is a tattoo. I've seen pics of him where he is much older. He is more of a grower and not a shower. His cock is about average in size. He's still pretty hot in my opinion.

Hot for sure, but walking around with SLAVE inked above your willy on you perfect chiseled body?

Okay, his choice... I hope he was in sound mind when he let it it inked.
 
Hot for sure, but walking around with SLAVE inked above your willy on you perfect chiseled body?

Okay, his choice... I hope he was in sound mind when he let it it inked.
Usually they are not of sound mind when they get that crazy shit done!
 
The conclusion one can draw from these pics and vids is that an overwhelming percentage of guys with small cocks are uncut. Perhaps this is a good argument for circumcision. Science should definitely look into this.

I'm hung like a chipmunk and cut. Why did I get screwed? Per the evidence of all the small uncut guys shown, I shoulda been spared a small willy.
 
Poor quality. Apologies but this guy has a super bod and a very small willy:
Looks a lot like mine, except uncut. And I got way bigger balls.

To those who've said you can't judge from a soft cock what it'll be hard, per The Visualiser mine grows 667%. Still small, though.

Great thread! It proves that a lot of us small guys can be hot as hell!
 
The conclusion one can draw from these pics and vids is that an overwhelming percentage of guys with small cocks are uncut. Perhaps this is a good argument for circumcision. Science should definitely look into this.

I'm hung like a chipmunk and cut. Why did I get screwed? Per the evidence of all the small uncut guys shown, I shoulda been spared a small willy.
You might want to draw that conclusion, but it's a faulty one. Cock size is determined by genetics. Two-thirds of the males on the planet are uncut. So the majority of small cocks will be uncut.
None of these threads are scientific polls. A lot of photoshopping is done on the big dick as well as the small dick threads.
 
The conclusion one can draw from these pics and vids is that an overwhelming percentage of guys with small cocks are uncut. Perhaps this is a good argument for circumcision. Science should definitely look into this.

I'm hung like a chipmunk and cut. Why did I get screwed? Per the evidence of all the small uncut guys shown, I shoulda been spared a small willy.

I have seen plenty of non-erect cut cocks and there was zero difference in size with non-erect uncut cocks. As you can see with all the porn from French, British, Spanish, Czech, German, Brazilean, African etc. dudes, there are lots of mighty big and impressive uncut cocks.
 
You might want to draw that conclusion, but it's a faulty one. Cock size is determined by genetics. Two-thirds of the males on the planet are uncut. So the majority of small cocks will be uncut.
None of these threads are scientific polls. A lot of photoshopping is done on the big dick as well as the small dick threads.
I have seen plenty of non-erect cut cocks and there was zero difference in size with non-erect uncut cocks. As you can see with all the porn from French, British, Spanish, Czech, German, Brazilean, African etc. dudes, there are lots of mighty big and impressive uncut cocks.
Hmmm. . . I knew I shoulda thrown in a smiley face or two. :D To paraphrase George S Kaufman, "satire is what closes on Saturday night" because it too often goes over the heads of the audience. People will take me at my word.

I'm aware that there's probably no difference in size between the cut and the uncut. Circumcision is a matter of cultural choice and/or medical decision. I was simply pointing out that lex22 in this fantastic thread had almost exclusively focused on small uncut cocks. Was this a matter of personal preference? Did he only select from European sites where uncut might be the norm? Did he actually believe small flaccid cocks were more often uncut? Or was this a Machiavellian attempt to smear the uncut by showing the dangers of not being circumcised? *

Whatever. There certainly was a paucity of small cut cocks. I felt left out.**


* :D
** :cool: Left is an anagram of felt. I'm so mixed up.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: botrock
Hmmm. . . I knew I shoulda thrown in a smiley face or two. :D To paraphrase George S Kaufman, "satire is what closes on Saturday night" because it too often goes over the heads of the audience. People will take me at my word.

I'm aware that there's probably no difference in size between the cut and the uncut. Circumcision is a matter of cultural choice and/or medical decision. I was simply pointing out that lex22 in this fantastic thread had almost exclusively focused on small uncut cocks. Was this a matter of personal preference? Did he only select from European sites where uncut might be the norm? Did he actually believe small flaccid cocks were more often uncut? Or was this a Machiavellian attempt to smear the uncut by showing the dangers of not being circumcised? *

Whatever. There certainly was a paucity of small cut cocks. I felt left out.**


* :D
** :cool: Left is an anagram of felt. I'm so mixed up.

No attempt to smear uncut cocks at all. Not sure how being uncut/cut determines penis size as this is genetic.
My personal preference is a man with an uncut cock as this is the way nature intended, however I find many cut men attractive too.
Please feel free to upload some hot guys with small cut cocks to provide some balance - would love to see it :)