Hyperspermia

[Acratopotes]

Yes, People think that hyperspermia is about he volume.... but it it really is about the sensitivity and quick release. Sebastian Coxx is a great example of hyperspermia.

Everything I have seen defines hyperspermia by volume.

On the other hand I have also read the theory that the walls of the seminal vesicles contain stretch receptors that feed back to the brain how full they are, a bit like how the bladder does. For anyone who doesn't know, there is a pair of seminal vesicles and, along with the prostate, they contribute most of the liquid part to our semen. Then, this theory maintains that, just like the fuller the bladder is the more urgently we feel a need to piss, so the fuller the seminal vesicles the more urgently we feel the need to cum and the less stimulation we need to make it happen.

 

[nottohide]

okay, bro. If you think that the bladder and prostate have the same function and are the same size... then continue to enjoy the fuckery

Nobody said they have the same function or size...

 

[nottohide]

The conversation was about the rediculous and outrageous volume of cum. No doctor will cosign that....lol

You said "people think it is about the volume", not "people think it is cumming unnaturally large".

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

Look Everything I have seen defines hyperspermia by volume.

On the other hand I have also read the theory that the walls of the seminal vesicles contain stretch receptors that feed back to the brain how full they are, a bit like how the bladder does. For anyone who doesn't know, there is a pair of seminal vesicles and, along with the prostate, they contribute most of the liquid part to our semen. Then, this theory maintains that, just like the fuller the bladder is the more urgently we feel a need to piss, so the fuller the seminal vesicles the more urgently we feel the need to cum and the less stimulation we need to make it happen.

As a man with it

Everything I have seen defines hyperspermia by volume.

On the other hand I have also read the theory that the walls of the seminal vesicles contain stretch receptors that feed back to the brain how full they are, a bit like how the bladder does. For anyone who doesn't know, there is a pair of seminal vesicles and, along with the prostate, they contribute most of the liquid part to our semen. Then, this theory maintains that, just like the fuller the bladder is the more urgently we feel a need to piss, so the fuller the seminal vesicles the more urgently we feel the need to cum and the less stimulation we need to make it happen.

Personally I do get very sensitive at times among other things amount is thd main thing, it’s how you identify it from other stuff.

It says it in the name which translates to some form of high semen abnormality

I don’t understand why we’re trying to change the definition, high volume is the main thing. It’s like trying to define having a cold as having a sore nose.

A more believable cause from what I seen is an overproduction of some hormones, which is why you can get it tested that way

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

Yeah...I have to agree.... what's the point of it.... who knows.
Real Hyperspermia is not about the volume....it's about the frequency. So basically, they are just sharpshooters who do it quickly and often.... not these exaggeration monstrosities

Hyperspermia can be a LOT the problem is there’s many Injectors who’ll claim they are real and people belive them, mainly guys shoved never seen another dude cum, it’s not litres and litres

 

[Cum_is_Great]

Hey, so genuinely as one of the guys who started and founded the subreddit for Hyperspermia, I really wish I had set my foot down to distinguish things.

So here's the genuine real truth as to why there is a mixup.

Hyperspermia is a clinical condition in regards to seminal fluid in an ejaculation after abstaining for 3 days. This is what it literally was defined as, medically and clinically. And that's because from decades of fertility researching, the well known average ejaculation volume was 2 to 5 ml.

Hyperspermia is supposed to be when you have an ejaculation volume of over a certain ml, which varied but usually started with about 6.5ml, yes they defined it even when abstaining because these conditions are in relation to fertility testing.

Now, men who ejaculate volumes that are extremely excessive. That's something different. But there is no medical defintion or condition. Remember, Hyperspermia is in relation to average seminal volume and fertility only so far. I genuinely would love to know more. I would even go back to college to research it if I weren't literally dirt poor and burdened.

Its hard to explain but I believe there might be some people who have volumes in the extreme but they literally are the rarest of the rare. They dont know it but they are like the massive dick guys here who genuinely think "they arent THAT big." Or they say 'well someone else must be bigger.'

But to compare, its standard deviations. Let's compare hyperspermia to "tall"

Someone who is 6ft 6 or I think 200cm is definitely tall.

Someone who ejaculates 10ml definitely has hyperspermia.

Someone who is 9ft 10 or I think 300cm is tall sure. But is that really what that is? Is that what people think of when they think tall? Is that normal to get that tall? Is that the same "condition" as the 6ft6 200cm tall guy?

Someone who ejaculates 50ml definitely has hyperspermia. But is it really just hyperspermia? Is there something underlying causing such an extreme outlier?


You can look up scientific research papers in realtion to Hyperspermia. I will admit I havent looked into it for quite a few years now. If science and research has caught up and released some more info, I am 150% all ears! I think there is an unknown or undiagnosed condition for those who have the very extreme excessive volumes.

(Note I said 50ml, which is QUITE a lot but not the volumes like that hugeloads guy and others like him. Again, if there really truly guys out there who can ejaculate liters at a time, they genuinely need to see a doctor immediately. There needs research, it could be the cure for infertility for other men. If your DNA or genes have something identifiable and can be reproduced to help others, it would be amazing! I'm not being hyperbolic.)

 

[Cum_is_Great]

I also have this curiosity to know if younger guys are making more semen. Most fertility testing and research was done over the years but never before have humams had the ability to have such graphic sexual content all the time any time easily.

Its possible that way more frequently ejaculating and such have caused their bodies to produce more, therefore making the average go up and therefore making more "infighting"(not even entertaining the liters amount that some vehemently define it as) about what volume levels are true hyperspermia. I haven't heard or looked into anything about fertility levels for today's 20 year olds.

Also I hope all that is coherent. I haven't been in a good headspace and also not fully sober.

 

[LuvdickXOXO]

Hey, so genuinely as one of the guys who started and founded the subreddit for Hyperspermia, I really wish I had set my foot down to distinguish things.

So here's the genuine real truth as to why there is a mixup.

Hyperspermia is a clinical condition in regards to seminal fluid in an ejaculation after abstaining for 3 days. This is what it literally was defined as, medically and clinically. And that's because from decades of fertility researching, the well known average ejaculation volume was 2 to 5 ml.

Hyperspermia is supposed to be when you have an ejaculation volume of over a certain ml, which varied but usually started with about 6.5ml, yes they defined it even when abstaining because these conditions are in relation to fertility testing.

Now, men who ejaculate volumes that are extremely excessive. That's something different. But there is no medical defintion or condition. Remember, Hyperspermia is in relation to average seminal volume and fertility only so far. I genuinely would love to know more. I would even go back to college to research it if I weren't literally dirt poor and burdened.

Its hard to explain but I believe there might be some people who have volumes in the extreme but they literally are the rarest of the rare. They dont know it but they are like the massive dick guys here who genuinely think "they arent THAT big." Or they say 'well someone else must be bigger.'

But to compare, its standard deviations. Let's compare hyperspermia to "tall"

Someone who is 6ft 6 or I think 200cm is definitely tall.

Someone who ejaculates 10ml definitely has hyperspermia.

Someone who is 9ft 10 or I think 300cm is tall sure. But is that really what that is? Is that what people think of when they think tall? Is that normal to get that tall? Is that the same "condition" as the 6ft6 200cm tall guy?

Someone who ejaculates 50ml definitely has hyperspermia. But is it really just hyperspermia? Is there something underlying causing such an extreme outlier?


You can look up scientific research papers in realtion to Hyperspermia. I will admit I havent looked into it for quite a few years now. If science and research has caught up and released some more info, I am 150% all ears! I think there is an unknown or undiagnosed condition for those who have the very extreme excessive volumes.

(Note I said 50ml, which is QUITE a lot but not the volumes like that hugeloads guy and others like him. Again, if there really truly guys out there who can ejaculate liters at a time, they genuinely need to see a doctor immediately. There needs research, it could be the cure for infertility for other men. If your DNA or genes have something identifiable and can be reproduced to help others, it would be amazing! I'm not being hyperbolic.)

well said

 

[Acratopotes]

Hyperspermia is a clinical condition in regards to seminal fluid in an ejaculation after abstaining for 3 days. This is what it literally was defined as, medically and clinically. And that's because from decades of fertility researching, the well known average ejaculation volume was 2 to 5 ml.

Thanks for confirming that the clinical diagnosis is based on volume.

You mentioned in a later post that wonder if the average had increased over the years. Another thing that occurs to me is that the people seen by fertility clinics are people where the couple are experiencing fertility problems. That doesn't necessarily mean there is any issue with the man and the clinics may see enough men for which the other parameters are completely normal that simply averaging the volume across those they see would yield a perfectly good result. But, if someone is proclaiming "This is the average, determined by medics in a proper lab" I would hope there had been some effort to make sure it was a good cross section of the population, not just the people who submitted samples in connection with fertility.

I also wonder what the purpose is of identifying this as a condition and giving it a name. I have read that it can be associated with infertility, but that doesn't seem to be a foregone conclusion. What practical effect does it have on a man's life to be told he has hyperspermia?

I also like your how you compare this to being tall vs. being a giant. I think it is worth noting, though, that even the largest giants have not been ten times the height of a normal person. With liquid, we're very bad at estimating volume when it isn't together in one place, but I think 50ml would be a very impressive ejaculation, visually. If someone claims to be producing 500ml or more it seems having put something in their bladder which they are then pissing out is a much more likely explanation than having a prostate gland or seminal vesicles able to produce that much.

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

Hey, so genuinely as one of the guys who started and founded the subreddit for Hyperspermia, I really wish I had set my foot down to distinguish things.

So here's the genuine real truth as to why there is a mixup.

Hyperspermia is a clinical condition in regards to seminal fluid in an ejaculation after abstaining for 3 days. This is what it literally was defined as, medically and clinically. And that's because from decades of fertility researching, the well known average ejaculation volume was 2 to 5 ml.

Hyperspermia is supposed to be when you have an ejaculation volume of over a certain ml, which varied but usually started with about 6.5ml, yes they defined it even when abstaining because these conditions are in relation to fertility testing.

Now, men who ejaculate volumes that are extremely excessive. That's something different. But there is no medical defintion or condition. Remember, Hyperspermia is in relation to average seminal volume and fertility only so far. I genuinely would love to know more. I would even go back to college to research it if I weren't literally dirt poor and burdened.

Its hard to explain but I believe there might be some people who have volumes in the extreme but they literally are the rarest of the rare. They dont know it but they are like the massive dick guys here who genuinely think "they arent THAT big." Or they say 'well someone else must be bigger.'

But to compare, its standard deviations. Let's compare hyperspermia to "tall"

Someone who is 6ft 6 or I think 200cm is definitely tall.

Someone who ejaculates 10ml definitely has hyperspermia.

Someone who is 9ft 10 or I think 300cm is tall sure. But is that really what that is? Is that what people think of when they think tall? Is that normal to get that tall? Is that the same "condition" as the 6ft6 200cm tall guy?

Someone who ejaculates 50ml definitely has hyperspermia. But is it really just hyperspermia? Is there something underlying causing such an extreme outlier?


You can look up scientific research papers in realtion to Hyperspermia. I will admit I havent looked into it for quite a few years now. If science and research has caught up and released some more info, I am 150% all ears! I think there is an unknown or undiagnosed condition for those who have the very extreme excessive volumes.

(Note I said 50ml, which is QUITE a lot but not the volumes like that hugeloads guy and others like him. Again, if they’re really truly guys out there who can ejaculate liters at a time, they genuinely need to see a doctor immediately. There needs research, it could be the cure for infertility for other men. If your DNA or genes have something identifiable and can be reproduced to help others, it would be amazing! I'm not being hyperbolic.)

I think something people need to bear in mind is that hyperspermia is often a symptom of something and not a condition on its own, some guys have it genetically yeah but apparently prostate infections and other such stuff or even abstaining for some men can induce hyperspermia.

So if somebody is apparently making 50ml (Personally I call bullshit till I see proof in a controlled environment due to how easy injecting can be) they should get it investigated because there is DEFINATELY something else going on there, especially if it started rather recently in their life.


Me personally I’ve said in hyperspermia circles before, I only really noticed I was really different when I started seeing other men and seeing it for myself, straight guys probably are not looking at other men nutting enough to Atleast by visuals see they are nutting more.

I’m not saying women can’t detect it either it’s just us guys know our own bodies.

And even then I find there’s a big difference in visuals in those not at the top end of the condition where it’s really obvious, as said on the sub range doesn’t equel volume but it certainly makes it look big, it’s fully possible that there’s a lot of guys who have it but just deny it because 1 they don’t see other men cum enough or 2. They’re constantly being compared to the very top end who rise to the top of that sub, and especially since anythi Ny below that is just said to not be hyperspermia.

I love the subreddit, posted a few times too, I wish there was more discussion and research but alas no scientist is going to spend the bucks on research just to satisfy a bunch of dudes who want to know if they cum a lot

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

I agree, anyone claiming more then I dunno maybe 30 mls might have something else going on, i simple don’t think it’s possible to cum litres without faking it or some sort of biological issue making it seem that way. And surely if you did…some guys with HS leak and you’d just be peeing cum constantly if that was the case I think. Also I don’t think hyperspermia is a condition in the sense people think, it seems to be the name of a symptom.

Like if I was hyper salivating for instance, I don’t think a doctor would just put that on a paper, there’s obviously some cause, it’s a symbom of something

Thanks for confirming that the clinical diagnosis is based on volume.

You mentioned in a later post that wonder if the average had increased over the years. Another thing that occurs to me is that the people seen by fertility clinics are people where the couple are experiencing fertility problems. That doesn't necessarily mean there is any issue with the man and the clinics may see enough men for which the other parameters are completely normal that simply averaging the volume across those they see would yield a perfectly good result. But, if someone is proclaiming "This is the average, determined by medics in a proper lab" I would hope there had been some effort to make sure it was a good cross section of the population, not just the people who submitted samples in connection with fertility.

I also wonder what the purpose is of identifying this as a condition and giving it a name. I have read that it can be associated with infertility, but that doesn't seem to be a foregone conclusion. What practical effect does it have on a man's life to be told he has hyperspermia?

I also like your how you compare this to being tall vs. being a giant. I think it is worth noting, though, that even the largest giants have not been ten times the height of a normal person. With liquid, we're very bad at estimating volume when it isn't together in one place, but I think 50ml would be a very impressive ejaculation, visually. If someone claims to be producing 500ml or more it seems having put something in their bladder which they are then pissing out is a much more likely explanation than having a prostate gland or seminal vesicles able to produce that much.

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

Only time will tell, now that Gen Z is reaching its late twenties now we will probably see data at some point with volume included. I feel with a lot of things about the younger generations it’s very internet inspired, while I won’t rule out generational factors I think the growth of the internet has spurred a lot of this on.

1. The ease of displaying one’s sexuality, in the internet we’ve basically been given a safe place to be exhibitionistic, and people with that tendancy can now indulge and it’s very much celebrated and rewarded. I post to the hyperspermia board and I get upvotes, comments and even DMs, this means guys who cum big will absolutely post their loads.

1.5 Ever noticed how you’ll barely ever see a self admitted real average load on Reddit? The closest you get is people going “This is average for me” then posting a big nut, I feel this has warped people’s perception. This I think is why there’s so much infighting on the subreddit about what hyperspermia is when infact the mods seem to think (and I do honestly) that the vast majority of content that stays up on the sub is appropriate and counts as hyperspermia, we know this because average loads get called out immediately and removed, so in a way I think moderation on subs like ours contributed to this “raising of the bar” so to speak in terms of volume.

2. Because of the internet no matter who you are you can post a massive nut online, and Lemme tell ya if you can do it you are insentivised to do so, again this is why you get above average loads and above on Reddit mostly, exceptionalism is promoted, in other words big loads and hyperspermia are funnelled in, and so people start arguing about what it is and what counts because “surely not all of them have it” of course this is true..but unless your going to demand proof how would you know?

In short I feel it might just be an illusion of the internet being so accessable now, hell it’s mostly young guys posting and as we know hyperspermia isn’t magic and age might beat it in time

A thing to think about, if guys are hacking off a lot more, that would decrease their volume on average, most of my load videos are second or third in makes me wonder what thd new Gen could cum if they didn’t touch it for a while ZD

Its possible that way more frequently ejaculating and such have caused their bodies to produce more, therefore making the average go up and therefore making more "infighting"(not even entertaining the liters amount that some vehemently define it as) about what volume levels are true hyperspermia. I haven't heard or looked into anything about fertility levels for today's 20 year olds.

Also I hope all that is coherent. I haven't been in a good headspace and also not fully sober.

 

[Acratopotes]

I think something people need to bear in mind is that hyperspermia is often a symptom of something and not a condition on its own, some guys have it genetically yeah but apparently prostate infections and other such stuff or even abstaining for some men can induce hyperspermia.

That's an interesting point. Going back to the analogy with height, I looked up Dwarfism and found that is defined by height, not underlying mechanism. There will be people whose height meets that criteria who are just the extreme end of normal variation but have nothing wrong while others may have something that can be treated. Likewise, we know that some giants are that size because of pituitary tumors.

In heath, it seems there a few cases where we look at the measurement of a characteristic against the known distribution and then consider those at the extremes worthy of further investigation to check where there is some treatable condition going on.

I love the subreddit, posted a few times too, I wish there was more discussion and research but alas no scientist is going to spend the bucks on research just to satisfy a bunch of dudes who want to know if they cum a lot

Unless guys got together to fund some research. Guys do seem to have a fascination with cumming, and why not as it is one of life's pleasures and part of our identity as men, so I am sure there would be some researchers who would happily do the work if they would be paid for it. As it is, we get is fertility treatment - there is definitely money in that, and prostate issues such as cancer and BPH.

 

[Acratopotes]

A thing to think about, if guys are hacking off a lot more, that would decrease their volume on average, most of my load videos are second or third in makes me wonder what the new Gen could cum if they didn’t touch it for a while ZD

Back when I was younger, between 19 and somewhere in my early twenties, I did do a couple of measurements. At the time I was single and masturbated twice most days: first thing in the morning and last thing at night. One day I wondered how much difference it would make if I left it longer so I measured my load for one day at the usual twice/day and got 3ml, then left it 24hr, measured again and got 5ml.

That seems an almost linear relationship but not quite and I can't say for sure if that is due to the accuracy of the measurements or whether, even in 24hrs, that is showing that the rate of increase is slowing down, i.e. that the glands refill quite quickly to start with, i.e. from empty or almost empty, then slow as they become more full.

I can only remember one occasion when I went a whole week between ejaculations when there wasn't some disease that had affected my horniness, and the impression I got when I did finally cum was that , while the quantity was quite a bit more than after 12h, it wasn't 14x more. It was, however, also noticeably thicker.

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

Yeah I’ve noticed this too, a common marker for HS online is that you shouldn’t need to abstain much after nutting yourself dry. But it makes a lot of sense. If you just naturally produce more then of course you’d fill quicker of course this depends on the person, if your nutting constsntly obviously your loads will suffer

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

That's an interesting point. Going back to the analogy with height, I looked up Dwarfism and found that is defined by height, not underlying mechanism. There will be people whose height meets that criteria who are just the extreme end of normal variation but have nothing wrong while others may have something that can be treated. Likewise, we know that some giants are that size because of pituitary tumors.

In heath, it seems there a few cases where we look at the measurement of a characteristic against the known distribution and then consider those at the extremes worthy of further investigation to check where there is some treatable condition going on.



Unless guys got together to fund some research. Guys do seem to have a fascination with cumming, and why not as it is one of life's pleasures and part of our identity as men, so I am sure there would be some researchers who would happily do the work if they would be paid for it. As it is, we get is fertility treatment - there is definitely money in that, and prostate issues such as cancer and BPH.

I think it would be more for fertility treatment, I’d like to see hyperspermia studied more, it’s called the forgotten condition in a few articles I’ve seen

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

That's an interesting point. Going back to the analogy with height, I looked up Dwarfism and found that is defined by height, not underlying mechanism. There will be people whose height meets that criteria who are just the extreme end of normal variation but have nothing wrong while others may have something that can be treated. Likewise, we know that some giants are that size because of pituitary tumors.

This is a important part of the discussion I feel in regards to the constant infighting in these circles.

Personally I feel the term “True Hyperspermia” refers to those with genetic predisposition but as we know it’s possible for guys to reach those levels temporarily at points in their life, they’re often too busy looking for thst magic gene factor sometimes because of course you feel like an X man

 

[Acratopotes]

...but as we know it’s possible for guys to reach those levels temporarily at points in their life...

That's a really interesting point. I had clicked on this thread originally because it intrigued me, not because I believed I have hyperspermia. Then, when I posted those measurements in my last post, I though that may possibly cross the threshold. I had not measured over a longer time but 48hr may have been enough to break the 6.5ml threshold.

But go forward a few years, my wife and I had two children without any difficulty, avoiding any kind of hormonal contraception between the first two, then she went on depot-provera. After a slightly longer gap we decided to have a third, she didn't get her injection topped up again and yet, after the normal time for things to return to normal, she still wasn't pregnant and was starting to worry. As part of the process to investigate this, I had to have a semen analysis and, at 48, it was right on the average and everything else was normal. She did get pregnant shortly after that, and we concluded it had just taken longer than average for her body to get back to normal.

Now it is generally accepted that volume does decrease with advancing age. Does that mean a threshold has been set, based on an average across a variety of ages, that means that many men who are simply young and ordinarily healthy may qualify?

It's funny how you can look back at things and interpret them more than one way. Someone posted much earlier in the thread saying what an ordeal hyperspermia was, because you had to cum more often than usual to keep from getting pain/aches. I get the impression that twice/day masturbation was probably a bit more than many of my peers were doing. But, for me, in the morning it wasn't that I couldn't start the day until I had rubbed one out; there were times when I did. But, on a normal day, I'd be horny then, I would know I would enjoy a good wank, and then I'd get a break from being horny and start the working day in a good mood so why not? But I also remember occasional afternoons when I'd have to sneak off to a cubicle to rub one out so I could then concentrate; possibly these were times when I had slept through the alarm so had to dash out and missed the morning session. None of this was an ordeal and I never thought of it as weird or unusual.

The other thing I will post in separate thread in case someone objects and it gets deleted.

 

[Acratopotes]

Continuing from my previous post, I had gone to a scout camp and was sharing a tent with two other boys. Last thing at night we'd each masturbated inside our sleeping bags so, while we knew what we were each doing, we couldn't see. When it came to wipe up, though, we did see how much we had each ejaculated.

At the time, I was 12.5 and the next oldest was 14. I remember being surprised that he didn't seem to have ejaculated any more than me. I just put that down to having started puberty. Maybe that is the explanation, or maybe not.

 

[Cheeky_Incubus]

That's a really interesting point. I had clicked on this thread originally because it intrigued me, not because I believed I have hyperspermia. Then, when I posted those measurements in my last post, I though that may possibly cross the threshold. I had not measured over a longer time but 48hr may have been enough to break the 6.5ml threshold.

But go forward a few years, my wife and I had two children without any difficulty, avoiding any kind of hormonal contraception between the first two, then she went on depot-provera. After a slightly longer gap we decided to have a third, she didn't get her injection topped up again and yet, after the normal time for things to return to normal, she still wasn't pregnant and was starting to worry. As part of the process to investigate this, I had to have a semen analysis and, at 48, it was right on the average and everything else was normal. She did get pregnant shortly after that, and we concluded it had just taken longer than average for her body to get back to normal.

Now it is generally accepted that volume does decrease with advancing age. Does that mean a threshold has been set, based on an average across a variety of ages, that means that many men who are simply young and ordinarily healthy may qualify?

It's funny how you can look back at things and interpret them more than one way. Someone posted much earlier in the thread saying what an ordeal hyperspermia was, because you had to cum more often than usual to keep from getting pain/aches. I get the impression that twice/day masturbation was probably a bit more than many of my peers were doing. But, for me, in the morning it wasn't that I couldn't start the day until I had rubbed one out; there were times when I did. But, on a normal day, I'd be horny then, I would know I would enjoy a good wank, and then I'd get a break from being horny and start the working day in a good mood so why not? But I also remember occasional afternoons when I'd have to sneak off to a cubicle to rub one out so I could then concentrate; possibly these were times when I had slept through the alarm so had to dash out and missed the morning session. None of this was an ordeal and I never thought of it as weird or unusual.

The other thing I will post in separate thread in case someone objects and it gets deleted.

That’s a interesting thing to look at.

People like to pretend hyperspermia is magic and immune to all things that decrease volume but this obviously isn’t true.

I’ve read in a few papers that genetics plays a large role in volume but also your environment too, hydration and diet, I notice if I’m dehydrated my loads really suffer.

It’s possible that a lot more men have it but due to factors such as bad diet it isn’t catching.

I think the reality could be a couple of things.

1. Internet bias, people don’t really post average loads as I’ve seen, they just talk about them and so what is visually hyperspermia is schewed, hence all the fighting online on “What is a big load?” Vs HS remember in a lot of HS communities they make all sorts of stupid rules to gatekeep.

2. That as stated above hyperspermia isn’t impervious to shitty diets and age and so those with the proclivity will tend to be healthy younger people.

3. A lot more men have it then we thought and those who are interested in learning are often coomers and so cum themselves to the point of havign notbing to shoot