It's The Ball Size That Really Matters.

Couldn’t agree more that the size of a man’s balls is directly correlated with how manly he is.

The only point of contention I have is around the role of well-endowed men in gay sex. As a submissive bottom myself, a lot of the attributes a woman looks for while fertile, are hard wired into me as well. I can sense when a man is going to be able to pump me full of enough sperm to satisfy me, just by the pheromones he gives off. However, the inverse is also true and a small-balled man has no business or right being a top.

Men with large balls are simply superior men and deserve every privilege that can be afforded to them.
 
The OP's ode to ball size virility and breeding is interesting.

I am an "animal farmer" (as the OP would say) and can confirm I do look at the conformation, shape, size, and symmetry of my bull and ram testicles as part of the decisions on who should be allowed to breed and who gets castrated and winds up on someone's dinner plate. Rams are the breeding kings, 1 ram can comfortably service 30 ewes, mating each multiple times, in a month without losing condition. With bulls/cows it is more like 1:10 or 1:15. The pursuit and foreplay is long, the intercourse is over in <10 seconds. The human equivalent is Genghis Khan, genetic research estimates 1 in 200 people on earth are his descendants.
You need a new Bull if he's only knocking up 10 of your cows Bud! Mine will nail a heard of 50 or more in nothing flat
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssss
I would have to agree with most of what you say. However, there are a few caveats. I think there are a few reason so much emphasis is put on penis size over testicle size. Status, woman like to brag when they have a hung guy as well as society sees these men as more masculine. Also the penis usually gives direct pleasure to a woman, while testicles mainly give visual excitement to a woman, so does a large penis. Sure women like when a heavy set of balls slap against their pussy or ass while they are getting fucked, but if the guy has a small or averages size penis, it usually won’t be as pleasurable. Also studies have shown for orgasms, longer penises were better. Another study showed that, while not necessary, orgasm increased odds of conception by 15%. Reason believed is because of the upsuck theory. When a woman orgasms, her vagina contracts, this contraction is believed to pull the semen up into the cervix. Also the head of a penis is designed to displace a competitors sperm. It basically plunges it out and pulls it further from the cervix allowing the longer penis to have an advantage for placing his sperm in a less accessible area where shorter guys wouldn’t be able to reach to pull out their sperm. During ovulation, women usually want deeper and rougher sex. I’ve noticed with my wife. Usually if she ask me to put my penis in her is right after her period. When she is ovulating, she doesn’t let me in her (as i am small) as she is too horny and wants me to use her biggest toys that stretch her. Woman are also much more likely to cheat when they are ovulating. Just like men are hard wired to be attracted to certain things like wide hips and large breast because they are signs that they can bear offspring and feed their babies, women are hard wired to look for certain things as well. Women often look for security. This can be financial security, physical security (protection) and other types of security. I think these things trump penis size or testicle size most of the time. Penis size and genital size are only very important to most woman during their fertile period. This probably explains why you don’t necessarily need a big dick/balls to get a girl, but if you aren’t subconsciously viewed by them as being “alpha” and having a large package that can give them what they need when they are ovulating, the chances of them looking elsewhere for that missing piece is high. And from what I’ve seen on this site, although not everyone with a big cock has huge balls, the majority of them have above average sized balls. I’ve also noticed that most small guys have small balls, although there are exceptions, this is the majority. Bigger testicles produce more testosterone as well as sperm. High levels of testosterone during puberty have been linked to increasing penis size, but only until puberty is finished.

I myself having very small testicles can attest to most of what you’re saying. I had a semen analysis. I had a total spent count of 3 million. Low is anything below 40 million and average is between 100-200 million with many men being able to produce even more. My sperm were also slow swimmers. After I cum, I can get hard again, but if I cum, I have a dry orgasm the second time. It takes a day before I’ll actually have semen come out again and 2-3 days before it is a normal amount. So for me, not being able to cum very much/frequently, not being able to place my sperm deep into the vagina (further swimming distance as well as being higher risk for competition to remove my sperm), slow swimming sperm which makes the distance they have to travel even further, exhausting them and having more sperm die before they reach the egg. Even a guy ejaculating 200 million sperm only have about 200 total reach the egg. I’d have to agree that my genitals were designated for reproduction. Although still possible, it isn’t as much of a chance as most others.

I guess in conclusion I agree that large balls are very important and important to women. I do believe penis size is just as important for them tho
I disagree with most everything you have said, none is based in fact! Penis size or testicle size have nothing to do with knocking up a woman and sperm can live in a vagina for up to 5 days just waiting on an egg, no big dick or plunger head is going to pull it out to replace it with there own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0Pippo
I disagree with most everything you have said, none is based in fact! Penis size or testicle size have nothing to do with knocking up a woman and sperm can live in a vagina for up to 5 days just waiting on an egg, no big dick or plunger head is going to pull it out to replace it with there own.
Also, it is well documented that bigger testicles produce more sperm. More sperm means more chance for insemination. An average guy has between 100-200 million sperm, out of those, only about 200 make it all the way to the egg. A guy with less sperm have the same percentage of the sperm making it to the egg, so a guy with 50 million sperm would have about 50 sperm reach the egg on average. A guy with 500 million will have approximately 500 sperm reach the egg. Penis size directly does not have an increased chance of pregnancy UNLESS there are multiple partners during a close period.
 
I disagree with most everything you have said, none is based in fact! Penis size or testicle size have nothing to do with knocking up a woman and sperm can live in a vagina for up to 5 days just waiting on an egg, no big dick or plunger head is going to pull it out to replace it with there own.
Although penis size doesn’t necessarily mean more fertile, studies show when a woman climaxes, she is up to 15% more likely to become pregnant. This is believed to have to do with the “upsuck theory” in which when a woman orgasms, the contractions act as a vacuum and pull the semen into the cervix. Sperm retention has been shown to be higher when she has an orgasm.

There are also links between penis length and vaginal orgasms. Studies have shown that women had more vaginal orgasms with deeper penetration and longer than average penises vs. shorter penises.

Putting my previous post and this one together = bigger testicles create more sperm than smaller ones. (it up if you don’t believe me)
-Longer penis can place sperm closer to the cervix, thus giving him an advantage over other males who have ejaculated in the vagina recently.
-Longer penises will scoop out semen from other men who weren’t able to deposit it as deep.
-Longer penis creates higher chance of orgasm.
-Orgasms create up to 15% higher chance of pregnancy, likely due to the “upsuck theory”.

So once again, having small testicles doesn’t necessarily mean you aren’t fertile. It only takes 1 sperm to get someone pregnant. However, low sperm count reduces the chances of pregnancy. High sperm counts increase the chances of pregnancy.
Penis size doesn’t mean more fertile, but orgasms can boost fertility for women and longer penises are better at giving women vaginal orgasms.
Penis size only has an advantage if a woman has had multiple sexual partners with in her fertile period.

Women Who Prefer Longer Penises Are More Likely to Have Vaginal Orgasms (but Not Clitoral Orgasms): Implications for an Evolutionary Theory of Vaginal Orgasm

Women are up to 15% more likely to become pregnant if they ORGASM
 
Dude, I posted two actual studies and one article written based off of a study. Regardless to how you or anyone else feels, the facts say otherwise. It sounds more like you’re saying that this is bullshit based off your own personal beliefs which hold no scientific rationale rather than basing it on actual science, even when the studies are literally put in front of your face. I’m not saying small penised men, or small testicled men can’t be fathers, of course they can. I’m just supplying the data that shows if all else was equal, the higher semen count has a better likelihood of being the father. And if all else was equal but one guy was longer, he’d have a higher likelihood of fathering the child in the same woman.
Many animals penises actually pull out semen from competition. Cats for example have a rake like ability that literally scrapes out competing sperm. In monkys, bigger testicles are believed to be developed because it increases the chance of fathering offspring. Gorilla’s have small testicles because they don’t need to compete, usually the females only mate with 1 male, therefore eliminating the need for more semen than a competitor.
 
When Sperm Compete, Nature’s Call Leads to Bigger ... Testicles
^^^
explaining why chimps have large testes compared to body size, humans have medium testes compared to body size and gorillas have small testes compared to body size


Explaining that larger testes equal more sperm

https://www.idahofertility.com/the-...5,000 sperm,penetrates and fertilizes the egg!
^^^
states that only about 200 sperm on average reach the egg out of 250 million total sperm.

Women Prefer Bigger Penises, May Have Shaped Evolution
^^^
States that one theory for humans having large penis relative to body size compared to other primates is because of women’s preference for larger penises. It did say that hip to waist ratio was more important for determining attractiveness, but men who were both tall and had larger penises rated highest on the attractiveness scale.
It also states that the larger the penis (up to a point) the more attractive the guy rated. Gallup (who is the one behind the study showing semen displacement) does bring up one flaw of the study, in that flaccid penis isn’t always a good indicator of erect size. This may be true, but a guy who is 1.5” soft probably still won’t be as big hard in most cases compared to a guy who is 4” soft. Since you have to sign up to read this last article, here are a few points from it:
 

Attachments

I’m also not saying that penis size/testicle size is the most important factor for women. As I mentioned in an earlier post, most women seek security in some form over anything else. And since women can’t really see a man naked until a certain point, it doesn’t play as much of a role in their overall decision. But there is also such a thing as “big dick energy” women say it about a man who is confident. You don’t have to be big to have big dick energy. But most guys with bigger ducks are confident and most guys who have larger balls have more testosterone and are also more confident and show more “alpha male” characteristics that help attract females.
 
  • Like
Reactions: docs20i and Cut9801
Try going free ball!
Gravity helps!
They will hang lower!
Most of the time there is nothing to "hang". Its only when im relaxed sitting or laying down when they arent shriveled. Even when coming out of a hot shower they are pathetic. It wasn't always this way. They used to be close enough to normal that I at least wasn't embarrassed by them like i am now. Sucks because my wife used to like playing with them and like them flopping against her during sex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wade2001du
I'm just one gu
Also, it is well documented that bigger testicles produce more sperm. More sperm means more chance for insemination. An average guy has between 100-200 million sperm, out of those, only about 200 make it all the way to the egg. A guy with less sperm have the same percentage of the sperm making it to the egg, so a guy with 50 million sperm would have about 50 sperm reach the egg on average. A guy with 500 million will have approximately 500 sperm reach the egg. Penis size directly does not have an increased chance of pregnancy UNLESS there are multiple partners during a close period.

I'm only one guy, so I count as no more than anecdotal evidence, but I have EXTREMELY large testicles (proof in my gallery), and when my sperm was checked about 9 years ago they found a total of about 959 million sperm, and that was after only 36 hours of abstinence. I guess if I'd waited 48 to 72 hours (like they asked me to), there would have been a lot more.
 
My question is, in terms of livestock breeding, do our farmers here ever have an issue with a big-balled bull with a low sperm count, low semen volume, low testosterone levels, or low sperm motility issues?

For humans, Reproductive Endocrinologists can tell you that even a certain percentage of the male population with larger than average testicles will have the issues as stated above.

It is known that extended exposure to benzenes, toluene, xylene, herbicides, pesticides, organic solvents, painting materials, lead and other heavy metals can contribute to low sperm counts.

So it seems there are always exceptions to the rule. Documentation of the type of environment in which specific herds of livestock are raised might also be helpful when determining which male to acquire for expanding one's own herd of cattle or horses.
 
This was an interesting thread to read!
I certainly have been told I have big, low hanging balls, and I do cum in rather large quantities. But I have never been approached for “breeding”.
 

Attachments

I love having a big set, they do get tight when I dump a fat load, but when I’m in a fucking rhythm I loveeee the feel of their weight and slapping against an ass or thigh as I fuck. Personally I’d love if they were even a little bigger - but I have already enough bulge and then I’m entering my fathers territory of barely fitting in his briefs
 
I was bred dozens of times over the course of a few years by a 'Breeder King'. His massive sack was the size of a softball, and my hand couldn't wrap around the full girth of his cock. My body rejoiced for days after he filled me with his seed.

I don't have scientific evidence that his semen changed me, but his presence in my life activated growth physically and beyond.

I think there are likely forms of DNA transfer/activation that we don't know or understand. We know that in epigenetics, certain signals from the environment can turn genes on and off. I think men being inseminated by other men could induce changes in the receiver's biology.

Do we really think that a man's load will do nothing to the receiver? Do we really think that the gift of dna, nutrients and hormones in the sperm of a 'Breeder King' would have no effect on a man?

And even if not, since ancient times, people have known to make libations to the spirits and the gods, to leave offerings to the land in gratitude for abundance. And I can hardly think of a better libation for seminal abundance than a man ploughing his seed into the tight, warm embrace of another man's sacred center.
 
My balls are quite large and I’ve had no problem getting the wife pregnant. Matter of fact with the last pregnancy we did and experiment to see if one ejaculation would work and it did. I have buddies that try for months before they get their wives pregnant. I know there a lots of factors involved but thought that this would be good food for thought.