Joseph Yates Bodybuilder
- Thread starter Darklord986
- Start date
if you use the web version on mozilla firefox and disable hardware acceleration, you can record/screenshot stuff. someone bless up plsss
He’s really hot. He’ll definitely share more and more if the feedback and money he gets is good.
I can’t believe he’s showing dick and high quality cum vids so quickly. All for a small subscription fee. Must not have any reservations about going into porn content. Hot wild stud
oblong1
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2020
- Posts
- 43
- Media
- 3
- Likes
- 68
- Points
- 28
- Location
- Manchester (England)
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I think it is worth it actually 2 pound subscription is practically nothing then you can pay no more than 12 pounds for each cum vid, and apparently ass play but I didn't want to spend any more
What do people think of this UV app/platform? Better or worse than OnlyFans?? It seems like a simpler interface and seems to maybe be more user friendly than OF which is so buggy and feels like it hasn’t been updated in years.
I don’t think I’ll be re subscribing, the stuff he posts for “free” on the feed (after paying a subscription) aren’t worth it IMO, it’s cool that he posts occasionally free previews or a dick pic here and there, but what’s the point if he’s gonna delete them in literally 2 minutes lol.
He’s using the the same strategy as a free OF, you subscribe and get shirtless pics and mild stuff but for the good stuff you actually have to pay around 10-15 bucks for each vid, which is not a lot, but then again, you're already paying a subscription in the first place.
Sounds like a good idea by him. One of the biggest complaints of OF for creators is that if you charge a subscription fee for your entire page you can’t then charge your individual posts. But for creators that’s often a problem because they want to keep their entire page more private by requiring a subscription, even if just a dollar or two, but then they also want to charge for higher end content without having to send it through private DMs which is completely logical. Looks like UV is a solution to that problem.
Sending a private dm with a locked photo and posting a photo behind a lock is the same. Different method same principle.
No it's not. Private OF DMs only get sent out to current subscribers and aren't available to new subscribers who subscribe after the DM was sent out.
Posting to your wall/profile behind a lock is available automatically to all subscribers at any point in time.
That's the biggest problem with OF for creators. And OF hasn't been improved or updated its interface in years. It's becoming archaic technology design.
I mean compared to the prices that most people put on OF for those vs what he charges is alot different. It is also clearly stated what content you are purchasing from him, no ambiguous paragraphs for a dick print like alot of OF are.
I didn’t say the prices were the same, I said the METHOD.
I literally said what he charges isn’t a lot but k.
- gs08,
I subscribed. The 2 dollar charge to view the account shows zero nudes. If you want to see the actual stuff (which he does show) it’s behind a pay wall. What he does show is pretty good and worth it.
As explained, it’s not. Locked wall posts go to any and all subs at any and all times. Private DMs only go to subs at the moment they’re sent.
Kappabunny
Expert Member
Why you so pressed.... Also you didn't say the METHOD was the same, you said the Principle which is what I was elaborating on. But k
Similar threads
