D_Harry_Scholnga
Sexy Member
Where did you see wet underwear pics that even suggested a big cock?
Google it.
Where did you see wet underwear pics that even suggested a big cock?
Those pictures are only a few months ago and I know he is still a minor but they are hardly pics of him when he was 12.
Alot of creepy mother fuckers is this thread.
Those pictures are only a few months ago and I know he is still a minor but they are hardly pics of him when he was 12.
If you are interested in some dude that looks 13, no matter what his real age is, I still consider it peodophelia even if the law doesn't.
There are probably guys who are 16 who look more like real men than justin bieber who is technically and adult male.
My only interest in this kid is whether he is cut or not. He was born after Ontario started to drop circ rates. So he may be uncut.
Under 18 is under 18.
The board is just being careful about USA laws. Yes, they are being extra careful but wouldn't you if you were the owner or had some control over this board? Child porn (which technically is anyone under 18, though I get what people are saying about porn and non porn aspects of these posts) laws are not something that anyone wants to be seen to break in anyway shape or form. They are just being cautious. Though I agree that just commenting that a cute young guy is a cute young guy and will one day be a hunk is a bit over cautious but it's their call.
I too understand the owner being cautious. However, my post to those who are saying this is creepy, he's just turned 18, and how those of us who are commenting that he is cute are border pedo's. it's ridiculous.
I agree. Some people on this site are very hysterical. Probably because there are so many americans on this site. And we know that in the USA people are sooooo hysterical about teenagers sexuality
I think it´s stupid that people almost think it´s pedophilia to discuss about a 18 yo teenboy. Only in America people are so hysterical, and well: maybe also in Great Britain LOL
I also think it´s strange that you cannot even refer to non nude pictures of a 16-17 yo. Please, be serious! There is nothing pornographic about such images. People are far to hysterical. And I have discussed this even with the mods of this site. They know my opinion, and they know that I find the rules on this site a little exaggerated, even that I do understand why they have those rules (because they don´t want to risk anything, and that´s understandable. But my points is still, that there is NOTHING illegal about refering to a non nude pic of Justin Bieber as a 16 or 17 old where he is just singing on a stage...the site doesn´t risk ANYTHING by allowing such pics to be posted. But that ´s just my opinion...).
I actually agree with much of what you say, but wanted to comment on the bolded section.
While it may technically not be illegal, it is against the rules here. To some that may seem extreme, but Rob has made that rule to ensure that we as members, and this site as a whole are all protected from even the slightest indication of minors being featured on this site.
All it would take would be for one over zealous do gooder to happen to see a pic of a minor on a site primarily about penises and sexual situations, and they could cause a lot of problems, not too mention getting the law involved.
Rob owns this site, and has the right and the responsability of keeping himself, and us safe.