Let's settle this, cut or uncut? from an aesthetic point.

[curtdude]

I was cut at 19 I have had my cock both ways and for me I preferred having foreskin on my cock. I kept it clean no oder it was easier to masterbate. the look I do mot have a preference both are nice as long as there is a nice set of hanging balls with it

 

[18615941]

Cut. No contest

Agree.

 

[deleted814719]

I was circumcized at birth so I had no choice. However, I do think that cut cocks look better aesthetically.

As for "settling" this, I say to each his own.

 

[Mcuthigh]

Uncut, though of course there are some ugly ass uncut cocks. But I think in general the look of a natural penis is more aesthetic. Most circumcision scars are kind of revolting to me. I don't understand why anyone would prefer the look of a mangled cock.

I prefer the aesthetic CUT cock look 100%. An uncut dick looks like “someone“ left the ”job” unfinished. A high and tight Circumcised cock looks clean and complete in appearance with the very sensitive scar hi lighting the very fact that CUT dudes are, in fact, quite proud. I do not understand why anyone would prefer the look of a malformed cock.

 

[tunameltsmyheart]

uncut. y’all are missing the primary function of the penis is sex. and foreskin makes that so natural. it’s so sexy. only people with attraction to penises even should have a day here lol

 

[deleted18808591]

cut for sure

 

[bbnc44]

Which option do u think is more aesthetically pleasing? Cut or uncut

Cut..

 

[Acratopotes]

I think there is a pretty small chance of this being settled once and for all because aesthetics is subjective and there are number of factors at work.

1. People have a tendency to prefer what they're used to seeing. I don't know if the same is true elsewhere, but here the fashion in clothing has recently changed to have a high waist and it looked very odd at first. I also remember it looking odd when the fashion went the other way, i.e. the waist band of clothing went down to hip level. It also wasn't so long ago that Simon Cowell was made fun of for having an unfashionably high waist.

2. People are influence by cultural attitudes. Here's one example:

I prefer the aesthetic CUT cock look 100%. An uncut dick looks like “someone“ left the ”job” unfinished. A high and tight Circumcised cock looks clean and complete in appearance with the very sensitive scar hi lighting the very fact that CUT dudes are, in fact, quite proud. I do not understand why anyone would prefer the look of a malformed cock.

So "looks clean" - relataed to an American obsession with cleanliness. Not that people from other nations don't like to be clean too but we don't seem to have the same obsession with it. Also, "job unfinished" as if inaction is some kind of sin.

Neither of these is innate - they are learned values. A good deal of invention comes from a dislike of work - from people contemplating "If only I could make a machine to do this job I would not have to do it myself".

Here's another one to prove it doesn't just work the one way:

...Most circumcision scars are kind of revolting to me. I don't understand why anyone would prefer the look of a mangled cock.

Again a dislike of scars is not innate. The next sentence gives the game away when calling a cut cock "mangled".

3. People don't want to believe that something that has been done to them is actually pointless so, given the very sketchy evidence of any health benefit, they have to believe in some other benefit, like "at least it looks better".

So, after that, you won't be surprised to learn that I am uncut and, though it is not a strong preference, of the two I prefer uncut.

 

[Punkroyale]

Uncut all the way

 

[thickgeo]

I think there is a pretty small chance of this being settled once and for all because aesthetics is subjective and there are number of factors at work.

1. People have a tendency to prefer what they're used to seeing. I don't know if the same is true elsewhere, but here the fashion in clothing has recently changed to have a high waist and it looked very odd at first. I also remember it looking odd when the fashion went the other way, i.e. the waist band of clothing went down to hip level. It also wasn't so long ago that Simon Cowell was made fun of for having an unfashionably high waist.

2. People are influence by cultural attitudes. Here's one example:

So "looks clean" - relataed to an American obsession with cleanliness. Not that people from other nations don't like to be clean too but we don't seem to have the same obsession with it. Also, "job unfinished" as if inaction is some kind of sin.

Neither of these is innate - they are learned values. A good deal of invention comes from a dislike of work - from people contemplating "If only I could make a machine to do this job I would not have to do it myself".

Here's another one to prove it doesn't just work the one way:

Again a dislike of scars is not innate. The next sentence gives the game away when calling a cut cock "mangled".

3. People don't want to believe that something that has been done to them is actually pointless so, given the very sketchy evidence of any health benefit, they have to believe in some other benefit, like "at least it looks better".

So, after that, you won't be surprised to learn that I am uncut and, though it is not a strong preference, of the two I prefer uncut.

Thank you for then dissertation to prove the obvious, that norms are socially determined rather than innate. However, aversion to scars is a rather murky area. Clearly scars are older than aesthetic norms around them and hint towards injury and so it is perfectly reasonable to assume that aversion to scars harken to an older, more deeply rooted awareness of the body. Clearly this changes when situated in a new regime of bodily aesthetics, which perfectly explains the aversion to foreskin, which every single human male is born with.

 

[tgirlsrgreat]

Here we go again

but my preference for myself and partners is cut!. won't keep me away mind you! just a preference!

 

[wet4skin]

Uncut for sure. Long dangling foreskins. Shorter snug foreskins. Big loose hoods (great for docking). I know that here in U.S. most people think a foreskin is unattractive; believe me, I've been hearing it my entire life, and plenty of potential sex partners suddenly lost interest when they discovered that I didn't have a cut cock. But this thread asks about aesthetics, so I'll just say that whether I'm in a locker room or standing at a row of urinals or in any of the other places where we men are likely to notice other guys' dicks, it's the intact cocks that are, to me, the most attractive, the most appealing.

 

[Stephenmass]

but my preference for myself and partners is cut!. won't keep me away mind you! just a preference!

I understand and preference is OK. I just felt that it was going where I've seen threads go 1000 times. Nothing personal.

 

[tgirlsrgreat]

I understand and preference is OK. I just felt that it was going where I've seen threads go 1000 times. Nothing personal.

of course it will!

 

[rbi99]

Masturbating by holding your cock at the base and shaking it to allow the foreskin to slide back and forth over the glans is an experience not to be missed. Unfortunatly those circumcised guys will never experience this.

Not necessarily true. I am fully cut and though my glans is always totally exposed hard or soft, I have enough skin on my shaft to easily go up and over my glans when it is stroked.

 

[sissyjanine]

Cut

 

[Sturdywords]

As a Brit I will have to go with UNmutilated.

 

[Stanleys-world]

A Doctor's Opinion Here is a link to doctors against circumcision and some of the reasons.
I am grateful every day that I am not circumcised.