Loverboybrad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree but just as a general observation this must be one of the biggest issues for content creators I’d imagine. How many different ways can you jerk off, take a shower, or shoot a photo. Post too often and you burn people out even quicker. Post too little and people get pissed. That must be why they’ve switched to so much ppv and sexting bots.
One item I always found weird was when they offer to rate your penis for a fee. Who really pays someone $20 to tell them if they have an ugly dick? I’ve been doing it for free way too long 🤣
They rate your penis? Omg. That must be a humiliation kink lolololol
 
Hey @LoverBoyBrad are you still scamming guys out of their money by telling them you love them and that they are yours? It’s funny how when a person stops your subscription those former subs don’t exists until you need some money and you reach out again
Does anyone actually fall for that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edefoxx and Whodis
Let’s face it—OnlyFans has given rise to a new type of man: those who identify as "bi" but may not genuinely be so. We’ve all noticed this trend, especially among certain European models (and we know exactly who they are). While it’s crucial to respect how people choose to identify, we cannot ignore the fact that many are simply playing the OnlyFans game. On platforms like LPSG, we rely on the community to determine whether these claims of being "bi" hold any truth or if these men actually produce same-sex content. It serves as a valuable tool to avoid wasting money on misleading assertions.

I recognize that some may not be particularly concerned—perhaps they’d be satisfied if these creators were just honest or, at the very least, produced something that hints at gay content—but the reality is that, more often than not, they don’t. This lack of authenticity raises legitimate suspicions. It’s understandable that people want transparency, as it makes a significant difference. Yet, many creators seem to believe that maintaining an air of mystery is more profitable. They often enhance their bi persona on platforms like Instagram or X, engaging with openly gay creators or gay-themed content, but rarely follow through with any actual engagement.

I’ve seen members of this forum ask, point-blank, whether this creator would be willing to engage with a man—only to be met with silence. He clearly had no issue filming with a woman in the past. That kind of contradiction inevitably raises doubts, and it’s only natural that people would seek more clarity in such cases. At the end of the day, it’s all about profits for these creators, and there’s nothing wrong with that. But it’s important to be discerning about where you choose to invest your money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted24015231
Let’s face it—OnlyFans has given rise to a new type of man: those who identify as "bi" but may not genuinely be so. We’ve all noticed this trend, especially among certain European models (and we know exactly who they are). While it’s crucial to respect how people choose to identify, we cannot ignore the fact that many are simply playing the OnlyFans game. On platforms like LPSG, we rely on the community to determine whether these claims of being "bi" hold any truth or if these men actually produce same-sex content. It serves as a valuable tool to avoid wasting money on misleading assertions.

I recognize that some may not be particularly concerned—perhaps they’d be satisfied if these creators were just honest or, at the very least, produced something that hints at gay content—but the reality is that, more often than not, they don’t. This lack of authenticity raises legitimate suspicions. It’s understandable that people want transparency, as it makes a significant difference. Yet, many creators seem to believe that maintaining an air of mystery is more profitable. They often enhance their bi persona on platforms like Instagram or X, engaging with openly gay creators or gay-themed content, but rarely follow through with any actual engagement.

I’ve seen members of this forum ask, point-blank, whether this creator would be willing to engage with a man—only to be met with silence. He clearly had no issue filming with a woman in the past. That kind of contradiction inevitably raises doubts, and it’s only natural that people would seek more clarity in such cases. At the end of the day, it’s all about profits for these creators, and there’s nothing wrong with that. But it’s important to be discerning about where you choose to invest your money.
That's why it is pointless and stupid to worry about someone else's sexuality. And why the mods have asked people to stop debating it here. Either you enjoy their content or you don't. It's a waste of time to try to divine what actually turns someone else on or not, especially on the internet. If people weren't so caught up with perfectly understanding other people's private sexual feelings, these guys wouldn't feel the need to pretend like it is something other than what it really is. And pressuring someone into making content they aren't comfortable with is incredibly creepy.
 
That's why it is pointless and stupid to worry about someone else's sexuality. And why the mods have asked people to stop debating it here. Either you enjoy their content or you don't. It's a waste of time to try to divine what actually turns someone else on or not, especially on the internet. If people weren't so caught up with perfectly understanding other people's private sexual feelings, these guys wouldn't feel the need to pretend like it is something other than what it really is. And pressuring someone into making content they aren't comfortable with is incredibly creepy.
agreed..let's just move on from this. But now can't post his pictures anymore right? So we do tap about? Ay ideas?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leod1 and Buffyboy
Status
Not open for further replies.