Luke Macfarlane

i went to school with luke from age 10-17.... we went to a school of the arts together in london, ontario and then became friends/drama club/orchestra geeks once we got to high school.... he was always highly popular, always acting and singing, and played the cello.... back then we were both not out and it was never an issue; we just acted in plays, went to orchestra and smoked pot together on the weekends.... every weekend we had crazy sleepovers.... there was 7 of us in the collective, and every weekend we'd all chill together at someone else's house, watch movies, get stoned and basically be silly intellectual teenagers.... i was actually shocked when i heard he was out, but good on him for being who he is and maintaining his integrity in the wake of his fame....

FUN FACT: luke does the most hilarious aaron neville impression that would have you rolling on the floor.... :)

Sounds like a fun guy. Now, did you ever get to see him naked? And if you did, do you have any details? ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: djkrick
uh, no.... that context never came in to play when we hung out.... we were either
a) in public
b) at school
c) at a party
or d) with a group of fully clothed friends

seeing as neither of us were out at that time and we were just friends, the idea of seeing him in the nude never crossed my mind.... and even if i did, i don't think it would be fair to him to speak about it on a forum like this one.... luke has a very high standard of integrity, and i would never jeopardize that by releasing any 'juicy details'.... he's a cool guy, highly talented, and happy....
 
Last edited:
Well said. He just genuinely seems like a decent guy. Cute cute cute, and he sure does come off with our humble Canadian sense of self deprecation. I'd most definitely like a beer and a bong with him any day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: w355291
In this 9-minute short movie named "Erection" about performance problems in sex, Luke Macfarlane acts in his briefs and shows his body for the whole movie. At the end of it, he even JO...

http://vimeo.com/channels/336435/42662576

You can watch it in HD mode, and after you finish it, PLEASE give me an estimation of his size according to the scenes and the bulge in his briefs! Thank you!
And if you can also tell how big his balls are, that will be great!

Here are some screencaps of the movie:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Hnt: if you dont get erection when in bed with a nice girl, you might consider starting by removing underwear. I am amazed how hollywood so often pictures people making love without removing underwear or bras. Bad education for people who learn from those :)

While he has nice body and the shots of him in undewear are nice eye candy, there is very little in there to be able to deduct anything about his cock.
 
It looks like he was really masturbating.:wank: Probably was simulated though.
 
He never gets hard, so it's impossible to say anything about his dick size and the last time I jerked off, my dick was hard, so that didn't look like he was really jerking off to me. Just my opinion.
 
I appreciate Luke Macfarlane's looks, body and that he's been completely open about his sexuality for eons. Just wish he were a better actor. He runs the range of emotions from A to B. Maybe he just needs a better vehicle. (or some intensive acting lessons.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsgarp
I think he is a very good looking guy.
Imagining he is a grower - particularly when he is making out with his sexual preference.
The JO scene doesn't look like he is hard to me at all - I just want to take those underwear off him - while he has his hands in his pants - and see his manhood - soft or hard - his penis is attached to a gorgeous guy!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lvitlarge
Let's turn this question around. How can you tell that he DOES get hard? I see no evidence of an erection.

In the scene of his JO, if you watch it very carefully in HD mode, you can see that there is a bulge of a hard thing according to the shape and movement of the texture of his underwear cloth. If it's his penis head, then he must have been hard. And besides, the position of the bulge on his briefs when he JOs tells that the size is quite different from the one in the scene of his standing in front of the window. And I think the difference is between soft and hard, or semi-hard at least.

Could you give me some clue indicating he is not hard in the JO scene?
 
One has to remember that what may last 30 seconds on the editor copy may have spanned hours on set. So while he may had had onset of erection while having hand in underwear, hours later when they shot the other scene, he would have been as flaccid as a rotten celery.

We don't really see any VPL in there. We see his hand under underwear, but not the penis.