Where did your
1f440.svg
go first?
FnUrkxcWYAIw8rA.jpeg
 
How come "he is not even gay"? The guy worked as a male striper and a hooker for 2 years before making porn. He also fucked many guys on camera and bottomed quite easily. Please stop that "gay for pay" nonsense...
Malik bottomed before?
I looked through BoyfriendTV and couldn't find any of his bottoming scenes.
 
Malik is definitely straight but he definitely cares for gays because he knows his target audience really well and knows what demographic supports him the most financially. Let’s end this narrative that just because someone is gay for pay doesn’t mean that they have this intention for scamming gays. Malik have delivered whatever was asked even something as big as bottoming which didn’t seem possible to happen an year ago.

Your comment is polite and I appreciate your view and tone. As you've said: G4P inclination/availability doesn't turn a performer into a scammer, and I believe Malik is 100% legit.

Still I wanted to say (not just to you but to all reading):

Malik is fully grown man, but he is still young. In an interview I saw, he said he's "curious" and - I may be wrong - some people here mentioned interviews that he said he was bi (or it might be something he said on social media).

So I'd appreciate if people tried to quit this labeling either by trying to put him in a box and let him be, or by trying to use whatever is his sexual orientation against him.

First, he's an adult entertainer. His job is to entertain us and I believe he has accomplished that better than most, especially if we take in consideration his contemporary porn colleagues.

Second, if he's bisexual, it's perfectly normal if he currently has a girlfriend and is vacationing with her in Europe. He may marry a woman, have kids with her, and die never having another spouse/partner in his whole life. He still should be considered bisexual if he has said he is bisexual.

I feel people's anxieties about sexual orientation often get in the way and they feel this unreasonable need to classify someone as either gay or straight, when in reality we have so many other orientations out there. Straight people having this black & white view doesn't surprise me the least, but I still find it strange that gay men so often try to erase bisexuality or poke fun that a John took it in the butt so he can't be 100% straight.

I'd say let's all just enjoy what Malik is offering us and leave the need to put a label on him in the past. If he says his orientation is "curious," let's respect that and save our opinions to ourselves. Some of you may not notice, but questioning labels might be hurtful to some people who are just simply reading this thread. Let's not do that and keep this space welcoming to all.
 
Your comment is polite and I appreciate your view and tone. As you've said: G4P inclination/availability doesn't turn a performer into a scammer, and I believe Malik is 100% legit.

Still I wanted to say (not just to you but to all reading):

Malik is fully grown man, but he is still young. In an interview I saw, he said he's "curious" and - I may be wrong - some people here mentioned interviews that he said he was bi (or it might be something he said on social media).

So I'd appreciate if people tried to quit this labeling either by trying to put him in a box and let him be, or by trying to use whatever is his sexual orientation against him.

First, he's an adult entertainer. His job is to entertain us and I believe he has accomplished that better than most, especially if we take in consideration his contemporary porn colleagues.

Second, if he's bisexual, it's perfectly normal if he currently has a girlfriend and is vacationing with her in Europe. He may marry a woman, have kids with her, and die never having another spouse/partner in his whole life. He still should be considered bisexual if he has said he is bisexual.

I feel people's anxieties about sexual orientation often get in the way and they feel this unreasonable need to classify someone as either gay or straight, when in reality we have so many other orientations out there. Straight people having this black & white view doesn't surprise me the least, but I still find it strange that gay men so often try to erase bisexuality or poke fun that a John took it in the butt so he can't be 100% straight.

I'd say let's all just enjoy what Malik is offering us and leave the need to put a label on him in the past. If he says his orientation is "curious," let's respect that and save our opinions to ourselves. Some of you may not notice, but questioning labels might be hurtful to some people who are just simply reading this thread. Let's not do that and keep this space welcoming to all.
I get where you’re coming from and I agree with your statement of not putting him in a box. But unless he himself doesn’t come out as Bi yet, he shouldn’t be referred as bi/gay for that matter. He has always said that he is straight everytime in interviews so I’m just saying what he is saying. But once he says that he is Bi then I will gladly say that he is bi. I don’t think I put him in a box in any way. I just referred to his sexual orientation as what he refers his sexual orientation himself.