Malik Delgaty

I think you mean they *waste* their effort and money on the production of pantomime cartoonish porn.
Right? And even the cartoonish tone aside, I never understood the appeal of such elaborate sets and scenarios. It makes it all look fake and uncomfortable, there's no suspension of disbelief whatsoever. And the godawful lighting makes everything look like a sitcom set. Sean Cody and Corbin Fisher showed that you don't need anything more than a simple bed or couch to make quality porn.
 
Just out of interest, how many here have an active subscription to Men.com? I know many (if not all) of the scenes end up appearing on pirate sites, but I find a subscription much more practical, giving full access to the whole catalogue in the highest quality possible with a search option and some other perks, and it helps pay the models and all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Galba
Just out of interest, how many here have an active subscription to Men.com? I know many (if not all) of the scenes end up appearing on pirate sites, but I find a subscription much more practical, giving full access to the whole catalogue in the highest quality possible with a search option and some other perks, and it helps pay the models and all.
I think it's not worth it. They release one decent scene a year, they have good models, but the camera angles, the shots, the acting, all of that is terrible. If you subscribe for Malik, I think his OF is better. I don't remember the last time a MEN scene turned me on, maybe it's just me.
 
GA6-QhkXkAAmKby

GA6-Q6aWMAMqbr9
 
It's not even that his cock is that big. It's that his erection is fucking rigid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3vil3y3
It's not even that his cock is that big. It's that his erection is fucking rigid.
Sometimes his cock seems huge, sometimes "only" big, maybe it depends on angles, partner and how hard he is...

But I can tell you if his fleshjack dildo is really a exact copy of his dick, then its really huge :D lol
(but I suspect they made it a bit bigger)