He hasn't chosen not to have sex with an entire race though he just chose white guys first. Unless you're talking about Asian men. Find it interesting you forgot to evem mention they existed whem you're making a point about racism.
Manuel ferrara appreciation
- Thread starter padpad
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2017
- Posts
- 292
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 4,323
- Points
- 413
- Location
- Ohio, United States
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
He never once said/mentioned he didnt want to have sex with an entire race or that he wouldn't have sex with the people on the bottom of that list. He ranked a couple of stars on handsomeness and the top just so happened to be white. Im black and i can tell you the bottom people on the list do not compare to the top of his list (for me at least). Now there are plenty of people of color that would easily compete with his top 5 but the ones he put, nah. Lets not assume things.
NightShark
Superior Member
masc4thanos
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2019
- Posts
- 806
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 12,068
- Points
- 313
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
It's not racism as much as someone prefering sex with men over women is not sexist. Also 10 specific men do not represent how someone sees 4 billion men. Please, do not assume that something objective like a list of 10 handsome men derives from racism. Not everything is racism. Also, definitely do not involve politics into sexual preference.
I’m just replying to this comment because I’m not looking for the og comment again. I don’t think the list derives from racism. But just in case, sexual racism is a thing. I saw a “it’s just a preference” comment and no sir, it is racist, it is in fact giving very implicit bias. We all need to decolonize ourselves, myself included. Anyways, long live Manuel Ferrara.
If you want a light read:
Is It Racist to Have a Racial Dating Preference?
That analogy is really ignorant. Sexuality is about sex (i.e., gender), so the preference of one sex or another is DEPENDENT on the gender. It is not in any way tied to race. People with racial preferences aren't indicating anything about their sexuality, just their racism.
Also, the poster provided a list of the men he found most and least attractive, so I think it's quite indicative of his views toward men in general. It's not even a dispute that men of color rank VERY LOW on his list and it's not just one man. I am pretty sure this guy is not the type to have a long list of black men as ex-boyfriends or even as hookups.
And how do you figure that sexual preference isn't political when there's whole Supreme Court cases involving the topic?
Also, the poster provided a list of the men he found most and least attractive, so I think it's quite indicative of his views toward men in general. It's not even a dispute that men of color rank VERY LOW on his list and it's not just one man. I am pretty sure this guy is not the type to have a long list of black men as ex-boyfriends or even as hookups.
And how do you figure that sexual preference isn't political when there's whole Supreme Court cases involving the topic?
So now a black man is excusing a white man's implicit racial bias? Oooooooooookay.
Look, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but it's not as if he were asked to rate a list of random guys. HE CHOSE THE GUYS HE RANKED. His preferences are crystal clear to anyone with an ability to notice more than the size of the guys' dicks or behinds.
Look, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but it's not as if he were asked to rate a list of random guys. HE CHOSE THE GUYS HE RANKED. His preferences are crystal clear to anyone with an ability to notice more than the size of the guys' dicks or behinds.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2017
- Posts
- 292
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 4,323
- Points
- 413
- Location
- Ohio, United States
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
NightShark
Superior Member
Yes, 3 boys (with 1 pair of twins) from his previous marriage and 1 girl with the current
Your whole comments are wild generalizations. I don't even know half of those men in his list so I can't tell who is or isn't poc. What I can tell is that from a comment with limited context like a list of 10 men (not 10.000) ranked by their beauty you were able to learn that this guy hated people of color and had no romantic history with black people. All these from a list saying "I find Henry Cavill hot, X actor not as much", who X actor might have just happened to be black. Like I said, Not everything has to do with race and in this particular case, even if that person was racist, that list would not be enough to support it, hence was I said about generalization.
Racism is a thing, but not everything is racism. With that said, I will answer no further to this topic so that the thread won't deviate further from it's purpose.
longstroke7
Mythical Member
I'm Black and fuck, please take your argument to your PMs.
This thread is about my guy Manuel tearing up hot women and making them go nuts
This thread is about my guy Manuel tearing up hot women and making them go nuts
So then, you admit your ignorance on this issue by admitting that you don't even know the race of the individuals involved? Please, before you engage in a debate, know the facts first.
You apparently don't understand that the man in question provided the list. He wasn't asked to rank a random list of men, or asked to choose names of men from a hat. He had to consider in his own mind porn performers he found attractive and those he did not. He assigned the numbers to indicate his level of attraction (or the models' level of attractiveness to him). All I pointed out in response to his selections and rankings is that he appears to have an implicit racial bias. He named more than one black or Latinx performer and not even one of them received a favorable rating, whereas all the models with favorable ratings were white. I can logically deduce from both his selections and his ratings that race is a part of his preference. If pointing that out makes you uncomfortable, maybe you should ask yourself why.
You apparently don't understand that the man in question provided the list. He wasn't asked to rank a random list of men, or asked to choose names of men from a hat. He had to consider in his own mind porn performers he found attractive and those he did not. He assigned the numbers to indicate his level of attraction (or the models' level of attractiveness to him). All I pointed out in response to his selections and rankings is that he appears to have an implicit racial bias. He named more than one black or Latinx performer and not even one of them received a favorable rating, whereas all the models with favorable ratings were white. I can logically deduce from both his selections and his ratings that race is a part of his preference. If pointing that out makes you uncomfortable, maybe you should ask yourself why.
NightShark
Superior Member
I wonder why Manuel never participated in any of the 42 Brazzers live shows. Ramon Nomar was the one who participated in most of those.
You can’t be mad at what the man finds attractive although it seems the best porn stars are at the bottom of his list…Let’s just say if there was a two man 1 woman threesome with Manuel Ferrara and Steele, Manuel will be by himself…There’s absolutely no comparison between the two… If women are fake moaning and groaning with other male poem stars then u best believe they are being fake with Manuel…Just saying…
I'm not mad at all. I was making an observation. Other people, however, seemed to take offense at my observation 
Similar threads
- Sticky
