The fact that in thread "Measured porn stars" argument "this guy looks like 8 inches in that one video" beats every single measurement never ceases to amaze me.
And of course it's John E. Depth again. Because who else?
Apparently dude gets limp every single time ruler is next to his dick:
View attachment 25186391
Even though i don't know how people look at all this veins popping and think "yeah, he is not fully hard". And surprice, even from such angle, where tape goes diagonally, he is 8":
View attachment 25186561
If he was actually 8", from such angle he would be easily measured as 8.5" or even more. But nope. Also, take a look how much first inch bigger than last one:
View attachment 25186711
Yes, first inch is 1.5 times longer than last one. Just for fun, using first inch as reference, he would be 406 / 63 = 6.44"
Using second inch - 406 / 58 = 7"
Using third inch - 406 / 55 = 7.38"
Using fourth inch - 406 / 52 = 7.81" etc
Point is, since tape goes diagonally compared to his dick, he can't be 8". So 7.5" looks completely fair in this case.
His other measurement follows the pattern. Only this time, he is 7.75" when tape yet again goes diagonally (admittedly with less so than previous image):
View attachment 25186861
He is actually 7.5" in this one (keep in mind, tape is still goes diagonally, so he won't be 8" even if he somehow "straightens" his dick):
View attachment 25186871
Or look at this. Yet again he is not even 7.75" with diagonal tape:
View attachment 25188151
And then there these three images. First two don't show where tape starts (interesting how he measures 8" only when we don't see start of the tape, what a coincidence!) and the third one is obvious photoshop:
View attachment 25187091 View attachment 25187101 View attachment 25187111
So why? Why John E. Depth must be 8"? Because he somehow "looks like it"? Why such argument has any weight in thread about measurements? And why some people are so eager to throw away every measurement that doesn't suit their estimations?
I noticed one thing looking through the thread. For some reason, some people think that holy trinity Wesley Pipes - Rico Strong - John E. Depth can't be anything less than 8". They are not only ones, but it's especially irritable when they are have at least somewhat reliable estimations, not just usual "he MUST be THAT size because this is what he looks like".
And of course problem is not specifically Depth. The problem is that if we can just throw away all measurements for him "because he is not fully hard", we must as well do the same for rest of the guys.
Looking through the last pages, i see the usual claims - Rocco is 7x6, Manuel is 6.5x6.1, i suspect Prince will be 7x6 any day now, and the last logical step would be Lex at 8.25x5.5 yet again. Might as well claim that Shane is longer than 7.5" since insertable length of dildo apparently means nothing.
Justin Slayer doesn't have a single measurement. AFAIK, nobody did the same job with him like sdp did with Mandingo either. Claiming that he is 7.25" is rather bold statement. Using him as reference for Depth is very questionable choice.