Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
appeal to popularity? ok listen i did multiple pixel scaling hes between 8.4 to 8.5 thats it
when i say multiple i mean multiple he falls between fifteen or sixteen mm @Ocine thoughts you seem competent
Attachments
You're not understanding how these cameras work. Her arm being behind him absolutely makes a difference.
There is always forced perspective going on even with the simplest of cameras let alone the cameras they use in porn with fish eye lenses and what not.
And the pics you're referring to put Danny D at 8.35 NOT 8.5 and 8.35 is only .10 away from 8.25 so it's not worth arguing over.
And lastly your pic of her arm against Danny D is rubbish because of the aforementioned forearm forced perspective and the fact that we have NO idea how long her forearm is in that pic and NO we can't go off of averages.
There is always forced perspective going on even with the simplest of cameras let alone the cameras they use in porn with fish eye lenses and what not.
And the pics you're referring to put Danny D at 8.35 NOT 8.5 and 8.35 is only .10 away from 8.25 so it's not worth arguing over.
And lastly your pic of her arm against Danny D is rubbish because of the aforementioned forearm forced perspective and the fact that we have NO idea how long her forearm is in that pic and NO we can't go off of averages.
fordonfire
Admired Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Posts
- 1,655
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 992
- Points
- 443
- Location
- California (United States)
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
the extremely distorted lenses seem to have become the norm whether its professional or amateur...almost makes you miss the old days of VHS and dial-up downloads and people being allowed to be average
TinyPrincess
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Posts
- 16,041
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 31,861
- Points
- 368
- Location
- Copenhagen (Capital Region, Denmark)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Spot on. I miss old school porn.
again you are missing a vital point of this the side of her forearm is upbeside his member from what i under force perspective occurs when something is away from an object. but hes physically ontop of her arm even its not the complete thing hes hitting the of arm that side of her arm is towards the angle aswell also we know how long her arm is goldzilla i went over this
Its not side by side. Her arm is half way behind his dick.
If they were side by side you would be able to see her entire arm.
Her arm is slightly behind his dick and therefore farther away from the camera.
If they were side by side you would be able to see her entire arm.
Her arm is slightly behind his dick and therefore farther away from the camera.
ye her elbow on his legs and the camera is there showing the side of her arm one side not the whole thing but danny d is touching her arm you cant achieve force perspective if the object is literally within range that point is not valid unless one side of her fore arm is shorter
like i obviously know that apart of her arm is not in the shot hes measuring up against her forearm it really doesnt matter if her whole arm is in the shot unless one part of her forearm is shorter @JGUIDO
to put it simply danny d is measuring against one side of her forearm im not measuring her arm but her forearm and hes directly shown to be on top of a portion of her forearm the length would not change im not measuring girth
Take my foolish advice give up...u ain't neva gonna be right on here my guy
unless these camera bros can literally break the laws of physics idk what to say
i starting to believe it like literally im not undermining anyone but still some how im the bad guy
