Ok im sure your right but its the most likely reason for charmings weak erections, I mean pornstars arnt famous for looking after themselves.
post a vid that you think represents him well. i just got a bunch of various black guys when i googled him.
Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
Ok im sure your right but its the most likely reason for charmings weak erections, I mean pornstars arnt famous for looking after themselves.
post a vid that you think represents him well. i just got a bunch of various black guys when i googled him.
post a vid that you think represents him well. i just got a bunch of various black guys when i googled him.[/QUOTE]
This scene should do
http://www.xvideos.com/video24287073/redhead_enjoys_bbc
This scene should do
http://www.xvideos.com/video24287073/redhead_enjoys_bbc
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2005
- Posts
- 3,312
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 6,691
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Melbourne Australia
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
This scene should do
http://www.xvideos.com/video24287073/redhead_enjoys_bbc[/QUOTE]
8 at most 5 circ
Probably the most reliant studies I know of when it comes to clinical standards (i.e. chemically induced erections)
Wessels (1996) in the US: 5.08" nbpel
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8709382?dopt=Abstract
Schneider (2001) in Germany: 5.70" bpel
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11182344?dopt=Abstract
Sengezer (2002) in Turkey: 5.01" nbpel
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12068220 (though you won't find the data in the abstract)
Habous (2015) in Saudi Arabia: 4.93" nbpel and 5.64" bpel
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25904106
In general the data seems to be pretty much consistent (about 5" nbpel and 5.7" bpel)
edit:
the meta analysis you linked used Wessels nbpel data and said it was bpel. Makes me wonder if they made that mistake with other studies aswell (besides those you mentioned). So the meta analysis is 100% unreliable.
Last edited:
8 at most 5 circ[/QUOTE]
Yeah 8" is also my guess and slightly over 5" in girth maybe 5.25"
Does anyone know who this actor is ? and/or have an estimate for his size nbp length and girth ?
Dick girth pic comparison based on female hand ? http://imgur.com/a/JVIYj
https://www.vporn.com/interracial/hirsute-twat-gets-rammed-with-a-bbc/1648774/
I estimate around 7.25 nbp length by 6.25 girth based on her grip around his shaft and also based on the fact she appears a fair bit taller than the typical females they cast in the US.
Dick girth pic comparison based on female hand ? http://imgur.com/a/JVIYj
https://www.vporn.com/interracial/hirsute-twat-gets-rammed-with-a-bbc/1648774/
I estimate around 7.25 nbp length by 6.25 girth based on her grip around his shaft and also based on the fact she appears a fair bit taller than the typical females they cast in the US.
I agree with the numbers Snakebyte showed in post #7019 above based on measurements on drug induced erections. Other measurements based on erections by self stimulation and flaccid stretched length are not a good guide as most men won't be a full erection in a lab setting while being measured with a ruler. Also I have read elsewhere that a lot of men have a longer erect length than they do flaccid stretched length.
Also it is important to take into account most men that would volunteer to be measured must be more confident with their size. I would assume men who know they have small penises generally would not volunteer to participate in such medical surveys. This in turn would inflate the true drug induced erect worldwide average.
However I also think men who are larger in size are probably more confident and more sexually active. Therefore I would think that women on average encounter men who are above 5 nbp length 5.7 bp length more often than the statistics would assume.
Can you show me the link ?
That is something I would like to read hopefully you have a reliable source.
That study assumes that the heights listed on iafd for both male and female performers are accurate. I don't know how accurate they are.
Even if the figures are accurate, the figures are the average height of the performers industry wide. It does not the isolate big dick or monster cock genre, and that is the genre where they may use smaller actresses.
The study also states that '' At 117 pounds, the average female performer is a considerable 48 pounds under the national average for women ". That would imply that on average the actress may have smaller frames and a smaller bone structure (hands, face etc.)
The study also states that '' At 117 pounds, the average female performer is a considerable 48 pounds under the national average for women ". That would imply that on average the actress may have smaller frames and a smaller bone structure (hands, face etc.)
I'm still of the belief that it's the other way around, unless you just pull really lightly on your flaccid or it's tensed up. That is after all the same "material" that your erection has to work with and should have the same limitation in that particular area. It's the same reason you're probably not going to find anyone who is shorter while being stretched in a pump or extender than they are when erect. Not to say it's always the case, but with that issue being dick-size-related, you probably run into a lot of that same old "I'm huge but I can't show you right now.", and guys who just don't want to be confronted with the truth.
True, and I don't think we'd find many to argue that the monster dick porn girls were anywhere near average female dimensions. I suspect that the ones they use the most are probably small enough to draw stares and stuff in public for it (unless people assume they're kids).
Lastly- Be wary of sex related info coming from Huffington Post or dailymail.co.uk. They seem to be really quick to jump on those "A new study finds that..." topics and were some of the main promoters of the 13.5 inch world's largest penis fraud.
Take Care
PS- To avoid short-changing the guys, they should be allowed to do the pulling on their own flaccid while being measured by staff during those stretched tests (just make sure it takes place at an actual doctor's office or hospital
). A mechanical stretching device with a regulated pull force would be the ideal."Also I have read elsewhere that a lot of men have a longer erect length than they do flaccid stretched length."
Im longer erect than flaccid stretched. that seems like a really odd form of measurement... why would you use that were is it from/ what is it for?
Im longer erect than flaccid stretched. that seems like a really odd form of measurement... why would you use that were is it from/ what is it for?
Im longer erect than flaccid stretched. that seems like a really odd form of measurement... why would you use that were is it from/ what is it for?[/QUOTE]
They use it as a form of measurement to estimate men's actual penis erect length as a man's flaccid stretched length is meant to be pretty close to their actual erect length. I am under the expression in a clinical setting enough pressure on average won't be used extending the penis to give a man's full length, which is something researchers have also stated may happen themselves.
''Stretched flaccid length appears to be an excellent estimate of erect penile length, which for some individuals presenting to clinical settings, may indicate that it may not be necessary to measure erect length as well as flaccid size. However, there was greater variability in the measures, which suggests less reliability. This was found by Chen et al. [30] who reported that a minimal tension force of ≈450 g during stretching of the penis was required to reach a full potential erection length and that the stretching forces exerted by a urologist in their clinical setting were experimentally shown to be significantly less than the pressure required. This may account for a discrepancy observed in three out four of our present studies in Table 1, which measured stretched and erect length simultaneously and found that the erect length was longer than the stretched flaccid length. There is therefore a greater risk of bias in measuring the stretched length if insufficient pressure is applied and the greatest need for training and measuring inter-rater reliability."
source http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full
They use it as a form of measurement to estimate men's actual penis erect length as a man's flaccid stretched length is meant to be pretty close to their actual erect length. I am under the expression in a clinical setting enough pressure on average won't be used extending the penis to give a man's full length, which is something researchers have also stated may happen themselves.
''Stretched flaccid length appears to be an excellent estimate of erect penile length, which for some individuals presenting to clinical settings, may indicate that it may not be necessary to measure erect length as well as flaccid size. However, there was greater variability in the measures, which suggests less reliability. This was found by Chen et al. [30] who reported that a minimal tension force of ≈450 g during stretching of the penis was required to reach a full potential erection length and that the stretching forces exerted by a urologist in their clinical setting were experimentally shown to be significantly less than the pressure required. This may account for a discrepancy observed in three out four of our present studies in Table 1, which measured stretched and erect length simultaneously and found that the erect length was longer than the stretched flaccid length. There is therefore a greater risk of bias in measuring the stretched length if insufficient pressure is applied and the greatest need for training and measuring inter-rater reliability."
source http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full
Tyoically stretched flaccid is longer, but it can be the other way around if not stretched out fully or if the person has a longer than normal penis head, because that is the one area that does not stretch out flaccid
Sauerkraut
Worshipped Member
Bel Gris measuring and comparing, along the side of his upward curve
https://mobile.twitter.com/ianthetall/status/890599486321557504
https://mobile.twitter.com/ianthetall/status/890599486321557504
Attachments
Sauerkraut
Worshipped Member
Didn't Bel Gris himself disclose that he was some much smaller size and give an actual number a while back?
Can anyone well endowed comment on how accurate the above poster was talking about their size of 7.5 - 8 length and an average of 6.25 up to 6.5 girth being able to bring women to really intense orgasms in as little as 10 to an average of 30 seconds. Was the above poster trolling or being truthful ?
That's about what I figured. I think if a guy were really determined to show his maximum length in a stretched measurement, you'd get something slightly higher than his erection (at least equal). It wouldn't make sense for the erection to create something that wasn't there like it does for girth.
When you reach 500 posts you are awarded an LPSG "translation algorithm" so you don't have to ask stuff like that.
