the remote is the time warner remote 1056B01 it measures 8.9"
Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
the part of the remote that is left is less than 1/8th of the total remote size it would be less than an inch.
Conclusion: Wesley Pipes is 8.0 at least
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Posts
- 2,875
- Media
- 12
- Likes
- 2,152
- Points
- 273
- Location
- Athens (Attica, Greece)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
very funny cause I did this before and left part is about 1/7.5 of remote lenght so conclusion is wrong
It is
I agree. At the least if his thing is legit then I count Pipes based on that legit side measurement. 8.2 or 8.3 inches.
It is obvious now that Rokid discounts all top side measurements like these below. Which is fine it is just his way.
and that in doing so he discounts typically 0.5 to 0.70 inches of a penis that exists.
He also has a very weird and strict criteria on where to start his top measurement from like in this photo. It is obvious by looking at the first white line (where he says the measurement should start) that there is an obvious degree of Pipes dick that is being ignored and this is most evident if we follow the line to the end where it is obvious more of his penis goes till his balls and then some.
I mean the first white line he draws that goes across the buttons is where he claims the LEGIT ABOVE TOP measurement starts. But who is the King that says his TOP legit measurement begins at the first white line on the buttons and not the second??
But where the second line is is NOT his fat pad!!! That distance between his first and second white line is NOT the fat pad so why the is he discounting it???
But ultimately I think one of us needs to get in on this Pixel work stuff to check ourselves. He may have a bias and we may have a bias additional heads need to analyze this. A person could lie etc... Also need to check to see if pixels work with all things. It seems believable but I am no math expert.
@RokiD work is very solid. Where we differ is on what type of measurement measures the full erect length of the NON BONE PRESSED ERECT penis.
We are consistently getting 0.5 inches larger than whatever measurements @RokiD is getting i.e.
Wesley Pipes 7.6 or 7.7 inches from that measurement following Rokid criteria. +0.50 inches or 0.60 inches of the base that attaches and is not present from Rokid type measurement= 8.2 inches NBPEL, his BP would then be closer to 8.5 inches since he is such a low body fat %. Can´t be over a 0.4 inch fat pad.
Likewise Lex Steele is seeming to come back at 8.15 inches +0.5 inches we think or 0.25 for the balls and we get 8.65 inches for Lex or 8.4 inches.
Mandingo is 8.75 inches last I checked from Rokid pixel work and his opinion. 8.75+0.5 inches= 9.25 inches for Mandingo.
I think adding 0.25 to 0.5 inches for the balls makes sense. However, with Pipes our side measurement is telling us 8.3 inches and that is a legit top side measurement. Going by the harsh criteria Rokid has then I guess Pipes really is ONLY 7.6 or 7.7 inches. I however, do not accept that criteria because to me there is so much more of his obvious penis that gets sucked and inserted in porn scenes.
@anton1, @GreekAndy, @strivingforperfection, @Frightmare, @GorillaHorse, @vikingking1000
Assuming his Pixel stuff is 100% truthful then it looks that our argument with him is on him discounting obvious existing PENIS that exists outside of the fat pad. He sees it and throws it away as ¨side measurement not legit¨even though that is part of the physical penis that is NON BONE PRESSED. He did the same with the Pipes measurement like this below.
That gap between the two white lines is NOT fat pad, so what is it??? It attaches to the base of the penis it is his penis. It is REAL LENGTH. I literally do not see how one could make a medical argument against that NOT being part of his NON BONE PRESSED ERECT LENGTH.
See my post #12221.
Next is for one of us to get in on this Pixel stuff to double check his numbers. Not calling him a liar but two sets of eyes one from each camp wouldn´t hurt.
Yeah I was hoping for evidence or explanation of how he split it in 7.5 parts or did he just guess?
Girth is impossible to estimate unlike length unless we have a girth measurement. This hand stuff is just so hard I feel like essentially you end up in a range of 0.5 to 0.75 inch differential. Who have we seen girth measured? Shane Diesel, and Ramon right? Then they and obviously Shorty Mac are the ceiling but nobody knows what Shorty mac is.
technically pencil dick I would think would be below average girth. Average girth last I checked is in the 4.6 inch to 4.8 inch range. male penis girth varies a lot more than length it seems and across all races and everywhere. But last I checked many guys are in that 4.7 to 5.0 inch range. He seems average girth or lower end of average definitely sub 5.0 inch girth. So yeah with his length totally has that pencil look.
wonder if he has ever rocked it and said ´take my pencil bitch´. lol or something about taking long dick.
Yh I'm still sticking with my same estimate. 9nbp for dingo and 8.4 - 8.5 lex. We need them at the same angle
pg 609, post ,#12177
he told me this when I asked about the pixel question stuff.
Assuming he is being 100% honest. And that remote is actually 8.9 inches and not 9.0 inches (as it it was listed in pornstar measurements and as it was when I looked it up on Amazon). Then I can only suspect that his intense criteria for where to begin the penis measurement from the top is why he is constantly getting measurements that we believe are 0.5 inches or sometimes more shorter than what we think. I.E., listing Mandingo at 8.7 or so when we all saw him measured at 9.0 to 9.2 inches via variation.
Or giving Pipes 7.6 inches BP MAX (lol) when we all see 8.2 to 8.4... But based off his Pixel thing he is telling us that Pipes is 8.2 or 8.3 from the side measurement but that, the length of Pipes penis in that picture is not his REAL length and that Pipes must be measured 0.6 or 0.7 inches less than that. Hence we get that very odd picture where he draws the two white lines and declares as King where it correctly starts.
look to be fair the above measurement is good but i would suspect the total length of the remote is not equally distant from the camera so i used this picture for more accurate results it is exactly the same remote
the red line is 491 pix and the yellow is 570 pix so if the remote is 8.9" his dick is exactly 7.66" if the remote is 9" like some users claim he would be 7.75"
First line is where measurments to the side starts and it have nothing to do with fat pad or bone pressed.
The second line is there his nbp starts cause remote touch his thigh/groin here, not fat pad/base.
i believe everyone here is estimating size based on this type of measurement even strivingIt is
I agree. At the least if his thing is legit then I count Pipes based on that legit side measurement. 8.2 or 8.3 inches.
It is obvious now that Rokid discounts all top side measurements like these below. Which is fine it is just his way.
and that in doing so he discounts typically 0.5 to 0.70 inches of a penis that exists.
He also has a very weird and strict criteria on where to start his top measurement from like in this photo. It is obvious by looking at the first white line (where he says the measurement should start) that there is an obvious degree of Pipes dick that is being ignored and this is most evident if we follow the line to the end where it is obvious more of his penis goes till his balls and then some.
![how-to-measure-you-penis-size.png]()
![sHvhVNx.png]()
![Measure-Penis-Size.png]()
I mean the first white line he draws that goes across the buttons is where he claims the LEGIT ABOVE TOP measurement starts. But who is the King that says his TOP legit measurement begins at the first white line on the buttons and not the second??
![20171209_030051-%E2%80%94-kopia-3-jpg.908031]()
But where the second line is is NOT his fat pad!!! That distance between his first and second white line is NOT the fat pad so why the is he discounting it???
But ultimately I think one of us needs to get in on this Pixel work stuff to check ourselves. He may have a bias and we may have a bias additional heads need to analyze this. A person could lie etc... Also need to check to see if pixels work with all things. It seems believable but I am no math expert.
![]()
![Qc1GLpL.jpg]()
@RokiD work is very solid. Where we differ is on what type of measurement measures the full erect length of the NON BONE PRESSED ERECT penis.
We are consistently getting 0.5 inches larger than whatever measurements @RokiD is getting i.e.
Wesley Pipes 7.6 or 7.7 inches from that measurement following Rokid criteria. +0.50 inches or 0.60 inches of the base that attaches and is not present from Rokid type measurement= 8.2 inches NBPEL, his BP would then be closer to 8.5 inches since he is such a low body fat %. Can´t be over a 0.4 inch fat pad.
Likewise Lex Steele is seeming to come back at 8.15 inches +0.5 inches we think or 0.25 for the balls and we get 8.65 inches for Lex or 8.4 inches.
Mandingo is 8.75 inches last I checked from Rokid pixel work and his opinion. 8.75+0.5 inches= 9.25 inches for Mandingo.
I think adding 0.25 to 0.5 inches for the balls makes sense. However, with Pipes our side measurement is telling us 8.3 inches and that is a legit top side measurement. Going by the harsh criteria Rokid has then I guess Pipes really is ONLY 7.6 or 7.7 inches. I however, do not accept that criteria because to me there is so much more of his obvious penis that gets sucked and inserted in porn scenes.
@anton1, @GreekAndy, @strivingforperfection, @Frightmare, @GorillaHorse, @vikingking1000
so maybe there is no downplaying here you just misunderstood our posts
no one said wesley or mandingo are 7.6 or 8.75 BONE PRESSED
also if the remote was placed at the first line it would be higher than the rest of his dick and would be angled/not in contact with full length of the dick
but you can see that that is roughly in line with nbp. Can you explain to me how you counted the pixels?
sorry i don't know what you mean exactly here, when you draw a line it just show you the number of pixels that this line covered if that what you mean
Okay I see the problem here. I know you will say Im making excuses but just look. In the picture youre analyzing the remote starts at the center and its at a diagonal it is ending almost at the side of his head. That means it takes longer distance to cover same area (basic geometry, than a straight line. If the remote were straight on his dick, his dick would go a bit further up the remote
Look at this pic that was criticized for being side from 1st line, which is the same exact place the remote starts in the other picture you are accepting as legit
Here remote is perfectly straight, (diagonal in pic but perfectly straight in relation to his dick) and you can see his dick is reaching further. It doesn't matter that it is to the side, since the 1st line that was drawn to show where it lines up to is in the same place as where you accepted starting the measurement in the other "on top" pic.
This on top pic here now (the one I am saying is at a diagonal and robbing a bit of length.) You can see that the starting point here of the remote is the SAME as in the other pic and the dick is not reaching as far. Again, it doesn't matter that the other pic starts at the side since a straight line was drawn across dick (the 1st one) was drawn to represent where it starts. This is also why I asked why are people starting from 2nd line in that pic. What else could possibly be going on but what I say (the diagonal is robbing length here slightly?)
Both pics start at same point, that is inarguable, so what is going on?
