Measured porn stars??

First off this picture is childish and gay.
bbc is closer to camera above swc and it gives huge difference in camera lens
also there is no prove that bigger is better, we are looking for penis measurments here and dont judge this cock is better cause is bigger or that cock is worse cause its smaller, everything is relative and not for everyone so there is no point to admire longer or thicker penis the most improtant thing is that penis works - good erection and good sensation not enormous size alone
 
I dont agree with adding 0.5" out of nowhere, its called overplaying - the most common thing
So if I take picture of my hand in the middle of the penis and analyze pixels with measuring my palm lenght - result I will get will equal my actual penis size then I suppose to add another 0.5" to make everything fit into your perception of penis sizes?
Any error in pixel analysis occur by wrong angeles so If photo is good-neutral angle then it is +/- 1/8" difference, not more

I'm just not understanding how Lex was measured from the side at 9.1-9.2 inches in his prime and guys on here saying he's 8 inches in his prime lol no he's not,when has anyone lost a full inch from a side measurement??? There's no way he'd lost an full inch and you know it
 
I'm just not understanding how Lex was measured from the side at 9.1-9.2 inches in his prime and guys on here saying he's 8 inches in his prime lol no he's not,when has anyone lost a full inch from a side measurement??? There's no way he'd lost an full inch and you know it

We already proove alot of time that the picture where hes measured on a side its not a legit side pictures, because the base of the tape start far from his dick, and more much on the leg... its create an angle.

I think SDP or someonelse took the same kind of picture with an object, and there a big difference when measuring on side, while the measure tape touch the penis, and measuring on side, while the measure tape don't touch the penis...
 
Is that a combination of over 7'' length and 5.5'' girth together?
Or either 7'' length or 5.5'' girth?

According to this site https://calcsd.bitballoon.com/full, using the [calcSD Average (NBP)], a combination of 7'' NBP and 5.5'' girth is exactly 2 times the total volume of the average penis and around bigger than 99.97% of the male population.

Fun site :D
 
We already proove alot of time that the picture where hes measured on a side its not a legit side pictures, because the base of the tape start far from his dick, and more much on the leg... its create an angle.

I think SDP or someonelse took the same kind of picture with an object, and there a big difference when measuring on side, while the measure tape touch the penis, and measuring on side, while the measure tape don't touch the penis...
don't even bother he won't listen to anything that suggest he is not as big as he thinks if you disagree with him then you are wrong
 
They have bigger cocks. Get over it

from what I have seen in studies and evidence. Only subsaharan west african blacks. Them and northern and central european men. Personally I do think there is likely some ethnic or subrace group within black and white population and whatever group that is developed larger dicks. It is a big stretch to tell me or anyone with a brain that men all over the world regardless of race are the same size range and that there are just as many mandingo and lexington steele and jason brown, type asian, korean, indian, and native indian penises walking around.

but at same type the evidence shows that the average black guy is not packing a 'bbc'. but i have a hard time believing that white and blacks do not score on the larger side on average.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LutherCorps
from what I have seen in studies and evidence. Only subsaharan west african blacks. Them and northern and central european men. Personally I do think there is likely some ethnic or subrace group within black and white population and whatever group that is developed larger dicks. It is a big stretch to tell me or anyone with a brain that men all over the world regardless of race are the same size range and that there are just as many mandingo and lexington steele and jason brown, type asian, korean, indian, and native indian penises walking around.

but at same type the evidence shows that the average black guy is not packing a 'bbc'. but i have a hard time believing that white and blacks do not score on the larger side on average.
Can you provide scientific proof for your claim for subsaharan west africans? With scientific I don't mean some random website like the world map.
 
Can you provide scientific proof for your claim for subsaharan west africans? With scientific I don't mean some random website like the world map.

I will later. Curious do you think there are as many indian, asian penises that are as big as the big white and black guys?
 
I will later. Curious do you think there are as many indian, asian penises that are as big as the big white and black guys?
But please not Richard Lynn. The studies Lynn used didn't use any standard measurement method at all. It's just a collection of data that actually can't be compared since it doesn't follow the same standards.
Concerning your question, there are 3 separate studies made in South-Korea and all 3 show about the same average as other studies in the western world. A study in India had the same average as other studies. If there is a difference it's nutrition, not race. I mean, check the effects of soy. And then check the difference in height, facial hair etc of Asian Americans and Asians in Asia. And don't judge the difference because of porn since in Japan for instance small penises are chosen for porn intentionally.
It doesn't matter what I think. I rely on scientific facts rather than opinions.
Do you have a proof that say the opposite ?
In fact I do:
Ajmani M, Jain S, Saxena S. Anthropometric study of male external genitalia of 320 healthy Nigerian adults. Anthropol Anz 1985; 43: 179–186
The average wasn't different from studies in several other countries. And last time I checked Nigeria was an huge part of the sub-saharan western Africa.
 
Last edited:
But please not Richard Lynn. The studies Lynn used didn't use any standard measurement method at all. It's just a collection of data that actually can't be compared since it doesn't follow the same standards.
Concerning your question, there are 3 separate studies made in South-Korea and all 3 show about the same average as other studies in the western world. A study in India had the same average as other studies. If there is a difference it's nutrition, not race. I mean, check the effects of soy. And then check the difference in height, facial hair etc of Asian Americans and Asians in Asia. And don't judge the difference because of porn since in Japan for instance small penises are chosen for porn intentionally.
It doesn't matter what I think. I rely on scientific facts rather than opinions.

In fact I do:
Ajmani M, Jain S, Saxena S. Anthropometric study of male external genitalia of 320 healthy Nigerian adults. Anthropol Anz 1985; 43: 179–186
The average wasn't different from studies in several other countries. And last time I checked Nigeria was an huge part of the sub-saharan western Africa.
What about girth
 
Please let's just analyze dicks and not debate race or post pics that have nothing to do with thread. My opinion is blacks are bigger but only slightly on average with a lot of statistical overlap. Pics like that are made mainly for cuckold pathetic white guys to enjoy don't blame blacks for it.
 
But please not Richard Lynn. The studies Lynn used didn't use any standard measurement method at all. It's just a collection of data that actually can't be compared since it doesn't follow the same standards.
Concerning your question, there are 3 separate studies made in South-Korea and all 3 show about the same average as other studies in the western world. A study in India had the same average as other studies. If there is a difference it's nutrition, not race. I mean, check the effects of soy. And then check the difference in height, facial hair etc of Asian Americans and Asians in Asia. And don't judge the difference because of porn since in Japan for instance small penises are chosen for porn intentionally.
It doesn't matter what I think. I rely on scientific facts rather than opinions.

In fact I do:
Ajmani M, Jain S, Saxena S. Anthropometric study of male external genitalia of 320 healthy Nigerian adults. Anthropol Anz 1985; 43: 179–186
The average wasn't different from studies in several other countries. And last time I checked Nigeria was an huge part of the sub-saharan western Africa.

It's true studies don't show a difference. It's surprising they can't find more white guys over 8 besides Danny D though
 
  • Like
Reactions: TinyPrincess
It's true studies don't show a difference. It's surprising they can't find more white guys over 8 besides Danny D though

Well there is no need for white guys to be this big in porn, they don't have a stereotype to keep alive. So they are chosen with other parameters in mind. I don't think guys like Johnny sins or jean valjean with cocks in the range of 6 to 7 have anything to be jealous of, they are top class performers and can clearly get the job done and satisfy a woman. Hell Johnny sins is 11 years in porn , he must be doing something right. Even though that with porn standards in mind he is not that big. Anyway full disclosure I'm a bit biased in favour of my size range. But I had to be honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TinyPrincess