You only like people's posts when they agree with you, you are not intellectually honest. Meanwhile, I have been intellectually honest from the beginning. I disagreed with goldzilla that Mandingo was 9.5 and said no he's 9. I said Shane Diesel was only 7.5. I said Steve Holmes was only 7 ro 7,5 not 8+. I said Criss Strokes was 7 to 7.25 not 7.5 or 8. You liked my posts then. I like people's posts who make sense and use logic, not who always agree with me.
@Zaromski ,
@Lance Bass ,
@turooso etc actually use logic, not posting mumbo jumbo and committing logical fallacies.
I used to like your posts even though I didn't always agree. We agreed to disagree at times. So it's not because you disagree I have the problem. It is that your bias is more and more obvious over time. Just like RokiD. You guys always only focus on the least possible amount you can get someone within reason like you get points for reducing them. Sometimes it even goes beyond the point of reason. If you were honest, you would tell plas95 he's talking nonsense because you know he is, but now you play "who knows I can't say for sure about girth" game that contradicts what you earlier said. That is not the same as me changing my mind over someone's measurement, that is a flat out lie about you being able to tell girth or not. You are picking sides, not being honest.
You, Roki D, Plas95 etc are no different from the other side of guys who say Mandingo is 10, Manuel Ferrara is 7.5x6.5 etc. It is the same biased game, rather than attempting to seek truth. I'm tired of it. Respectful disagreement is important, but not when guys come in with obvious bias and try to cloak it in "my honest opinion."
