Measured porn stars??

That's a good point, how can John E Depth be 8'' if he was measured 8'' from the side. A proper NBP measurement on top definitely takes away length, how much might depend on how much fat they have in that area.

He’s not fully erect in those photos
 
E="cjcsurrow, post: 7604952, member: 999372"]Brand new jmac scene[/QUOTE]
Under 7? Or what?
 
The thing is Depth is not fully erect there as I’ve mentioned this time and time again
I have never seen him more veiny than this and he is clamping at base to hold more blood inside, if you are semi veins dont pop out like this
its pic from photoshoot not vid (they had time to get fully hard and choose best pictures) so you think they are so stupid to post only semi erect photos and never fully hard in porn where they rely on crazy numbers
 
  • Like
Reactions: sdp
I have never seen him more veiny than this and he is clamping at base to hold more blood inside, if you are semi veins dont pop out like this
its pic from photoshoot not vid (they had time to get fully hard and choose best pictures) so you think they are so stupid to post only semi erect photos and never fully hard in porn where they rely on crazy numbers

Lmao yes they post all kinds of dumb things in porn why wouldn’t they post a semi hard John E Depth? I dont think he was fully erect and if he was then you guys are right,but he just doesn’t look fully hard there
 
That's a good point, how can John E Depth be 8'' if he was measured 8'' from the side. A proper NBP measurement on top definitely takes away length, how much might depend on how much fat they have in that area.

proxy.php

359a5u1.jpg


jmac was measured cheating : measured from leg and ruler far from dick plus good camera angle and lex was measured 0.2" longer than jmac with same chating principles namely measured from leg and ruler far from dick plus good camera angle
but for you lex measurment was legit and jmac wasnt legit, for me non of them was legit and lex would be under 9" to the side if tape was right next to his dick with neutral angle like for example wesley pipes who was compared to remote was around 8.2" to the side but you will claim he is probably longer nbp on top than to the side
john e depth measured 8" to the side but you will still claim he is 8.25" on top nbp
View attachment 1272072

even if someone showed you legit nbp picture you would still think hes trolling/shortchanging him beacuse its not fit your ideology

proxy.php

He's 7-7.25. LOL at 6.75

based on what?
ye jmac is 7 and lex appears to be 0.25" longer
View attachment 1271648

1zq8xlu.jpg


Its so obvious there is a GIANT gap and this is NOT a flush measurement. Look at Depth NOT flush either. Pipes is measured flush
proxy.php

Lex is 8.25-8.5

Jmac is 7 what are you talking about?

we d
Rico isn’t under 8

most likely he is man. Pipes has quite a few measurements and all show him at 8.0 max, at the least 7.8 and at possibly most on a pumped measurement 8.2 but again pumped so subtract.

359a5u1.jpg


Pipes is longer than Rico so rico cant be 8.0 let alone over.
 
I think Chris had previously been estimated at 7.25” nbp, but I saw some analysis of him next to a monster can and some other energy drink that put him around 7” nbp. What I’m trying to figure out is how short he must me to look so long because he looks longer than that but the photos don’t lie.
He looks longer because he's a very thin dude. The camera captures contrasts like that. That same dick on a guy weighing 200 lbs with thick thighs wouldn't LOOK as impressive. Yes, his girlfriend would love it, but it's not the same on camera....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ready4more