michaelv_p on IG
- Thread starter Nyx24
- Start date
Jake_od
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2018
- Posts
- 32
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 292
- Points
- 88
- Location
- Melbourne (Victoria, Australia)
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
The larger bulge is actually the original. When shooting Michael I usually have to tone down the size of his natural bulge and/or smooth over VPL because Instagram will instantly remove images with prominent bulges, either assuming the model is aroused or because the AI will flag it as nudity. Discrepancies in pictures are because I like to keep a twitter and Instagram version of my work, because of course on twitter I can post unrestricted.
Nice to know. Do you mind sharing unedited versions here? And will you post uncensored images in any of your channels or is he going to?
Unrestricted for now, until the billionaire brat gets a bug up his ass about that. Thank you for the reply. Wow, that's the first time I've heard of having to shrink a bulge so you can post it online. lol Now I know why so many male models have their IG's removed, that naughty VPL.
I joined his OF last night and the first pic I saw I thought, "Oh that's gotta be Pshop enhanced.", and then I saw the video and that quickly changed my mind. He's a big boy.
Jake_od
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2018
- Posts
- 32
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 292
- Points
- 88
- Location
- Melbourne (Victoria, Australia)
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
oh he’s definitely big lol. It’s a running joke between us that whenever we are shooting the wrestling singlets it’s gonna take me ages to edit because I have to smooth over all the cock veins to make it postable. These days a large part of my editing process is reducing the ‘intensity’ of the bulge without making it an obvious blur. But it’s definitely an issue for large boys. For example, a certain brand I work with had a lawsuit against meta for the removal of their Instagram account on the basis of make nudity due to bulges. The model had to sign an affidavit stating that his bulge was naturally that large and he was not ‘aroused’, with proof provided if necessary, because the content had been removed on that basis. The brand was arguing that it was discrimination against men on an anatomical basis because women aren’t inhibited due to their genitals being internal. But it’s annoying because obviously culturally, a bikini and male underwear are equally modest, but Instagram’s AI can’t make context judgments like that because a penis is more obvious than a vagina while clothed.
Marco Tony
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2019
- Posts
- 3,919
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 50,091
- Points
- 358
- Location
- Montreal (Quebec, Canada)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
He showed the top of his hard shaft in one the videos and he is way bigger and thicker than I expected. Happy with his Onlyfans so far as he seems to be posting something every day.
Jake, I just want to ask one question. Was this one cropped?
![FjFxxDvVsAAAShP.jpg]( "FjFxxDvVsAAAShP.jpg")
He doesn't even show HALF of it and I was like, "OH MY GOD!" I will self combust at the full reveal.
Jake_od
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2018
- Posts
- 32
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 292
- Points
- 88
- Location
- Melbourne (Victoria, Australia)
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
We did this shoot a while ago before he made his onlyfans, but yes about half of his shaft is in it, though it was shot with the intention of cropping. But we will probably post it on my members only and his onlyfans in due course. A lot of our shoots have involved some level of nudity that has been cropped or censored. He raised with me many times that he was thinking of launching onlyfans across the time that we’ve been shooting, so we may end up creating some content specifically for it, or maybe one day some collab shoots.
I know that if he ever asks for feedback or suggestions on his onlyfans I will be straight in there with "More singlets please!"
