Most Perfect Male Ever?

[Rockford Tyson]

A lot of guys severely overrate themselves(the same is true for girls). I see all the time guys rating themselves 8/10, 9/10, ot even 10/10. The *reality* is that most people are 4/10 and 5/10. A guy that is 6/10 will already get some attention. Those are the guys that girls/gay/bi guys give that "second look".
A 7/10 guy is a genuinelly good-looking guy. The guy you see walking in the street in plain clothes and even if his hair is messy and he is just chilling you go:
"Wow, that is one good-looking motherf-ker."
Guys that are 8/10 are *very* good-looking guys. They are also quite rare. You can go days, weeks, or even months without seeing one. Most Hollywood leading men in their primes were 8/10. Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise and Ben Affleck were all 8/10 in their primes. (no, Brad Pitt is NOT a 10/10 or even 9/10 and there are many reasons for this).
Now, genuine 9/10 are in that "near perfect" category. Genuine 9/10 are extremely rare. And when I say "extremely", I actually mean it. It's not 1%. In fact, it's not even 1% of 1%, but significantly less than that. To be a genuine 9/10, you need all the following:
Perfect bone-structure.
Upper half of the face wider than lower part.
Mirror symmetry to both sides of the face.
Hunter's eyes(oblique eyes with full eyelid coverage)
High cheek bones.
Protruding jawline in profile
- Perfect centerdness and proportion of sino-labial cavity.
- Full lips.
- The Greek "golden ratio" between the eyes, nose, lips and eyes.
Warrior's skull. Skull that is flattened in profile.

There are very, very, VERY few men that can fullfill this profile. A genuine 9/10 is significantly more handsome than your typical male film star. Only the top 1-4% of male movie stars in the history of cinema are genuine 9/10. A genuine 9/10 would be someone like David Gandy or Sean O'Pry. Alain Delon in his prime would also be a 9/10 if it weren't for the fact that he is only 5/10.

So what about the mythical 10/10? No Human can be a true 10/10 because that requires a level of mathematical perfection in terms of symmetry, shape, balance, proportions and dimorphism(influence of hormones) that is impossible to be achieved. However, there is one guy that does come close to the mythical 10/10.

Meet Francisco Lachowski. He is a Brazilian male supermodel that has become a meme in the "looks maxing" communities as well as in the Red Pill communities for his unfathomable beauty and perfection. He makes other male supermodels look average. He is a 9.5-9.9/10. He excels in each and every one of the criteria of male beauty to a level that is almost impossible. In therwords of a famous esthetician that rates faces and overall bodies, he "broke the scale". Here is a video tribute to him,. and below a video showing giels in Paris almost sexually assaulting him. The comments from depressed straight boys watching him are hilarious:
"He won the genetic lottery and kept winning."
"It was over for us before it even began."
"The face. The hair. The body. The height. He is everything that we could ever dream of being."
"He mogs even other supermodels.

Then, there are the bitter, sarcastic comments, such as:
"Girls are drawn to him because they can see his his personality from a mile away."
"Just go the gym and take a shower, bro, and then you can be just like Chico."

I have ambivalent feelings towards Mr.Lachowski. On the one hand, I want to punch him for making me look like shit. Conversely, I want hold his hands and French kiss him. I guess it would boil down to:
"Do you want to be my boyfriend?"
Of course not."
"Well, FK you then. Die!
But besides sexual attraction, I am fascinated by him from purely a curiosity perpective. Looking at him is proof that Nature is capable of creating beautiful things it it wants to. It's like an art work created by Evolution. We are fascinated by people like him because it shows the pinnacle of genetic perfection of our species. But superb genes is not enough. His face and body also shows signs of a childhood free from infectionns, of superb health and sound development from an ealy age. I guess growing up playing soccer bare foot in Brazil and catching fish to eat with your bare hands(he is a fisher) and eating natural foods does mighty good for you:

Getting jumped by girls in Paris:

Breaking the scale of perfection:

 

[Kanye Okaye]

Who's reading all this?

Beauty is highly subjective anyway. I'd take Logan Lerman over this chico any day.

 

[Rockford Tyson]

Who's reading all this

Some of us actually went to school. I'm sorry. It's not a big deal for us.

"Beauty is highly subjective anyway. I'd take Logan Lerman over this chico any day."

Beauty is actually not that subjective. All attractive people have characteristics in common, such as superior facial symmetry and proportions. You'd know this if you actually read things since I explained it, but then you don't like to read things.

 

[Kanye Okaye]

Some of us actually went to school. I'm sorry. It's not a big deal for us.



Beauty is actually not that subjective. All attractive people have characteristics in common, such as superior facial symmetry and proportions. You'd know this if you actually read things since I explained it, but then you don't like to read things.

Lol butthurt much. "Some of us" is apparently just you, but sure I'll let you hold on to that superiority complex.

 

[Rockford Tyson]

Lol butthurt much. "Some of us" is apparently just you, but sure I'll let you hold on to that superiority complex.

LOL, you are the one that started with the nasty attitude from the start. What is the matter? You are upset that you can't live up to the standards of Chico? Don't get upset, weetheart. None of us can. Look, it's not that serious. Take it easy, seet cheeks.

 

[sdaly]

Beauty isn't really subjective. They've done cross-cultural studies where people from from different cultures are asked to pick out attractive faces (also from different cultures/races) and there is always general agreement on beauty. E.g., Europeans and South Asians agree on the attractiveness of people from Europe and people from south Asia.

 

[Rockford Tyson]

Beauty isn't really subjective. They've done cross-cultural studies where people from from different cultures are asked to pick out attractive faces (also from different cultures/races) and there is always general agreement on beauty. E.g., Europeans and South Asians agree on the attractiveness of people from Europe and people from south Asia.

Exactly. That dude is just delusional.

 

[Mickey Finn]

A lot of guys severely overrate themselves(the same is true for girls). I see all the time guys rating themselves 8/10, 9/10, ot even 10/10. The *reality* is that most people are 4/10 and 5/10. A guy that is 6/10 will already get some attention. Those are the guys that girls/gay/bi guys give that "second look".
A 7/10 guy is a genuinelly good-looking guy. The guy you see walking in the street in plain clothes and even if his hair is messy and he is just chilling you go:
"Wow, that is one good-looking motherf-ker."
Guys that are 8/10 are *very* good-looking guys. They are also quite rare. You can go days, weeks, or even months without seeing one. Most Hollywood leading men in their primes were 8/10. Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise and Ben Affleck were all 8/10 in their primes. (no, Brad Pitt is NOT a 10/10 or even 9/10 and there are many reasons for this).
Now, genuine 9/10 are in that "near perfect" category. Genuine 9/10 are extremely rare. And when I say "extremely", I actually mean it. It's not 1%. In fact, it's not even 1% of 1%, but significantly less than that. To be a genuine 9/10, you need all the following:
Perfect bone-structure.
Upper half of the face wider than lower part.
Mirror symmetry to both sides of the face.
Hunter's eyes(oblique eyes with full eyelid coverage)
High cheek bones.
Protruding jawline in profile
- Perfect centerdness and proportion of sino-labial cavity.
- Full lips.
- The Greek "golden ratio" between the eyes, nose, lips and eyes.
Warrior's skull. Skull that is flattened in profile.

There are very, very, VERY few men that can fullfill this profile. A genuine 9/10 is significantly more handsome than your typical male film star. Only the top 1-4% of male movie stars in the history of cinema are genuine 9/10. A genuine 9/10 would be someone like David Gandy or Sean O'Pry. Alain Delon in his prime would also be a 9/10 if it weren't for the fact that he is only 5/10.

So what about the mythical 10/10? No Human can be a true 10/10 because that requires a level of mathematical perfection in terms of symmetry, shape, balance, proportions and dimorphism(influence of hormones) that is impossible to be achieved. However, there is one guy that does come close to the mythical 10/10.

Meet Francisco Lachowski. He is a Brazilian male supermodel that has become a meme in the "looks maxing" communities as well as in the Red Pill communities for his unfathomable beauty and perfection. He makes other male supermodels look average. He is a 9.5-9.9/10. He excels in each and every one of the criteria of male beauty to a level that is almost impossible. In therwords of a famous esthetician that rates faces and overall bodies, he "broke the scale". Here is a video tribute to him,. and below a video showing giels in Paris almost sexually assaulting him. The comments from depressed straight boys watching him are hilarious:
"He won the genetic lottery and kept winning."
"It was over for us before it even began."
"The face. The hair. The body. The height. He is everything that we could ever dream of being."
"He mogs even other supermodels.

Then, there are the bitter, sarcastic comments, such as:
"Girls are drawn to him because they can see his his personality from a mile away."
"Just go the gym and take a shower, bro, and then you can be just like Chico."

I have ambivalent feelings towards Mr.Lachowski. On the one hand, I want to punch him for making me look like shit. Conversely, I want hold his hands and French kiss him. I guess it would boil down to:
"Do you want to be my boyfriend?"
Of course not."
"Well, FK you then. Die!
But besides sexual attraction, I am fascinated by him from purely a curiosity perpective. Looking at him is proof that Nature is capable of creating beautiful things it it wants to. It's like an art work created by Evolution. We are fascinated by people like him because it shows the pinnacle of genetic perfection of our species. But superb genes is not enough. His face and body also shows signs of a childhood free from infectionns, of superb health and sound development from an ealy age. I guess growing up playing soccer bare foot in Brazil and catching fish to eat with your bare hands(he is a fisher) and eating natural foods does mighty good for you:

Getting jumped by girls in Paris:

Breaking the scale of perfection:

This is so interesting but I think, as soon as you nominate a best-ever, someone will disagree. Yes, there are objective measurements. In addition to those facial ratios you mentioned there is also the Adonis Ratio of waist-to-shoulder. They surveyed a whole bunch of women of whom the vast majority said the most attractive male body shape had a waist-to-shoulder ratio of 1:1.68. That's the good ole' V shaped torso but not too pronounced, just "right".

I think we all do those instant measurements and triangulations when we assess guys in the street. And it's damn quick. I know within a second of seeing him whether a guy is worth my further attention. I'm sure it's not just a gay/bi thing. Straight guys check each other out too. It's probably an evolutionary impulse, looking for rivals that might prevent us spreading our seed.

Interesting that AI-generated images of "perfect" guys don't turn me on like real guys do. Perhaps we need some imperfections in the mix too, even if they are almost imperceptible.

I have known about Lachowski for several years. He is exceptionally good-looking. Beautiful. Brazil seems to produce amazingly good-looking people. There might be something in the genetic mix of Brazil that does that. I'm an even bigger fan of Francisco's compatriot Marlon Teixeira. He is so dark and earthy and, to my eyes at least, one of the most beautiful men I have ever seen.

My other nominee for a 9/10 is Hakan Serbes, a straight Turkish/German porn star active in the 1990s and early 2000s. There are a couple of threads about him on here.

Hakan had exceptional good looks and a rare combination of athletic sexuality and boyish sensuality. Beautiful face, gorgeous physique, perfect proportions. Michelangelo might have sculpted him.

I mean, wow, just wow....

 

[Rockford Tyson]

This is so interesting but I think, as soon as you nominate a best-ever, someone will disagree. Yes, there are objective measurements. In addition to those facial ratios you mentioned there is also the Adonis Ratio of waist-to-shoulder. They surveyed a whole bunch of women of whom the vast majority said the most attractive male body shape had a waist-to-shoulder ratio of 1:1.68. That's the good ole' V shaped torso but not too pronounced, just "right".

I think we all do those instant measurements and triangulations when we assess guys in the street. And it's damn quick. I know within a second of seeing him whether a guy is worth my further attention. I'm sure it's not just a gay/bi thing. Straight guys check each other out too. It's probably an evolutionary impulse, looking for rivals that might prevent us spreading our seed.

Interesting that AI-generated images of "perfect" guys don't turn me on like real guys do. Perhaps we need some imperfections in the mix too, even if they are almost imperceptible.

I have known about Lachowski for several years. He is exceptionally good-looking. Beautiful. Brazil seems to produce amazingly good-looking people. There might be something in the genetic mix of Brazil that does that. I'm an even bigger fan of Francisco's compatriot Marlon Teixeira. He is so dark and earthy and, to my eyes at least, one of the most beautiful men I have ever seen.

View attachment 131586561

View attachment 131586581

View attachment 131586591

My other nominee for a 9/10 is Hakan Serbes, a straight Turkish/German porn star active in the 1990s and early 2000s. There are a couple of threads about him on here.

Hakan had exceptional good looks and a rare combination of athletic sexuality and boyish sensuality. Beautiful face, gorgeous physique, perfect proportions. Michelangelo might have sculpted him.

View attachment 131587971

View attachment 131587991


View attachment 131588001

View attachment 131588121

View attachment 131588141

I mean, wow, just wow....

View attachment 131588371

Thanks. Yes, you are right. It is impossible to pick "one" guy that is most attractive ever because when you reach the top 0.001% or so, they are all SO attractive that it is mostly a matter of personal taste. Like, if you prefer green eyes or blue eyes, or more muscular/hairy type or more twinkish/waifish type.

The reason why I mentioned Chico Lachowski as being "most atractive is because *mathematically* his level of symmetry, proportion, balance and "golden mean" ratio between lower, middle and higher face and shape skull is exceptional even by the standards of 9/10s

When you reach the stratospheric top 0.001% in looks(genuine 9/10s), they are all so close to flawless that who is the "more" beautiful is just preference. But Chico from purely a mathematical perspective exceeds even those standards and is like a 9.5-9.9/10. He is not even one-in-a-million, but more like one-in-a-billion. Chico is close to six standard-deviations above the norm in beauty. He is top 0.0000001%

Also, the reason why I posted this is not just because of sexual attraction. Of course I am attracted to him. But I also posted this because of "scientific" interest. Because a person like that is like a work of art. But not a work of art created by men, but created by Nature. It's Nature, you know? I feel looking at Chico the way that I feel when I look at a beautiful animal in Nature, like a cheetah or a majestic Kodiak bear or something.

 

[Lian14]

Jon Erik Hexum
He died two decades before I was born, but I still think he was PERFECTION.

 

[Rockford Tyson]

Chico Lachowski is unfathomably beautiful. I seldom get to use the word "unfathomable", but there you have it. Bro looks A.I generated.

 

[Lian14]

I don't think he comes even close to Chico Lachowsky. Chico's face is way more harmonius, symmetrical and proportional. Also, I don't know how tall this guy is, but chico is almost 6'4. So, yeah, not even close.

I think you're getting quite irrational with Francisco Lachowski, but that's fine.
Bye

 

[qwe35gcdt]

I agree that there are certain standards of beauty and that a person will always make a quick and objective assessment of another person's appearance. By face, figure, clothes, neatness. But I personally cannot give an assessment in numbers. And I don’t understand by what criteria, other than facial proportions, you rate someone 4/10 and someone 9/10. What list?

Well, it is a mistake to think that some person will be beautiful to everyone. I think the subjective aspect is very strong.
Looking at Mr. Lakhovsky objectively, I can say that he looks good, it’s clear that he takes care of himself. But subjectively for me he is unattractive. I would pass by and not look at him if I met him on the street. Just like somebody will pass by me.

 

[Sasa323]

Speaking for myself, I have a new "Most Perfect Male Ever" every 2 days. I have a list with over 5K actors/singers/models/sportsmen, 4.9K of them vanish from my mind fast... Today I might be with you about this dude, he's close to perfection.... Can't disagree here. But tomorrow I'll move on to someone else and forget about this guy. He is special, but so are hundreeds of others...
Don't let other posters influence your opinions though. If you think he's the bestest male ever, I respect it. It's not hard to understand why you think so

 

[Thom Hewson]

This question sounds like an AI nightmare. Because as above within each type there are individual bests and mosts.

It seems like the guy who's most ..
is the one lucky enough to not be shorted in any one dept. Maybe that is why I can't quit my top daddy buddy, whose boyishly masculine looks make me swoon, whose hard muscled body I crave to hold, whose personality is kind and caring and sexual prowess is unparalleled, and whose thick virile cock takes my breath away. So thick I cannot get him into my throat. I melt at the thought of being bred my him. His seed heals me.

In a "perfect " world he would be vers by he's not, so I embrace my inner sub and let him have his way with me. And that's perfect enough.

 

[Rockford Tyson]

I think a lot of posters didn't understand what I meant here. I didn't state that Mr.Lachowski is the most attractve man ever. I asked if he is. That is why there is a question mark at the end of that sentence.

Obviously, there have been billions of men to walk the Earth, so picking just one that is the most beautiful is nigh-impossible.

My entire point is that beauty is not entirely subjective. It is subjective, yes, but not entirely. All attractive peoiple have in common cerain things, such as: facial symmetry, a well-developed jawline, a heart-shaped face that tapers down from top to bottom, a proportional distance between the chin and the nose, and from the nose to the forehead, high cheek bones, eyes with little or no visible upper lid, equilateral distance between the eyes, full lips, straight nose, etc.

Chico Lachovski is the person that has mathematically the most symmetrical, balanced and proportional face and features ever. This is why there are endless videos on YouTube about how he "broke the scale" of beauty, with the full explanation for it.

Now, you may not find him personally the most attractive or even attractive at all. For instance, many gay and bi guys go for ultra-masculijne looks in men, and even though Mr.Lachowki is manly-looking(he looks all man), he is not ultra-masculine in looks. He has that pretty boy(über-pretty) look, so if you're into "bears" or "daddies". I get it why you wouldn't personally find him attractive.

But in all the criteria that objectively makes a person attractive, you can make a case that he is the most attractive/beautiful man ever. On average, more people will find him more attractive than any other man.

 

[Mickey Finn]

I don't think you can say with any certainty that Lachowski is the most beautiful man ever. He just happens to have lived in the time of photography and a burgeoning fashion industry that have brought him to our attention.

Think of all the men who have ever lived. Nature is bound to have produced an equally "perfect" specimen, according to your rules of facial proportions, before. We'll just never know, because there was no way of recording that beauty.

Nor do I think you can assess overall attractiveness purely on the face alone. Surely the body must also be considered? In my earlier post I mentioned the Adonis Ratio of waist-to-shoulder width. Length of leg in relation to torso would also be a factor, and ratio of head-to-torso.

Finally, the way a guy inhabits his body. The way he moves. That is certainly a factor when checking out guys on the street. I've seen gorgeous-looking guys with great faces who stoop, shuffle or plod, which really detracts from their attractiveness. I've followed guys because I've enjoyed watching how they move - their gait, posture and rhythm. I think of this as a guy's "personal music", unique to him. Bringing it right back, to have any success at all, runway models like Lachowski must learn to move with a natural, masculine grace if they do not already possess that quality.

 

[Rockford Tyson]

"I don't think you can say with any certainty that Lachowski is the most beautiful man ever. He just happens to have lived in the time of photography and a burgeoning fashion industry that have brought him to our attention. "

This is why I didn't "state" that he's the most attractive man ever. I "asked" if he's the most attractive man ever. That is why I put a question mark at the end of that sentence. It seems like people have problems with reading comprehension nowadays, because this point that I already addressed keeps being brought up over and over again.

also, photography has been around for literally 200 years now, the film industry has been around for 120 years, and the modeling industry since the 1940's. Lots and lots and lots of attractive young men have been filmed and photographed, and Mr.Lachowski clears them all for mathematical measures of beauty

"Think of all the men who have ever lived. Nature is bound to have produced an equally "perfect" specimen, according to your rules of facial proportions, before. We'll just never know, because there was no way of recording that beauty."

Maybe. Sure. But we don;t know. Remember that even that are extremely genetically gifted might not develop properly due to malnutrition, or childhood infections.

To look this good, genes are not enough. A childhood rich in protein and nutrients is needed. Also, a childhood free of infections is also needed. For instance, a lot of men that have the genes for superb beauty never reach even close to their potential because they have allergies. When you have allergies, one of the effects is sinus clogging. If a little boy grows up breathing though the mouth, his facial boe structure won't develop properly. The tongue must be at the roof og the mouth to allow for perfect development. Moth breaths end up with long faces, thin mid faces and weak jaws due to poor development of the facial bones. Looking like Francisco is exceptionally rare. Superior genes and environmental influences must work perfectly together.

"Nor do I think you can assess overall attractiveness purely on the face alone. Surely the body must also be considered? In my earlier post I mentioned the Adonis Ratio of waist-to-shoulder width. Length of leg in relation to torso would also be a factor, and ratio of head-to-torso."

I also mentioned this. Mr.Lachowski is not only a stunning face. He is also 1.92 meter tall(6'3 1'2), has broad shoulders that tapper down to a small waist, and has a torso that is in perfect balance with the length of the legs. He's superb for skeletal structure as well.

"Finally, the way a guy inhabits his body. The way he moves. That is certainly a factor when checking out guys on the street."

He's a professional model. He has been trained to walk and move to flatter his body as much as possible. He also had perfect posture even before he was model. We know this because unlike 99.99% of all people he shows no signs of lorodosis.

"I've seen gorgeous-looking guys with great faces who stoop, shuffle or plod, which really detracts from their attractiveness. I've followed guys because I've enjoyed watching how they move - their gait, posture and rhythm. I think of this as a guy's "personal music", unique to him. Bringing it right back, to have any success at all, runway models like Lachowski must learn to move with a natural, masculine grace if they do not already possess that quality."

Ok, but I never claimed that Mr.Lachowski is the most attractive man ever to everyone. And I didn't even bring up that he would move in a way that pleases you or anyone else. My whole point was the symmetry, proportion and balance of his face and body and his height.

 

[Trybogus01]

Chico Lachowski has ethereal beauty but the only thing hindering me from putting him among the top of my list is his twinky physique..lol.

Apart from the face, a nice fit/hunky/sexy bod (but not to bulky/roided) doesn't only make you look hot but shows discipline and dedication and makes you stand out and physically attractive.

 

[Rockford Tyson]

Chico Lachowski has ethereal beauty but the only thing hindering me from putting him among the top of my list is his twinky physique..lol.

Apart from the face, a nice fit/hunky/sexy bod (but not to bulky/roided) doesn't only make you look hot but shows discipline and dedication and makes you stand out and physically attractive.

I don't have a problem with that. There is a certain degree of subjectivity to looks. My whole point was that looks are not entirely subjective like some people think. There are some objective facial and bone characteristics that all attractive people have in common, and Francisco Lachowski is the pinnacle of that.

However, it is imporant to point out that the "twinky" physique is the preffered look in men for both straight women and gay/bi men. Few people are attracted to burly, hairy, brutish-looking men.