Naughty Scotty Stripper from Swinging Richard’s

I really do not understand the misinformation here. There are nudes on his OF. You see that he is quite packing. The nudes aren't as explicit as other performers. There are no sex acts (cumshots, masturbation, etc.) but it is quite clear that he's got a Howitzer Cannon of a cock.
There are no nudes on his OF with the initial subscription. PPV potentially, but that is where people are calling him out. So please stop.
 
There are no nudes on his OF with the initial subscription. PPV potentially, but that is where people are calling him out. So please stop.
Regardless of whether or not the nudity is behind a paywall or not the nudity is still out there for the world to see (purchase). This is a good model who is getting lambasted for no reason. People can "call him out" for the paywall but not for falsifying his endowment. Just because his PPV content isn't shared in this forum, that does not mean he's lying.

Don't tell me to stop, even with a please, when I'm calling out misinformation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scottyrichardsatl
Regardless of whether or not the nudity is behind a paywall or not the nudity is still out there for the world to see (purchase). This is a good model who is getting lambasted for no reason. People can "call him out" for the paywall but not for falsifying his endowment. Just because his PPV content isn't shared in this forum, that does not mean he's lying.

Don't tell me to stop, even with a please, when I'm calling out misinformation.
But you're not calling out misinformation. You are putting on boots and a cape for no reason. If his OF was free and all the nudity was behind a paywall, no one can be mad. However, his OF content is similar to what we see on IG and Twitter, so we are paying for the opportunity to pay more to see something that people are rightfully skeptical of? Have a good day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarkLordOfLAX
This thread is rife with "fake" and "dildo in underwear" claims. You don't have to read that far back to see this multiple times over. That is misinformation. He's a performer and performers are in it to make money. Don't talk about my hero's uniform and then pretend to call the play with a whistle and a zebra striped shirt. The booth review will rule otherwise.
 
Okay for shits and giggles let’s just say he’s super hung and indeed does show his dick behind a paywall…

That doesn’t make those example photos posted a few pages back any less staged. Anyone with a brain can tell that he has a dildo in his undies for those photos. Real penises do not look like that. He may very well be hung, but that’s not his dick in the underwear photos.
 
This thread is rife with "fake" and "dildo in underwear" claims. You don't have to read that far back to see this multiple times over. That is misinformation. He's a performer and performers are in it to make money. Don't talk about my hero's uniform and then pretend to call the play with a whistle and a zebra striped shirt. The booth review will rule otherwise.
Girl what are you talking about…