Nick skoufatos

It’s always a bit disingenuous to me when someone makes an outlandishly reductive statement about an entire group of people, gets taken to task for it and then wants to feign ignorance. But I’m bored so I’ll play a little.

You say your original statement lacked context so let’s add some.

You wrote that a man under a certain height cannot be a perfect 10. Here’s what I and I believe most other posters read:

‘More than half the men on this planet could never be perfect in my eyes because of a random physical trait. And it is that one physical trait that would supersede all other desirable qualities this person may possess and therefore they will always have a (slight) physical flaw. I could come across a man who has every conceivable attractive quality that I seek in a mate, but If he doesn’t posses this ONE trait, he absolutely cannot be prefect…’


I’m sorry but that is an incredibly shallow and some might say prejudicial way of thinking.

No one condemns you for having a preference, we all do.

I happen to prefer older, beefier, hairy men myself. But that doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate the beauty/sexiness/appeal of young, toned, hairless men, either.

I also don’t go around posting things like:

So-and-so is absolutely perfect in every way, but he’s a smooth twunk and and a hairless guy could never be perfect for me. I repeat for ME .”

You’re entitled to your preference. But when you begin using that preference as a means of contending that others are less than - it seems arbitrary and wrong.

Least to me it does.
shallow is the most perfect word to describe the person that said that and even most gays in general. SHALLOW
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brian74
Do you cum harder if a guy is 6'2"? How can you notice 2 inches of difference on-screen? Is it something you have to be aware of or do you just cum really hard over a video and say "damn, that guy must be 6'2"
I could always tell Nick isn’t super tall, and the added context of knowing a guy is 6’2 or taller definitely makes me cum harder.

it’s like some people cum harder knowing a guy used to be a police officer or like won a pretty feet contest or something. This is just my niche and kink lol
 
Dude
It’s always a bit disingenuous to me when someone makes an outlandishly reductive statement about an entire group of people, gets taken to task for it and then wants to feign ignorance. But I’m bored so I’ll play a little.

You say your original statement lacked context so let’s add some.

You wrote that a man under a certain height cannot be a perfect 10. Here’s what I and I believe most other posters read:

‘More than half the men on this planet could never be perfect in my eyes because of a random physical trait. And it is that one physical trait that would supersede all other desirable qualities this person may possess and therefore they will always have a (slight) physical flaw. I could come across a man who has every conceivable attractive quality that I seek in a mate, but If he doesn’t posses this ONE trait, he absolutely cannot be prefect…’


I’m sorry but that is an incredibly shallow and some might say prejudicial way of thinking.

No one condemns you for having a preference, we all do.

I happen to prefer older, beefier, hairy men myself. But that doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate the beauty/sexiness/appeal of young, toned, hairless men, either.

I also don’t go around posting things like:

So-and-so is absolutely perfect in every way, but he’s a smooth twunk and and a hairless guy could never be perfect for me. I repeat for ME .”

You’re entitled to your preference. But when you begin using that preference as a means of contending that others are less than - it seems arbitrary and wrong.

Least to me it does.

This whole thing is so funny to me cuz y’all want him to be a 10 so bad but he just isn’t to me lol

I love how yall judge me for caring about the 2 inches of height but y’all can’t even get over my 1 point short of rating him a 10
 
It’s always a bit disingenuous to me when someone makes an outlandishly reductive statement about an entire group of people, gets taken to task for it and then wants to feign ignorance. But I’m bored so I’ll play a little.

You say your original statement lacked context so let’s add some.

You wrote that a man under a certain height cannot be a perfect 10. Here’s what I and I believe most other posters read:

‘More than half the men on this planet could never be perfect in my eyes because of a random physical trait. And it is that one physical trait that would supersede all other desirable qualities this person may possess and therefore they will always have a (slight) physical flaw. I could come across a man who has every conceivable attractive quality that I seek in a mate, but If he doesn’t posses this ONE trait, he absolutely cannot be prefect…’


I’m sorry but that is an incredibly shallow and some might say prejudicial way of thinking.

No one condemns you for having a preference, we all do.

I happen to prefer older, beefier, hairy men myself. But that doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate the beauty/sexiness/appeal of young, toned, hairless men, either.

I also don’t go around posting things like:

So-and-so is absolutely perfect in every way, but he’s a smooth twunk and and a hairless guy could never be perfect for me. I repeat for ME .”

You’re entitled to your preference. But when you begin using that preference as a means of contending that others are less than - it seems arbitrary and wrong.

Least to me it does.

But I do apologize for giving Nick only a 9, this is why society is crumbling, a very conventionally attractive man can’t be a 10.

I meannnn come ON.

I just wanna say this again cuz it’s so incredibly funny how serious you’re twisting this into: he’s ONLY a 9.
 
shallow is the most perfect word to describe the person that said that and even most gays in general. SHALLOW
Welcome to the world of porn: judging someone’s hotness based on physical appearance according to personal preference and fetish
 
Ugh news flash, you still mentioned rating people as a 10, which is delusional because perfection doesn't exist. No need to add that part if you realize it's a fetish love.
I did not “add that part”, I was chiming in with my opinions after seeing other people calling him a 10.

Say all this to the people replying to my comment cuz they have problem with me not giving Nick a 10.

but you just wanted to pile on, doesn’t actually have the balls to go against the majority of the commenters here
 
I did not “add that part”, I was chiming in with my opinions after seeing other people calling him a 10.

Say all this to the people replying to my comment cuz they have problem with me not giving Nick a 10.

but you just wanted to pile on, doesn’t actually have the balls to go against the majority of the commenters here
Darling everyone is free to speak their mind. I was speaking mine. I didn't tag you because I was adding my comment in general. I'm only responding to you now because you tagged me. If anyone who thinks perfection is a real thing wants to reply to my comment they are more than welcomed to do so. You are free to imagine any information about me you want, that's none of my business.