Photos & Videos NYC Judge CtrlZalt's OnlyFans

Ummmm...is this a joke? I'm very sexy-positive and very kinky, and I actually like this guy's videos a lot, but there's an obvious limit and he blew soooooo far past it. "A little more lax in your sexual life"?! Dude sucks dick and gets fucked on public streets in NYC. Would you want the judge in your case to be running out during recess to slurp piss in the bathroom? Or come back to the courtroom with cum all over his face?

People lose years of their lives dealing with the law and attorneys put hundreds if not thousands of hours of work into cases, and you think it's A-OK—actually you think it's commendable—for this dude to be tweeting about how many anon loads he took last night while sitting on the bench holding people's lives and livelihoods in his hands?

Fact is, dude was playing with fire and he got burned. The legal profession is probably the most conservative and insular there is—you're required to report fucking parking tickets on some bar applications—and he's been getting fucked and fisted and gang banged on camera as an attorney for years. For him to then tell a NYC councilwoman to "choke on a dick" on Twitter, knowing full well that his face is out there getting pissed and cum on, is so risky and arrogant I can barely believe he actually did it. And you think he should be nominated as a federal judge?! Give me a fucking break.
I think in a better society it should be totally fine if a persona has an active sex life. what you should be judged in your work place is your work and nothing else.

These public face is so victorian 18th century Britain, not 2023
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrewharvey583
I think in a better society it should be totally fine if a persona has an active sex life. what you should be judged in your work place is your work and nothing else.

These public face is so victorian 18th century Britain, not 2023

Absolutely unhinged. It has nothing to do with having an "active sex life." He can do whatever the hell he pleases on his own time, but that changes when he posts videos of himself getting fisted and drinking piss to social media with his face in it, then accepts a public job that requires him to have the trust and respect of the general public. To reiterate, he has voluntarily posted videos of him having sex in public—a literal crime that could land him on a sex offender registry for life—and apparently thought he could remain in his position as a judge.

There are many cases where reactions like yours are correct, e.g. teachers who get fired after their private OFs are revealed by shitty kids or vindictive parents. This is not one of them. He thumbed his nose at the rules because he thought he was untouchable (and almost certainly got off on it) and he got screwed. That's all.
 
Absolutely unhinged. It has nothing to do with having an "active sex life." He can do whatever the hell he pleases on his own time, but that changes when he posts videos of himself getting fisted and drinking piss to social media with his face in it, then accepts a public job that requires him to have the trust and respect of the general public. To reiterate, he has voluntarily posted videos of him having sex in public—a literal crime that could land him on a sex offender registry for life—and apparently thought he could remain in his position as a judge.

There are many cases where reactions like yours are correct, e.g. teachers who get fired after their private OFs are revealed by shitty kids or vindictive parents. This is not one of them. He thumbed his nose at the rules because he thought he was untouchable (and almost certainly got off on it) and he got screwed. That's all.
I don't understand. it is ok to do it in private but it is bad if it is common knowledge? if his dereliction of public duties didn't hinder when he was doing it in private why should they if it is a public knowledge? Judges are "allowed" to get fisted or drink piss in private, its their sex life. If that doesn't hinder them from doing their job, how dies it matter if his photos/pics are in public?

I don't understand how do you draw this connection that having these pics in the public domain somehow makes this person less trustworthy.


Not too long ago people had to live a gay life in private as it was less respectable to do so. But we have now realized being gay doesn't have anything to do with doing a job properly (or not) or being a respectable human being. If there is no causation between having these pics in the public domain and him performing his duties then they wouldn't matter. I would say a better society would be where people know that we all are human beings and sexual beings and someone's sex life, public or private, is independent of how you treat them or of their work. I will be totally fine knowing that a future president already has their nudes floating around on the internet rn and it is not a big deal
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanewayne07
I don't understand. it is ok to do it in private but it is bad if it is common knowledge? if his dereliction of public duties didn't hinder when he was doing it in private why should they if it is a public knowledge? Judges are "allowed" to get fisted or drink piss in private, its their sex life. If that doesn't hinder them from doing their job, how dies it matter if his photos/pics are in public?

I don't understand how do you draw this connection that having these pics in the public domain somehow makes this person less trustworthy.


Not too long ago people had to live a gay life in private as it was less respectable to do so. But we have now realized being gay doesn't have anything to do with doing a job properly (or not) or being a respectable human being. If there is no causation between having these pics in the public domain and him performing his duties then they wouldn't matter. I would say a better society would be where people know that we all are human beings and sexual beings and someone's sex life, public or private, is independent of how you treat them or of their work. I will be totally fine knowing that a future president already has their nudes floating around on the internet rn and it is not a big deal

If you don't understand how having public pics/videos of you getting a dozen loads blown on your face, drinking piss, and taking fists up your ass (not to mention the crimes) makes it impossible to do a job that requires public trust and respect in your judgement, then I can't help you. We all know intellectually that people have sex and have kinks and do weird shit. But that's very different than seeing it confirmed firsthand.

You legitimately can't grasp how, for example, someone looking for an attorney to keep them out of prison would look askance at a guy they've seen completely naked, sitting on a dude's arm with a cage on his cock? Or how someone looking for an accountant to handle their life savings would be put off by a guy who drinks piss in public bathrooms? Or how someone looking for a therapist would find it impossible to take advice from the dude who's asshole he's seen inside of? Really? You're either being deliberately obtuse or you're living in lala land.

And you're 100% wrong about that last bit. Nobody with public nudes will ever—EVER—be elected president.
 
If you don't understand how having public pics/videos of you getting a dozen loads blown on your face, drinking piss, and taking fists up your ass (not to mention the crimes) makes it impossible to do a job that requires public trust and respect in your judgement, then I can't help you. We all know intellectually that people have sex and have kinks and do weird shit. But that's very different than seeing it confirmed firsthand.

You legitimately can't grasp how, for example, someone looking for an attorney to keep them out of prison would look askance at a guy they've seen completely naked, sitting on a dude's arm with a cage on his cock? Or how someone looking for an accountant to handle their life savings would be put off by a guy who drinks piss in public bathrooms? Or how someone looking for a therapist would find it impossible to take advice from the dude who's asshole he's seen inside of? Really? You're either being deliberately obtuse or you're living in lala land.

And you're 100% wrong about that last bit. Nobody with public nudes will ever—EVER—be elected president.
but are you agreeing that there is no causation link between being kinky/having nudes in public, and doing your job properly, just that it is not seen in a good light in our society?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanewayne07
but are you agreeing that there is no causation link between being kinky/having nudes in public, and doing your job properly, just that it is not seen in a good light in our society?
idk maybe I have seen so much of that stuff that for me personally it is such a no-big deal. As long as this person knows the law and can do his job properly I don't really care about these things, and in my mind, he is not any lesser of a person. And probably part of it comes from the fact that I myself or my friends have engaged in similar things and I don't think of myself or them as any of lesser people because of such things. I don't think engaging in an orgy or piss play or whatever he was doing per se makes a person lesser.

What does bother me more is if a president or someone running for president is being an a-hole/racist, or is mentally incapable of doing his job.
 
im not surprised he was fired.

some of you dont quite understand how the world works.

even if you have a regular job you can get fired for having an onlyfans and showing your face.

you, always, represent the company you work for. in his case, it was the state new york haha.

this has absolutely nothing to do with "right to be a sex worker" or watever woke stuff y'all come up with.

i personally dont want my lawyer or judge to have an onlyfans where he or her face is shown, and know about it haha.

not only that, he was also in a porn studio production haha
 
Last edited:
but are you agreeing that there is no causation link between being kinky/having nudes in public, and doing your job properly, just that it is not seen in a good light in our society?

No, I’m not agreeing. For a non-public-facing job, I think having public nudes is fine. But it’s impossible to do the job of a judge—or therapist or wealth manager or attorney or lawmaker—when the people who your opinions affect have seen you bent over with someone’s hand in your asshole.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 3vil3y3
No, I’m not agreeing. For a non-public-facing job, I think having public nudes is fine. But it’s impossible to do the job of a judge—or therapist or wealth manager or attorney or lawmaker—when the people who your opinions affect have seen you bent over with someone’s hand in your asshole.
I am not asking if people think it is ok or not.

I am asking is is there any real "causation link between being kinky/having nudes in public and doing your job properly". ie is it true that irrespective of people's opinion, a person who has nudes in public can/can not do their job properly? does it have any bearing in reality that the nudes inherently abstain a person from doing their job?

If it doesn't, then people's opinion is based on unfounded reasons, kind of like how people killed left-handed people for being left-handed or killed women for being witches or killed/kill gays for being gay.
 
Shit, I would love to meet him for a parTy of our own and feel his ass slide down my bare dick. I want to stroke stroke and suck him and make his dick point up like in his pic.
Get the fuck out of here with this meth shit.