I like deodorant. One of my biggest fears of the Zombie Apocalypse is no deodorant and everyone stinks."good old days" before deodorant, obesity, many labels, and guys entire ego tied to the size of his dick
I like deodorant. One of my biggest fears of the Zombie Apocalypse is no deodorant and everyone stinks."good old days" before deodorant, obesity, many labels, and guys entire ego tied to the size of his dick
Yes, I can understand why this might be your primary fear. Better stock up by visiting your local drugstore...I like deodorant. One of my biggest fears of the Zombie Apocalypse is no deodorant and everyone stinks.
sorry if this sounded weird at all.I wish I was born in these days. My grandfather (step grandfather) has pics like these from his days.
Always gets me hard
I agree with you.In my opinion, a good but barely recognized example of how male bonding has changed over the years is the inclusion of privacy barriers between urinals. At one time, men were unafraid to expose their dicks to other men in the simple view that having dicks added to their commonality with other men. But now many men are afraid to let other men see their dicks out of fear that other men might be lusting after their dicks.
And yet.... I found myself thinking of places like the opera or symphony or theatre, where people are often dressed up a I bit (tho' not so formal as it used to be) and then they go take a pis and are about 4 inches from the next guy... in his nice suit and pissing away... somehow, I find that a kind of slap in the face given the high-brow culture of the situation, so in that case I prefer the dividers. Is that weird?I know that in NFL locker rooms, dudes talk about their dicks and having a big dick a lot. But, average men don't have access to that world.
Some of the well-hung dudes talk very casually and open about their penises: "I'm going to put my big dick here and take a piss." Some of them talk like that. I know this from interviews with football podcast from former players. I heard this a few times.
We don't need urinal dividers.
In everyday life, we men act like Puritans with our dicks, and then come home and pull it out in front of a computer.
This might be a special case.And yet.... I found myself thinking of places like the opera or symphony or theatre, where people are often dressed up a I bit (tho' not so formal as it used to be) and then they go take a pis and are about 4 inches from the next guy... in his nice suit and pissing away... somehow, I find that a kind of slap in the face given the high-brow culture of the situation, so in that case I prefer the dividers. Is that weird?
Yeah, it's a rarefied atmosphere at that kind of concert/performance.This might be a special case.
But we need to teach our boys to have no shame in having a penis. Dividers promote insecurity.
The vast majority of men are very average in size. They are not porn-star hung like the men on LPSG.
Yes, because of porn and the internet, we start to think every dude has a fat dick like me (sorry for the bragging, but it's LPSG). There's nothing impressive about the vast majority of men's dicks. I've seen thousands over the years. Very well-hung men are not at all common. Big length is more common than big girth -- I found that out over the years.Yeah, it's a rarefied atmosphere at that kind of concert/performance.
I was just writing my buddy who sends me incredibly hot men whose photos he finds on Twitter. (Well, he doesn't exactly send me the MEN; I mean he send me the pics!!
I said to him that I know perfectly well that the superstar models are rare, but when you're confronted with about 20 in a row in an email, it's hard not to believe that 98% of guys are hung like that!
I am convinced that the general change in attitude among men about being nude in the presence of one another is a manifestation of deeply rooted homophobia. At one time in our soceity, people did't think much about the existance of hmosexuality and its variations. But this has changed with the passage of time, being replaced--if not in all situations--at least in those involving any sort of nudity with fear of what the other person's interest in them might actually be; or, even more interestingly, the concern might be why would men who have no desire to have sex with each other be exposing their private parts to each other? That is supposed to be something that they do only with their {female} sexual partners.Great thread! And it reminds us of what it USED to mean to be a man---confident and assured with his peers, no matter what sort of body he had, or how big his dick.
I think we've backed ourselves into a corner, really. In an effort to move away from "toxic masculinity" (which we did need to do), we seem to have gone too far in the opposite direction, and affected our own psyches. I'm not sure when it started to become apparent that men "needed" privacy...and became ashamed of their own bodies. Maybe it was gay porn leaning into the heavily-muscled, big-dicked males...or maybe the women seeming to outwardly prefer those types of men. But, we lost something somewhere along the way.
What's worse, I find it socially strange that women are allowed and encouraged to have BFFs, whom they interact with much of their day. Yet if a man has a bud that he likes to be in contact with frequently, it's immediately assumed that he's gay or bi. I hardly think that most of the guys in the above pics are gay...or even bi. It just wasn't looked at that way not too long ago. As the OP mentioned, men had many different opportunities to bond in the past---naked or otherwise. Now, we're all at home in silos.
Men are different when they are naked with each other---their masks and pretenses are down. They can't hide anything...and their honesty comes out. It's more relaxed...less competitive. The locker room used to be one of the few places left where guys could interact in this way. Now, it's all the "towel dance"...
Not good...not good...
I think that you've pretty much hit the nail on the head. My dad was a part of the Greatest Generation, and active in WWII. From what I saw of him and his peers, they were all very comfortable both with male nudity as a result of being in the service, and also very comfortable with whatever homosexuality was there amongst them. The old saying of just wanting to be able to "trust the guy in the foxhole next to you" must have pretty much negated almost any sort of hatred of anyone's sexual leanings. Additionally, he was also a first-generation-American child of immigrants, who probably brought over a lot of the more laissez-faire European attitudes toward sex (of any sort). As a result, he was comfortable with homosexuality...as were most of his peers. I often hung around them as they got together to work on their cars or their home projects...and the talk often got very raunchy, as it usually does with men and cars and beer. But, I NEVER heard any negative slams towards homosexuals. My family had friends who were both gay and lesbian...and this was all during the McCarthy witch hunts where gay men were a particular target. I never even heard the word "gay" until I got older.I am convinced that the general change in attitude among men about being nude in the presence of one another is a manifestation of deeply rooted homophobia. At one time in our soceity, people did't think much about the existance of hmosexuality and its variations. But this has changed with the passage of time, being replaced--if not in all situations--at least in those involving any sort of nudity with fear of what the other person's interest in them might actually be; or, even more interestingly, the concern might be why would men who have no desire to have sex with each other be exposing their private parts to each other? That is supposed to be something that they do only with their {female} sexual partners.
Very well stated.I think that you've pretty much hit the nail on the head. My dad was a part of the Greatest Generation, and active in WWII. From what I saw of him and his peers, they were all very comfortable both with male nudity as a result of being in the service, and also very comfortable with whatever homosexuality was there amongst them. The old saying of just wanting to be able to "trust the guy in the foxhole next to you" must have pretty much negated almost any sort of hatred of anyone's sexual leanings. Additionally, he was also a first-generation-American child of immigrants, who probably brought over a lot of the more laissez-faire European attitudes toward sex (of any sort). As a result, he was comfortable with homosexuality...as were most of his peers. I often hung around them as they got together to work on their cars or their home projects...and the talk often got very raunchy, as it usually does with men and cars and beer. But, I NEVER heard any negative slams towards homosexuals. My family had friends who were both gay and lesbian...and this was all during the McCarthy witch hunts where gay men were a particular target. I never even heard the word "gay" or "faggot" until I got into junior high school with my own peers.
Since then, though, it seems that Evangelical Religion has taken this country by storm. And with it, a complete fear of both the naked body (particularly the male body)...and of homosexuality. Growing up, religion was never a big deal in my environment, outside of Sunday (or Friday) services. Religion wasn't talked about in social groups outside of church, and it wasn't talked about in school (I had friends of so many different religions you couldn't count them). Instead, it was a very private matter for yourself, and your family. Now, of course, it's all shouted from the rooftops...and people seem to be browbeaten into behaving certain ways. I really do have to laugh at how men at the gym do the "towel dance" (it takes so much effort)...or will go into the showers or sauna in their underwear so no one ever sees their genitals.
That is very different from when I grew up. And, I don't find it an "improvement" or a "moral compass" at all. It is merely stupid and hateful...and I think that it has a LOT to do with the growing issues of males losing their way in today's society. It is not all about women "taking their place", or becoming more aggressive themselves. Instead, men cannot bond with each other anymore...and end up feeling isolated and unsure of just who they are. And then, they end up on sites like this to try and figure it out.
I am convinced that the general change in attitude among men about being nude in the presence of one another is a manifestation of deeply rooted homophobia. At one time in our soceity, people did't think much about the existance of hmosexuality and its variations. But this has changed with the passage of time, being replaced--if not in all situations--at least in those involving any sort of nudity with fear of what the other person's interest in them might actually be; or, even more interestingly, the concern might be why would men who have no desire to have sex with each other be exposing their private parts to each other? That is supposed to be something that they do only with their {female} sexual partners.
I disagree with this take. The U.S. actually used to be much more religious than it is now, and church attendance was much higher in the days when swimming at the YMCA was all-nude. And while it's clear that most Evangelicals, devout Catholics, etc. frown upon public nudity, I've never seen evidence that those attitudes transfer to a men's locker room. In fact, in my experience religious men are more comfortable being naked in a locker room situation, and not for some perverted reason, but probably because they know who they are. (In fact, several years ago I dealt work-wise with visiting sports teams from a few Evangelical Christian colleges and I don't remember anyone towel-dancing or being afraid to get naked and shower after a game.) I know there are a small number of Muslims who believe that one should not "see or be seen" and avoid locker room nudity but I'm not familiar with any Christian leader who has said that it's wrong for a man to be naked in a men's locker room.Since then, though, it seems that Evangelical Religion has taken this country by storm. And with it, a complete fear of both the naked body (particularly the male body).
I see your point(s)---and they are valid. But, they actually just sort of substantiate mine...I disagree. I think there are several factors that have influenced people's attitudes.
1.) In the past most men couldn't avoid situations where they had to be undressed in front of other men so they got used to it. When the draft existed there were more men who had to deal with barracks, open showers, and the overall lack of privacy that exists in the military. Many schools required swimming (sometimes nude swimming) and showers after gym class. There were larger families and fewer bathrooms in homes, so kids got used to sharing a bedroom or even being in the bathroom when a brother, father, uncle, male cousin, etc. was showering.
2.) As mentioned by others, there is the ubiquity of cameras these days, and while it's not common for people to use them in a changing room, it does happen.
3.) One thing that is overlooked is also the growing absence of fathers or father figures. I am NOT attacking single mothers, they have a very difficult job. But I think many of them don't understand that it's normal (or at least used to be) for guys to just get naked in front of each other in locker rooms, and if they do understand they can't lead by example. I've heard stories about kids complaining about having to change in a locker room for whatever reason and the mothers think the boys' fears are justified. (I remember reading a specific story where two boys were at a YMCA or similar facility and had to use the restroom, which was located in the locker room area. Afterwards they complained to their mother that they had seen a naked man (but did not claim that he interacted with them in any way). The mother freaked out and complained to the staff, even asking if it was illegal for someone to walk from a locker to the shower without covering up!) As a result, some adult men feel the need to cover up to avoid being accused of perversion. I do occasionally see a father at the gym who will bring his sons with him to the locker room and they see that he's not afraid to be naked in that situation, but I think it's something that used to be more common.
FYI, here's an interesting comment that I found on reddit.
View attachment 150229031
Well, I'm 72...and the US was never as OVERTLY religious in my lifetime as it is now. It wasn't proselytized the way it is today. Yes, in the 1950s we all went to church or temple every Sunday (or Friday night), much more than today...but that was the end of it. We didn't talk religion after church, nor in social settings, nor in school, nor in our doctor's offices. Nor did it effect our outlook on anything other than "do unto others"...which was the common denominator in all of the various religions that I was exposed to. Perhaps I lived in a more diverse city than you...but religion in those days was extremely personal---not a "group effort". Seriously, there were just too many different denominations (and not all "Christian"at that) for any one to claim any high ground. And, yes...Billy Graham and Kathryn Kuhlman had TV shows that were well-watched...but it wasn't a topic of continued discussion that way those sorts of things are today.I disagree with this take. The U.S. actually used to be much more religious than it is now, and church attendance was much higher in the days when swimming at the YMCA was all-nude. And while it's clear that most Evangelicals, devout Catholics, etc. frown upon public nudity, I've never seen evidence that those attitudes transfer to a men's locker room. In fact, in my experience religious men are more comfortable being naked in a locker room situation, and not for some perverted reason, but probably because they know who they are. (In fact, several years ago I dealt work-wise with visiting sports teams from a few Evangelical Christian colleges and I don't remember anyone towel-dancing or being afraid to get naked and shower after a game.) I know there are a small number of Muslims who believe that one should not "see or be seen" and avoid locker room nudity but I'm not familiar with any Christian leader who has said that it's wrong for a man to be naked in a men's locker room.